-
Agree with the landlord, Grant is a well-known iron king, in the Thunder is to brush personal data and have no contribution to the team, and the Pacers played well under the leadership of Granger, originally the Pacers sent away O'Neal Jr. I think it is the most uninteresting team in the league, and there is not even a famous player in the team, now it seems that Granger has highlighted the temperament of a leader, and has staged a good show of lore many times, so Granger wins.
-
The landlord is wrong, Durant is much taller than Granger, if you go head-to-head, Durant will definitely win, last season it was only the coach who put Durant at the point guard that caused him to become the king of iron, this season changed to his familiar small forward position for two points, and the three-point shooting percentage can be ranked in the forefront of the swing guard!
-
In a few years, Adu has strength, great potential, and will surpass Granger in the future, and now I think Granger is stronger.
-
Durant strikes iron all day... Granger is better than him, and if Granger had been on the Thunder's bad team with unlimited shots, he would definitely be able to compete for the scoring title now.
-
Durant, Durant is tall and has long arms, and Durant has a high shooting percentage.
Granger: Durant:
-
Definitely Durant, whether it is talent, technology, flexibility, speed, Durant is slightly better
-
It's hard to say right now.
However, in a few years, it should be Durant, and Durant has more potential than Granger.
-
Actually, I really think they are very similar, their playing style, and their temperament are all very similar. However, we think Granger is more fierce, after all, he has beaten a few teams this season, which is quite exciting.
-
You're talking about heads-up, right, not for the respective teams.
I'm afraid you're going to disappoint you, landlord.
It's definitely Durant who wins.
Because Durant is taller than Granger, and his flexibility is not inferior to him. Offensive talent is stronger.
-
Granger is doing great at defending and shooting! Honors only 2008-2009 Most Improved Player and All-Star! Peak Granger is also a defensive gate, three points are very good, and it can be said that he is the third small forward in the East after James and Pierce!
I believe that Granger can be selected as an All-Star now, playing the No. 3 and No. 4 positions!
Granger 2008-2009 Season Scoring Points, Shooting Percentage, Three-Point Rebounds and Assists! The team is 36-46 and misses the playoffs! He led the team to a 27-30 record and a 9-16 record when he was not on the team. The team's results have improved significantly.
-
Gerald Wallace has a better defense, Granger has a better offense, but if you have to pick one, it's Granger
-
Wallace defends well, Granger plays well both offensively and defensively
-
I choose Durant, a four-time scoring champion, and there are many ways to score.
To be honest, it is difficult to defend an opponent at this level in the NBA, so the probability of winning the key is high, and there is no one who fights who absolutely wins.
-
Wu You will definitely not win against Durant alone.
Durant is now the top small forward, second only to LeBron James, the second small forward in the active service, has won many scoring titles, MVP, and is less than his opponent in the NBA, not to mention Wu You.
-
Durant wouldn't take him seriously at all, and he didn't bother to defend him when he fought him, just symbolically stretched out his hand, but in the end Durant still won. Rose also played casually when he fought with him, and finally said that he was very competitive, which meant that Rose felt that this was just casual play, and he played very hard, so it made Rose feel that he was competing rather than the entertainment of friendship, even if Rose played very loosely, he still beat him with his worst long-range shot. To be honest, the gap is really too big to compare.
-
Are you kidding? Wu You is half as powerful as Durant, and he has long been the core of the national team.
-
Durant is stronger, has better physical fitness than Curry, and is much better than Curry defensively, and his scoring ability is no worse than Curry.
The difference is that one is 480 and the other is 680
Frank Lampard. England fans have always expressed their displeasure with Frank Lampard's performances at two World Cups, failing to score despite his efforts. >>>More
The multifaceted nature of Zhu Xun and Nigmaiti"Identity"They are: >>>More