If you want to buy a camera, what is the difference between the Olympus EP2 and the Panasonic GF3? I

Let me give you the answer

The GF3 is a model developed by Panasonic to reduce the size of the fuselage. The body is very thin and compact, and the functions are as family-oriented as possible, touch focusing, and it is very simple to use.

The ep2 is a high-end model from Olympus, and although it is a little older, it is still powerful in terms of functionality. The volume and weight are both greater than GF3, but you mentioned the problem of bright colors, then this is the biggest difference between Olympus and Panasonic mirrorless systems. The disadvantage of Panasonic's mirrorless is that the color directly produced by JEPG is too simple, while Olympus's mirrorless lens not only has a good direct color, but also has a lot of different style filters in the camera, which can shoot a lot of different styles**.

So according to your hope, you should choose Olympus's mirrorless, as for EP2, if you are a little older, you can choose EPL3 and EP3.

EP2 has a more beautiful appearance, in addition, the operation and feel are also better, the default color is beautiful and bright, and the GF3 is more compact, touch the screen. But there is a problem with EP2 that it is older, and the focus is not as fast as the EP3 and EPL3 that come out now.

It is not recommended that the landlord buy a micro order, the micro mirror is a new product at present, the market is not very mature, and the relative accessories are relatively few, the power consumption is large, the image quality is not very good, and the focus is a big problem. Relatively speaking, it is better to have a single-lens reflex and card, the market is more mature, the cost performance is relatively high, ** is also acceptable, the functions are very complete, the picture quality is also outstanding, and the owner of the tower considers taking a look

My sort, Sony NEX7> Sony NEX5N> Sony NEC3, Panasonic GX1, Olympus EP3> Olympus EPL3> Olympus EPM1> Panasonic GF3, Samsung's additional.

GF3 has a touch screen that supports touch focus, touch release shutter, and the composition is more free and casual. It's easier to use.

EPL3 has a flip screen, which is equivalent to an extra waist-level viewfinder and does not support touch focus shooting. Low angles and high angles are more convenient.

Of course, it is best to have EP3, anti-shake, flip touch, and hot shoe flash. It's the fuselage** doubled...

Personally, I think it's better for girls to choose GF3, with a large aperture fixed focus and X14-42, which is very portable.

If you are a boy, G3 or GH2 is recommended, which is more comprehensive and professional.

The E-PL3 is better, and the image quality of Oba and the power of the lens are not comparable to Panasonic.

There are, if the quality of the head is about the same, the parallel gf3 head is 2700... How do you choose, and Panasonic is lens stabilization, and Olympus is body stabilization.

I have the same questions as the landlord.,I've been doing multiple-choice questions on these two machines.。 The main one is Panasonic's double sleeve 2899 Olympus sleeve 2999. I think the double-head is a good deal, but the Olympus body is anti-shake and more operable.

Panasonic is cheaper, EPL3 will be better. For girls, I recommend buying GF3

It seems that they can all touch focus, at least GF3, and the image sensor is basically the same, and the difference in imaging is negligible.

In view of the fact that LZ is a girl, which one do you think is good-looking, don't be entangled, what you like is the highest cost performance.

Olympus adopts high-tech technology and introduces advanced science and technology, and its products are naturally top-notch.

My sort, Sony NEX7> Sony NEX5N> Sony NEC3, Panasonic GX1, Olympus EP3> Olympus EPL3> Olympus EPM1> Panasonic GF3, Samsung's additional.

Upstairs is a lot of comparisons in place, I add:

1. GF2 does not have body stabilization, while EPL2 does, not only that, but Olympus' anti-shake technology is also first-class.

2. From the perspective of the lens, the fixed focus of GF2 is good, but the 14-42 of EPL2 is not bad. However, the prime head should not be used as well as the zoom head. Olympus' lens group is larger than that of Panasonic, and the lens of the M43 is common to both machines, but it will be difficult to use a normal manual head on the GF2 without image stabilization.

By the way, the Sony NEX-5C can also be considered, after all, it is APS-C, and the playability is also quite high.

As for GF2 and EPL2....I think it's better to buy an EPL1, you can use the money you save to buy lenses.

That's about the price. The best is the Panasonic LX3, followed by the Ricoh GX200, the Nikon P6000 again, and the Canon S90. That's more than $2,500.

Within two thousand dollars: the best Fujifilm F300, Fujifilm F85, Panasonic FX180

It's true that you don't have high requirements, but to meet your requirements, rely on technology, not cameras.

Canon 130, I just bought it a few days ago, I bought it at Gome Electric, it's not bad, the market price is 1987 yuan. 14 million pixels quadruple focal length! You've met your requirements and it's pretty easy to use!

The overall performance of the Olympus EPL3 and the Panasonic GF3 is similar, with small differences in design ideas and a little difference in emphasis.

EPL3 body stabilization, any lens is connected to have image stabilization, (except for Pentax Q, the only mirrorless with body stabilization,) There is a flip screen, there is a flash hot shoe, and there are more physical buttons, for people who have played SLR, EPL3 is more suitable.

