Using AI technology to monitor students in real time and apologize after being scolded, is everyone

I think so. BecauseIn today's society, you can see surveillance almost everywhere, whether it is in a parking lot, or in a shopping mall, whether it is in a school, or in a hospital, and even in a small supermarket, there are a lot of surveillanceNow even thenClassrooms are also beginning to be monitored for security. It feels like everybody is under surveillance

I remember when I was in school, I could always see the monitoring all the time, in the classroom, there was a smart campus, that is, the performance of the course and the students was recorded and left after class**, isn't this a veritable life under the monitoring?

More and more surveillance is being installed on the streets, every street, every side roadIn order to protect our safety, in order to protect justice, all surveillance has been put under a good name, so now a lot of surveillance is to be installed on the street, so what about us? Living under countless surveillance, you have to pay attention to your words and deeds, and under surveillance, your heart is always very awkward.

Needless to say, surveillance is indeed good for our lives, after all, surveillance allows us to know the truth of things and then give people a fair look. So we live under this surveillance, which has certain advantages, but also certain disadvantages. Only by calming down the mind can we deal with the relationship between surveillance and our lives.

Well, in the end, I have to summarize for you, I personally think that we are indeed living under surveillance, after allWhether we're in the classroom or walking down the street, there's always a monitor watching us all the timeAll these remind us to be careful about our words and deeds, and not to make some immoral actions at will.

Surveillance is necessary in public places, but it should not be installed in private places such as homes.

Don't think that we adults are free, in fact, we are under surveillance all the time. It's just that many times I don't know.

Pretty much, the current monitoring facilities are very advanced, and there are monitors in almost every place, but I feel that the appropriate personal space is conducive to the development of my own character.

There is surveillance in many public places, but it is not very useful, it is just to have a evidence to see the scene after the accident.

Many places are equipped with surveillance, whether it is a company or a general physical store, which is also to prevent theft or some accidents when the situation is known.

Now it's all under surveillance, who isn't under surveillance, and we had to install these for safety. Artificial intelligence is comprehensive.

Yes, don't we usually install surveillance when we go to work, and there is also monitoring when the car walks on the road, which is everywhere.

Students want to say no to the school's rules, how is it possible. Once the school has decided on the rules, it is more difficult for students to change them.

When schools set rules and regulations, they usually think that they are beneficial to students and school management, and rarely think deeply about whether they have violated students' rights.

It can be seen from the real-time monitoring of AL technology that the school is completely in their interests, and it is also taken for granted that it is beneficial for students to do soIt was implemented without consulting the students.

From the school's point of view, real-time monitoring of AL technology can facilitate the teacher's roll call and prevent students from skipping class. The school sees that this is not very convenient, it is conducive to school management, and reduces the pressure on school leaders and teachers, so this technology is perfect.

However, it never considers whether the student wants to or not, and whether it violates the student's right to privacy. When the school's teachers determine this measure, they will not consult the studentsAt the beginning of the school year, the students had to comply.

At this time, it is already a little late for students to say no, because the measures have come down, and the school has already spent money on AL technology real-time monitoring, and the technology has been used. At this time, the student says no, what do you think is the probability that the school will take care of you.

And the opinions of the students do not have much influence on the schoolAs long as this sentence allows you to study hard, it can gag the mouths of students and appease the hearts of some parents who want their sons to become Chan.

In addition, almost all children in China are afraid of teachers, and how many can bravely say no to teachers. Therefore, even if students are very dissatisfied with the school's regulations, they can only bear it silently and dare not resist, which is the sadness of hard education.

What can students say? When the teacher took our mobile phones and beat us, we didn't dare to speak. I can only bear it silently.

It is not necessarily that there are no students who say no, but they are not known, many schools have a suggestion box, but there are very few opinions that can be adopted, most students do not have the courage to say no, and those who have the courage to say no will not be adopted and valued, after all, in the eyes of students' parents and teachers, students are immature, they are all for the good of students, so on the surface, the result is that students have no chance to say no

Because this is the school's decision, and it may have passed the consent of the parents, the student will not dare to say anything more.

Students basically have no right to speak, parents and schools are discussing this matter, and students can only accept it silently.

Because students have always thought that surveillance is a safe existence, but they don't understand this. I just think it's true for them.

Because this is the school's decision, students don't dare to refute it, just like when the teacher criticized you when you were a child, do you dare to point at the teacher and resist.

Because it is a hard and fast rule of the school, it is normal for a person to have no way to compete with the school.

Science and technology are neutral, and whether it is the sadness of education or not, I think it still depends on its usefulness and method。Once AI is used on a large scale in the classroom,Monitoring student behavior is likely to be counterproductive。I would like to express my concern from the following points.

One: The student behavior monitored by AI is not necessarily real. In long-term AI surveillance, students' behavior can become deliberate.

Under these eyes, every answer and every hand raised by the student will be recorded by AI to form a kind of data assessment. The school and parents will also judge the student's learning performance based on this. For anyone, thisIt's like having a pair of eyes staring at you all the time, and anyone can feel uncomfortable, let alone a child.

Children change their behaviour in order to cope with surveillance. Where there is AI, you become well-behaved and studious, and where you don't have AI, you become another personIn the long run, the child's heart will be deformedIt is also not beneficial for education.

2. AI systems can never be perfect. A person has to go through a lot of things and make a lot of decisions in his life, and these are not things that data can accurately record and judge.

Many things are irrational, and if the data recorded by AI is used to measure the quality and quality of a student, this is not only the sorrow of education, but also the sorrow of mankind. Science and technology are created by human beings and cannot be countered by human beings.

Three: We should fully respect the wishes of studentsand cannot force them to do what adults think is right。Many of the ideas of adults are actually less innovative than those of children, and this is undoubtedly the case in this questionStrangling children's vitality and creativity is irresponsible for the future development of all mankind.

It is hoped that the relevant departments and educational institutions will seriously consider these reasons and make rational use of science and technology to improve education.

No, using AI to monitor students' behavior is to better educate children and let them better develop good habits, which is the icing on the cake

This kind of behavior is not the sorrow of education, but the fact that education and technology keep pace with the times, and use more scientific means to educate children.

It should be that education should be a pleasant process, and the process of making people happy to receive knowledge is indeed the sadness of education that can only rely on surveillance.

I really think that teachers should give trust to children. Constant monitoring does not keep students on the right path.

No, it turns out that when there was no AI to monitor students, most schools didn't also install monitoring, but it just went further.

Yes, the school is the place where the child grows up, AI monitoring is installed, is it still a normal life, will the child be happy?

This may have been developed to make it easier for teachers and to urge students to learn, but some people may not understand it.