Why does living in a building save face? Why does living in a building have more face than living in

Who said that living in a building has face, I think living in a bungalow now has face, you live in a bungalow now, it proves that your family still has land, there is a small yard, and the people who live in the building are poor and don't even have a yard.

I don't think that living in a building has face, but living in a single-family villa is more face-saving, which is a symbol of power and money, most people choose to live in a building, because the building is cheap.

In the past, people thought that living in a building was more advanced than living in a bungalow, but now it is different, and now there is an exclusive courtyard to live in a bungalow and a yard is the best building, like a birdcage, in fact, it is not necessarily a good road.

Whoever tells you that if you live in a building, you will have face, like the way we live in a building has no face, if you live in a villa, then you will have face.

But many years ago, many years ago, it was still very uncommon to live in a building, and it was rare to be expensive, so it was a good idea to live in a building, but now it should not be, and it is also a very common thing to live in a building.

Because the general bungalow is old, there is no bathroom, and the building has complete sanitary facilities, so it is considered that living in a building has face.

This is just a few people's opinion, just living in a bungalow and having a small yard of your own, which is more face-saving.

Why does living in a building save face? There is no certain amount to this, as long as you have peace of mind, I think it's okay.

What age is this, and this kind of statement is not tenable at all.

This question is too strange, I don't think the square has face, so what about living in villas, are some villas bungalows? Wouldn't that be more face-saving?

People who live in buildings feel that they have face than living in bungalows, in the final analysis, it is caused by the psychology of comparison, and they feel that living in buildings is superior to living in bungalows in all aspects, but such people don't want to think about it, no matter how big and high you live in a building, you also moved from the bungalow, so don't live in a building and live in a bungalow.

Because nowadays people think that if they live in a building, their social status will be improved a lot. In fact, it's just a psychological effect. Some people can even do anything for the sake of face.

But in fact, it is nothing in the eyes of others. Some of the people who live in bungalows are still big bosses. Therefore, we can't just look at the surface when looking at people.

You have to go into the depths of his heart to see through this person and understand this person.

It depends on how you understand it. For example, buildings have environmental advantages, but they are expensive. The bungalow is not as good as the building, in the northern winter need to use coal for heating, the sanitary environment is not as good as the building, but in terms of housing costs, it is much less than the building.

It depends on whether you are financially adequate. It can only be said that the advantages and disadvantages of economic conditions have nothing to do with face.

This has nothing to do with what house you live in If you are a person with a strong sense of vanity, you will feel that living in a building is better than a bungalow If you don't compare with others, there is not much vanity, then it is good to live in **.

This is just a personal opinion, different, living in a bungalow and living in a building, it's just a matter of what you want to live in.

Because only rich people live in buildings, and now there are high-rises, and high-rise buildings are much higher than living in multi-storey buildings. So it's better to live in a building than a bungalow.

You may say that living in a building makes you feel face-saving. Then I thought it was in a big city.

It may be a psychological reflex of people, and the building is more expensive than the square, so I will feel this way. But in fact, money, living in a bungalow is the highest level of housing, not everyone can live in it.

Living in a building has face, this is your personal opinion, and it may have something to do with your experience.

You think that the building is very clean, and the small citizen life is more obvious.

Living in a building has face, and what is the score of a fist band in the building, and now I don't want to live on the first floor to go to the building. That's the face of ordinary people who don't know each other. This is all a personal opinion, don't care what others think, I want to live in a building to have face.

Where to stay? There is also face in the Dharma belt, don't care what others think.

It is true that you have no face in living in a building, whether you buy it or build it yourself, it means that you have some money and ability!

Now people's living standards have improved, not only live in a building but also buy a car, in the past living in a building is just a yearning, now it has become a reality, it has nothing to do with whether there is a ability, as long as you live a good life can live in a building.

Housing prices, now the building is high, and the economy is good for what can be bought, so there is such a saying, but how to say it, live your own life, regardless of what others think.

Hello, this is because of the current housing prices, if you buy a building, it generally means that there is a certain economic foundation, so it will be said that living in a building, indicating a little money, but in fact, it is not necessarily.

Because of this, housing prices are now very high, and people who can afford to buy a house should belong to the wealthy. If you look at a random house outside, it is hundreds of thousands and millions of dollars.

Agree with the landlord's point of view, sometimes people are blindly following the trend, so the public has fulfilled their savings to the developer, and helped the market push up the housing prices all the way, and then look at the people who can't afford to buy a building in the future, and a sense of superiority rises... Lamentable...

Actually, bungalows are better, but do bungalows have them? If so, can you afford it?

With enough money, we would still choose the villa.

Qi is a collective noun that "refers to unidentified objects in general", so we don't have to be stupid enough to define "what is qi".

The Chinese "qi" is a very simple concept, that is: there is a thing, I don't know what it is, it is called qi. And popularity refers to the energy that people will retain in the house for a period of time, but the ancestors don't know what they are, they only know that if people stay in the house, the house will have qi, and if they don't live for too long, there will be no such people's qi.

Relatively speaking, any unclean gas will take over the house. So the ghosts will take advantage of the void and move in. After these unclean yin qi come in, the house is very easy to break, because the yang qi of the reinforced concrete will be sucked away by the ghost, and the whole building will be broken off "yang longevity".

That's why the old man said that the house should be often occupied and popular. In this way, the house is not easy to break, and it is not easy to attract yin. This can also explain why many urban real estate (cancer cells grow wildly) enterprises are now feverish and have to build buildings, ** will call empty houses that no one lives in "ghost towns".

The popularity referred to is just a psychological feeling, and the house that has not lived for a long time always gives people a dark and cold feeling. It's kind of that kind of meaning, you don't understand.

Popularity is the breath of people, and there should be many people. No one wants to live in a deserted place, first of all, the supporting facilities in the place with few people can't keep up, and it's not convenient to do anything--- go to school, shopping, medical treatment, travel, etc. For example, there are such problems in new urban areas.

It's going to be a long process.

Looking at the region, there are only more buildings in the city, and the relative facilities of the buildings are more convenient, safe and hygienic than others.

Because most of the buildings are in the city, it is very convenient nearby. Wish.

I like to have a yard, probably because it's more face-saving, it's more convenient.

How big of a garden do you have to buy in a big city?

Why can't the elderly live in a new building Compare your heart to your heart If it were your biological parents, would you still hate it Although an outsider can't understand the family situation of other people's families and how they get along with them, but I think everyone has a time when they are old They pull their children up They don't want to do anything and don't need to report I just hope that when I get old, I can have a home and a place to live Isn't this the least requirement possible The old people are old There may be many living habits that are different from those of young people and they will not be used to each other But they all have to understand each other Be more humble Less care, don't blindly ask, the less you care, wouldn't life be happier?