Tamron 18 200 for Nikon 55 200 is not worth it

Updated on number 2024-04-14
7 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Change it, make up 150 What your parents should agree to (it's all a white toss caused by fat people) Nikon has anti-shake on both heads, and the 200-end aperture is larger, and the success rate of shooting is definitely higher.

    Although Tamron has a macro, the usage rate of macro is definitely much lower than that of telephoto for you.

    How good can a lens with more than 10x zoom be? Both of Nikon's are only 3 times as large.

    As a fan of N, there is no lens of N...The original factory is the original factory, and Tenglong is just a deputy factory.

    Needless to say, mine it!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The 55-200 is Nikon's cheapest VR head, which is cheap and high-quality, and belongs to the low-end one. So, if you add 18-55, it's still worth changing, 19-200 is a shot to go all over the world, a bit amateurish, so 18-55 and 55-200 are still good.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It's not worth it, no matter how bad your image is, it's convenient.

    Even if you change it to 55 200 18 55, no matter how good the imaging is, it is still a Nikon bad lens level.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    If I were resolute, I wouldn't change it

    1,18-200 is the same as 18-55+55-200 focal length, and the imaging effect of the latter is hardly better than that of Tamron, and it is troublesome to change lenses.

    2. The head of Tenglong has a large magnification, a certain macro function, and a larger aperture.

    3. When the light is not good, the stabilization only improves the probability of a certain clear imaging, and the shooting in low-light environment requires a large aperture or tripod to be the correct solution, and the telephoto end should rely on the tripod.

    4. Generally speaking, it is reasonable to change 18-55+55-200 to 18-200 - and make up money? Be careful that you've really been fooled, and of course that's my opinion.

    5, as for the amateur of one shot in the world, it is also amateur.

    6. Don't change it, keep using it, use it well.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Nikon's 18-55 and 55-200 are both good value for money, and imaging sharpness and other things are very good. If you're not afraid of trouble, it's totally worth it.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Tamron's latest lens of this specification is also the A025 launched in 2017, the full name of Tamron SP70-200mm DI VC USD G2. There are two mounts for this lens, the Nikon mount and the Canon mount. If you want to match the D500 with a lens, then choose this lens from Nikon.

    This lens has excellent optical quality, powerful image stabilization, and excellent cost performance.

    Tamron SP70-200MM di VC USD G2

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    He actually just 200 presses should be able to get it for you. My dad's ratio efficiency is still very good, and this should be a direct match.

Related questions
14 answers2024-04-14

For beginners, 18-105 is enough, and the image quality of this lens is not bad in the sleeve. >>>More

11 answers2024-04-14

All three have macros. The order in which it appears is 582d, a17, a17nii. In fact, the A17 is a digital version of the previous version, and the model has a motor added to the N-port A17, which is specially prepared for N machines such as D40, D40X, and D60 without a fuselage motor. >>>More

15 answers2024-04-14

The 17-50 strength is constant, the aperture is placed at f4, the image quality is very good, and the 17-85 focal length is relatively wide, which is suitable for the hanging head, but the image quality is a little fleshy compared to the lens of the Tenglong.

10 answers2024-04-14

If you take portraits, you can't talk about it without a fixed focus......Especially the indoor portrait or something. >>>More

19 answers2024-04-14

18-200 is the most convenient travel head, of course, ** is not expensive, about 4500. >>>More