Which set of configurations is more reasonable, I don t know which set of two configurations to choo

The above three configurations can be used, in fact, the main decision depends on what you play...Ashkenazi Donic Black Power compared to STIGA-OC....In fact, to say that the elastic OC is not bad, the strength of the big force is even better than the black force The softness of the OC is mainly experienced in the borrowing force, near the small ball, pushing and blocking shocks, etc. (you need to take the initiative to attack, and it is very passive to play defense with OC)....Relatively speaking, the performance of black power in all aspects is relatively comprehensive (Limba surface material + ayous force material + ayous core material 5 wood, from the structural point of view, it does not belong to the big hard), but due to the use of transverse force material relationship, the feel is more solid....But the performance of the arc ring cannot be compared with the OC (the black force is 5 wood arc fast, and the OC is a classic 5 wood arc circle professional board)....If you choose OC with the arc circle as the main scoring method, you can consider adding CR. If you want to make it easy to get started, the comprehensive style of play is black power...Forehand madness 3 is enough without glue 39 degrees. Now the factory is more solid.

The backhand Dornick F1 is a very squeamish coat. Pay attention to maintenance (I feel that Sriver is also more durable than it)....

The black power is much thicker than the OC, not as shocking as the OC. The elasticity of the two is about the same, and the black is slightly better. The possession arc OC should be two notches better. There is also black in ** and appearance has advantages, amateur players do not pursue performance can choose black power.

The backhand Zini is much better than F1, F1 is more difficult to control, especially the short ball in the table will become a weakness, and Sriver is also very old, I recommend you Reifman Refoma is a little more expensive. If you want to be affordable, focus on 3 medium hard, the performance is good, close to the coat. Now the quality of Hurricane 3 is not good, it is still 729-08 at 45 degrees, the hardness is comparable, but it is lighter and more turning.

The second configuration is more durable on the reverse side.

I don't know much about black power, but I've seen people second-hand.

You can try to, it feels good, the speed is fast, and it's about the same!

There is no doubt that I choose i5+GTX550

Starting with the first generation of the i-series, Intel's CPU performance has surpassed that of AMD across the board. And the i5 2300 is the second generation of i-series CPUs, and AMD is a complete failure.

In terms of graphics cards, the gap between HD6850 and NV's GTX550 is not as big as that of the CPU. Personally, I prefer nvidia. Judging from the few cards I have used, I feel that the frame rate of the NV card is high, and the image quality of the AMD card is better.

Hello, in terms of extreme performance, it must be the first configuration to be better, and the total price is higher, but in terms of daily games or use, there is actually not much difference.

In terms of CPUs, both are contemporary flagship-level CPUs. The difference is in terms of architecture, the Skylake architecture of the i7 6700K uses a 14nm process, and the Haswell Refresh architecture of the i7 4790K is a 22nm architecture, relatively speaking, the i7 6700K has a lower heat and energy consumption ratio than the i7 4790K, but the performance gap is about 10%. **The gap is 200-300 yuan.

In terms of motherboards, they all belong to the mid-range motherboards, which are fully functional and have good stability in all aspects, which has little impact on the overall performance of the machine, and the gap is not large, with a price difference of about 100 yuan.

In terms of memory, DDR3 1866 and DDR4 2400 almost do not feel the performance gap, 8G** is about 20 yuan.

In terms of heat dissipation, Cairong B81 is very cost-effective.

In terms of hard drives, choosing to choose a big brand of 240G is currently a cost-effective choice, and it is recommended to choose Intel, Puket or Samsung.

In terms of graphics card, the GTX1060 is higher than the GTX970 in terms of performance, and has lower heat generation. In terms of graphics cards, it is recommended to buy new instead of old, and the price difference is only 100-200 yuan.

In terms of power supply, it is recommended to abandon the Great Wall and Huntkey. The Kingdee power supply of Zhenhua is more cost-effective, and it is the lowest in the DC-DC power supply, and your configuration is recommended to use a power supply rated at more than 500W and a 12V voltage power of more than 450W.

In terms of chassis, it is recommended to purchase a mid-tower chassis to facilitate heat dissipation, and the thickness of the plate is not lower than that of the chassis.

The total price of your above configuration chassis is nearly 7,000 yuan, and the following configuration is about 6,000 yuan.

Personally, I recommend that if you have enough money, you can choose the above two sets, and if you like overclocking and only seek extreme performance, then you should choose the first set. If the budget is limited, and the general use of personal recommendation is to use the combination of B85 + E3 1231V3, the graphics card with GTX1060 is no problem at all, so the total price is about 5000.

The performance is of course the first good, but **expensive.

The second one is basically not considered, if the second one is not as good, directly use e3v5 (i5 6500) + b150 + 1060 performance is much better, ** may be cheaper.

In fact, the current CPU is basically excessive, and it is basically enough to i5 6500 or more.

It has to be the first, and of course the price is also the first expensive.

The second one is not at all comparable to the first.