A and B fight, B makes the first move, A runs away, B calls the police, I wonder what would happen i

It is better to go to the public security bureau to turn himself in, and the other party can also be punished lightly if he is at fault, so that he may not need to be detained, fined a few hundred, and compensated for some medical expenses.

As a result, if you go to the Public Security Bureau, the mediation result is that A accompanies money to B, and who calls B's father's brother a policeman.

It's okay to admit it, but if you don't accompany you, you will be detained, in the bureau you beat you half to death, or miss to die, it's okay to beat half dead, kill it, please listen to the next decomposition ......

There should be nothing to do, just pay him for the medical bills, don't worry.

Two people mediate first, and if they fail to mediate, they will be detained, and both are responsible.

How can the landlord be A, the mother-in-law must be his GF.

Whoever does it first will be private. Bear with me, who told people to know Bai Dao

I am from Shandong Huimin, the traffic police here are really black, we have a saying; I'd rather go around the earth than go to Huimin County! Drivers should be careful! The common people here call some of the policemen two devils, which is the fault of the Japanese back then, alas, corruption!

The landlord won't be A, haha.

A is not afraid, it's good to fight again! Kill this time!

A is so stupid, you see how smart people B are and call the police when they hit someone!

Although A intentionally injured B, after he committed the crime, he wanted to flee the scene, and he no longer had a substantial threat to B. If a passer-by stops him and takes him to the police station, this is an act of righteousness and courage, and it is to be vigorously praised and rewarded.

However, if A is injured based on righteous indignation, it does not have the elements of justifiable defense and excessive defense, and it is an intentional infringement of the body of another person.

A passerby violated the Public Security Administration Punishment Law.

If you beat A, the injury is not serious, and you can also be exempted from liability.

If A is hit very severely, reaching the level of minor injury or serious injury, etc., the passerby will still be held responsible. It may be administrative detention or a penalty of less than 500 yuan, and bear A's medical expenses.

Based on A's illegal action in advance, it is estimated that passers-by will be dealt with lightly.

As for the illegal infringement of A against B, it will be handled in a separate case, and the punishment will generally be severe.

Article 43 Whoever assaults another person or intentionally injures another person shall be detained for not less than 5 days but not more than 10 days and shall also be fined not less than 200 yuan but not more than 500 yuan; where the circumstances are more minor, they are to be detained for up to 5 days or fined up to 500 RMB.

In any of the following circumstances, they are to be detained for between 10 and 15 days and fined between 500 and 1,000 RMB: (1) Forming a group to beat or injure others; (2) Beating or injuring a disabled person, a pregnant woman, a person under the age of 14, or a person over the age of 60; (3) Repeatedly beating or injuring others, or beating or injuring multiple people at a time.

It should be determined according to the degree of injury of a, and wounding a does not belong to acts of righteousness and courage!

Regardless of whether A consents or not, B causes harm to A and B is primarily responsible.

In this case, A provoked first, and fought back after receiving B's attack (rather than self-defense), so he also bears secondary responsibility.

If it is handled at the police station, it will generally be recommended to settle and B will compensate A for a certain amount of medical expenses.

If the two parties fail to settle and go to the court to deal with it, they will still bear all the costs according to the proportion of B primary responsibility and A secondary responsibility according to the severity of the situation.

As long as whoever does this, it has already constituted a criminal offense, and can be punished according to a degree of punishment for a criminal offense, and you can choose to call the police, as long as it is an adult, what are you afraid of? Now Ye'an is so good, it really is. Just ask him, even if he is in high school, as long as he is 16 years old, what is it?

You can call the police. I can't beat you, you just go and fight, I don't want to reconcile with you. Take a 15-day detention and put the security in custody.

A is seriously injured, and B, C, D, and E are joint crimes, and they are sentenced to 3-10 years in prison.

b. C The active participant is the principal offender and the sentence should be more than 6 years. The person directly responsible for blinding the aeye shall also bear the main responsibility and shall be sentenced to more than 6 years.

d. E is an accomplice who shall be sentenced to about 3 years.

A is responsible for B's injuries. Look at the treatment of the injury.

There is no legitimacy in fighting each other, and whoever injures someone is responsible. b

It's a big deal. Because A is considered disabled, B and C will be focused, C may be heavier, ED will definitely be sentenced, and mediation is not light.

Article 234 of the Criminal Law Whoever intentionally injures the body of another person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release. Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph, causing serious injury, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years; Whoever causes death or seriously injures a person by especially cruel means, causing serious disability, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years, life imprisonment, or death. Where this Law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.

An accomplice to the crime of intentional injury.

Zongheng Legal Network Guizhu lawyer.

Summary. Because there is no necessary causal relationship between A bringing someone over and B hitting you.

A brought B over to meet me, and B started beating me, so is A responsible?

Wait, dear.

Well. Dear, A is not responsible.

Because there is no necessary causal relationship between A bringing someone over and B hitting you.

Unless there is some agreement between them.

Then they will be characterized as joint criminals.

The same responsibility will be borne by you.

Then I suspect he brought his friends to beat me.

Do you have conclusive evidence?

The question is who I don't know.

Dear, there is no way to do it, the law is about evidence, if there is no definite evidence, then it has nothing to do with A.

The problem is that A came with B.

Dear, this act of bringing you here has nothing to do with you being beaten, and he has no responsibility to ensure that B does not hit you.

So legally he is not responsible.

I probably understood, and when I said that I took my friend to beat someone, I didn't do it and I wouldn't be responsible.

If the other party doesn't have evidence that you didn't plan ahead with each other.

You're not responsible.

I get it. But it's better not to do it and use the law to solve the problem.

If you don't have any other questions, can you give a thumbs up?,Thank you.,Hahahaha.