Which lens is good for the Canon 550D kit? 55 or 135? What are the characteristics of each? Which wi

This refers to the 18-55mm pullover and the 18-135mm pullover.

The wide-angle end is 18mm, and the effect should be the same, of course, the distortion of the 18-55 lens will be due to the 18-135, but it is not obvious to the naked eye.

The 135mm zoom factor is a bit larger than the 55mm, allowing you to shoot things farther.

A long focal length can also make the background blur more pronounced and the subject more prominent.

The lens of 18-135 can basically achieve one shot to go all over the world, eliminating the trouble of changing lenses.

Of course, 18-135** is also much higher than 18-55, and 18-55 is enough for beginners It is a good choice for practice.

It works well as well.

If you're a beginner. It doesn't matter what head it is.

The information you give is also not clear.

Canton Friends is not suitable for portrait shooting.

55 of the good points of the Cantonese Friendship.

You have to read more, and only if you are strong enough can you trust others and trust others.

In terms of image quality and ease of use, the Canon 550D with 18-55mm IS and 55-250mm is more suitable.

In terms of image quality, the larger the zoom range, the worse the image quality.

The 18-135mm zoom range is in multiples. The 18-55 zoom factor is 3x, and the 55-250 zoom factor is a multiple.

Therefore, with 18-55mm IS and 55-250mm lenses, the image quality is better.

From the perspective of use, the telephoto 250 is much stronger than the 135.

Objects that are farther away can be brought closer.

So it is more appropriate to use 18-55mm IS and 55-250mm lenses.

It is recommended to buy 18-135, and it is a waste to shoot portraits and landscapes with a wide enough focal length of 18-135 to 200, and the focal length effect of the 250 lens after 100 is getting worse and worse, and the focal length that can be used is similar to that of the 18-135 lens. Moreover, the 250 dual lens is higher than the 18-135mm lens**; If you're outdoors, it's inconvenient to change the lens (I feel this very much, hehe); The bokeh effect of the large aperture is not obvious, there is no ultrasound development, the autofocus is relatively slow, and it is a special lens of ASP-C size, which can shoot landscapes, and it is useless to change to a full-frame camera after shooting portraits much worse than the fixed focus. The key is that the 18-135 lens is in line with the cost performance ratio of novices.

All three of these heads are very average heads, so there's no big concern.

Although 18-55 55-250 is a bit larger from the data, it is extremely inconvenient to use, and it is very annoying to run around with two heads.

18-135 is quite suitable for beginners. It is recommended to buy this head first to learn the best. And then with a 50mm photo of the person, it's actually completely sufficient.

I can tell you that these three lenses are actually meaningless, they are all non-professional heads, and they are not good heads.

It is recommended that you go directly to the 18-200 The problem of these three heads has been solved, if you are on it, find the red circle head Wide angle 17-40 24-70 24-105 70-200 on some of this.

If you only dwell on the above three recommendations, 18-200 lz is not necessary.

Personally, I recommend 18-135, after practicing and getting familiar with the camera, you can try to buy some good fixed focus heads, 50 and other mid-priced fixed focus heads, as well as 200L 400L and other ** telephoto heads

The former can take a long shot, the latter can't. In fact, it doesn't matter which one is better, because the former you have to change the lens often, and the latter can have a softer image quality than the former. Again, it should be emphasized that equipment is not more important than the head in the back.

It's not good, which one is better to buy cheaply.

Novices use 18-55 bars, all average, to be technical, shoot more hands.