The Olympus EPL3 image quality is slightly better, but after all, it is the same sensor, but the Olympus optimization is slightly better, and this gap is completely negligible. Panasonic's default imaging style is slightly yellow, with Japanese style, depending on personal preference.

In Japan, Olympus EPL3 is similar to Panasonic GF3's, the mainland channel is different, and Olympus is generally a little more expensive.

It is not recommended for beginners to use only a prime lens, because it will not be easy for you to understand the relationship between focal length and angle of view, and it will be more troublesome in many situations, although the prime lens will theoretically have a slightly better image quality (the difference is very small). The 14-42 lens will be enough for most scenes, well, Olympus, remember to choose the third generation (suffix is II).

By the way, the only native macro lens of the M4 3 is the Leica 45 of Panasonic, Leica Mark, the selling price is about 5000, and I personally recommend choosing Olympus's ED 12-50 EZ, which also has a good macro performance, and the wide-angle end is wide enough, so there is no pressure to shoot landscapes or anything.

It is recommended to be decisive GF2. The main considerations are as follows:

1. You say that your level is not even amateurish, for such users, if you don't plan to "learn photography", just want to have a tool to record life, then SLR is recommended to pass, after all, there are more functions and buttons, not suitable for users who pursue simplicity.

2. The remaining two, because the touch screen of GF2 is really convenient, it is recommended for users who pursue ease of use. By touching the sliders and buttons on the screen, functions such as background blur and focus adjustment can be operated intuitively and conveniently, and in addition, it is also moderate: EPL1 is the first generation of mirrorless camera, and it feels that it is not fashionable enough to hold it in your hand; The main performance of GF2 is almost the same as GF3, and the dual-lens version** is about the same as the 500D dog head cover machine, so I personally feel that the cost performance is still very high.

I recommend Canon's 500D, after all, this is a DSLR, in terms of the quality of the camera, the larger the image sensor, the better the camera, so among these 3 choices, Canon's SLR is the largest image sensor, of course, the film is also the highest quality and the best. **It's not expensive to only 4000 yuan of the set, and the film is definitely more than the other 2 you listed.

If you enter the circle of interchangeable lens cameras, you will continue to spend money in the future, and it is impossible to do it in one step. Look at your budget, if you choose this, you must be the best500d, after all, the SLR is more real than the single point, but it's a bit outdated. It's all 600d now.

If you like photography and want to toss it for 500d, it's generally easier to get started with GF2. As for the image quality, the SLR is definitely superior, and it depends more on the lens. And the picture quality of GF2 is not bad at all.,At least it's much better than the card.,I used GF2 to shoot **.。

FYI.

It's definitely GF2, because Panasonic is the number one brand in Japan! And the lens is also German Laika's! It's not that the data can show it, if you have time to look at the sample on the Internet, you will know how powerful she is!

According to the experience of the landlord, I recommend buying GF2, the SLR is too out, GF2 has a beautiful appearance, simple touch operation, and the focus is quite fast, just suitable for novices.

Depending on what you need, if you want to be able to produce RAW format, then it's better to choose Canon. Because Canon's RAW format is better supported by Lightroom and Photoshop.

If you have a budget of around 3500, then it is better to go G12. Because its operation is closer to that of a DSLR. Quite convenient.

The camera in the same class of Olympus should be the XZ-1The imaging is also quite good. **Also around 3500.

Panasonic is LX5

3 Taichung I recommend G12 because it is the most balanced. It is also the most convenient to operate.

The best imaging should be XZ-1You'll know it when you actually use it. Slightly stronger than the G12. But it's also close. After all, it's not a DSLR.

If you want to be cheap and the performance is passable, then choose Canon's ixus115

This is the DC with the largest sales volume. The effect of night shooting is also okay. It is the cheapest DC equipped with an HS system in Canon. **With invoice with 4G card, about 1500.

To be honest, I don't think it's very cost-effective to buy G12 or the like, and the ** of 3500 can buy a SLR after all.

The worst DSLR is also better than DC's imaging!

Single-lens and mirrorless lenses are not recommended, because compared to SLR lenses of the same level, their lenses are now too expensive.

Canon G series, G12 shape is stylish enough, and it is claimed to be a quasi-professional-grade compact camera.

The performance of the Canon G series is a little more stable, and I use Canon's one.

J1 I don't think there is a need to compare, although the performance of the 1 series is good, but it is not a very mature mirrorless system. I don't think it's too necessary for a DSLR. 4 3 system is now the most complete mirrorless system.

In fact, the cheapest and most easy to use is the GF2's double-ended set of machines, the fixed focus combination of 14-42 and 14, which is actually enough for shooting landscapes and daily shooting. If it's like taking portraits, it can be like a Panasonic 20 double set of ** is now about 3600, which is cheaper. In addition, you can also choose the body of Olympus EPL3 or GF3, GF5 has just been launched, and it can also be considered in the future.

It's good that the lens is enough. Don't be too demanding.