Ask a law topic, ask a law question online

Updated on educate 2024-04-07
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Crime suspension is when the offender takes the initiative to completely stop the criminal act or actively prevent the occurrence of the criminal outcome, so it can occur at every stage of the crime.

    a. Crimes of negligence do not take an intentional form.

    b Indirect intent means that such a result is allowed to occur, and if there is a preparatory stage, it is premeditated, and it is an intentional crime. There should be no distinction between an attempted attempt to complete indirect intent, only between established and unestablished.

    c A crime of negligence would not have been established without the result of the crime, so there is no distinction between completed and attempted.

    If there is any inappropriateness, please correct.

    According to the first paragraph of Criminal Law article 24, "In the course of committing a crime, the crime is suspended if the crime is voluntarily abandoned or the outcome of the crime is automatically and effectively prevented." The most important feature of criminal suspension is that the perpetrator subjectively renounces the intention to commit the crime.

    Criminal preparation is a state of cessation of the unfinished crime in the course of an intentional crime, which refers to the act in which the perpetrator begins to create conditions for the commission of the crime, and fails to start the criminal act due to reasons other than the will of the perpetrator. A wants to enter B's house in the middle of the night to commit a burglary, but suddenly gets scared halfway through It is obvious that he has not yet been able to commit the crime, and the reason that causes him to stop committing the crime is fear, and if he is not afraid, A will continue to commit the crime, so it is a suspension of the crime in preparation for the crime.

    A case from the China Court Network is typical).

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The form of preparation for a crime is defined as a form that begins in the planning phase of a crime and begins before the commission of the crime begins.

    Suspension of a crime, on the other hand, refers to the termination of the criminal act due to subjective reasons on the part of the perpetrator after the crime has been committed.

    The temporal cut-off point is not the same, so by definition, there is no possibility of a crime suspension in the preparatory stage.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Summary. Dear, tell me about your affairs, and I will help you make suggestions and solve problems

    Dear, tell me about your affairs, dismantle the sedan chair and sail Xiang, and I will help you make suggestions and solve problems

    I would like to ask a question about the law of the third year of high school, why is d the main letter question 1The house is on the way to change the registration, so it should be scattered and not registered, so should it still be owned by Xu Moumou, isn't that owned by his son Xu Peng? Wan should not belong to Xu Peng and Kong equally divided 3

    Is a will invalid if it does not have more than two witnesses? Hidden digging wheels

    3.No two witnesses are invalid.

    Because it's smaller, I'm struggling to watch, so I'm going to spend some time, and the third question is no. The witnesses to the question must be two.

    Okay, okay, trouble.

    First question. Testamentary succession is higher than statutory succession.

    Xu's will attributed the property to his son and ex-wife. Pilu then except. to Kong's common property. His property was given to his ex-wife and son.

    Question 2. Yes, in general, it is evenly distributed.

    Compensation is given to close relatives. The wife and son are close relatives. Xu and Kong also received a marriage certificate and are a legal husband and wife.

    Thank you, then in this topic, the will is invalid, so how to divide this house?

    In accordance with the order of legal succession.

    Article 1127 of the Civil Code stipulates that the inheritance of the estate shall be in the following order: (1) the first order: spouse, children, parents;

    The house is Xu Moumou's premarital property, and then he agreed to marry Kong Moumou and change it to joint ownership, but he died on the way to (then Changbi did not change the hall Qin, the house as a real estate needs to change the property rights), so Kong Fu leak is not able to divide the house? (The questions in the third year of high school are too difficult to understand <>.)

    Yes, subject to property registration.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The crime of embezzlement refers to the act of illegally taking possession of another person's property, forgotten property, or buried property for one's own custody for the purpose of illegal possession, and refusing to return it to the owner of a relatively large amount. The object of this crime is limited to three types of property: first, the property of others in custody; the second is the forgotten things of others, and the forgotten things are not equal to the lost things, nor are they the same as the abandoned things; The third is the buried objects of others.

    Combined with this case, the contract between Zhao and Wang should have constituted a contract of employment and freight, rather than custody, and Wang did not forget his own property, let alone buried objects, so it was incorrect to convict him of embezzlement.

    It should be the crime of theft, and the crime of theft refers to the act of secretly stealing public or private property for the purpose of illegal possession, in a relatively large amount, or repeatedly stealing public or private property. In this case, Zhao took advantage of the king's inattention for the purpose of illegal possession, that is, secretly resisted the king's property, and the amount involved was relatively large, and he was at least 16 years old, which met the main requirements and constituted the crime of theft.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Guilty of theft.

    Zhao took advantage of Wang's inattention to carry Wang's luggage, which was an act of transferring other people's property by secret means, and because Wang did not know, Zhao was found guilty of theft.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    constitutes the crime of theft.

    Zhao was the assistant person of possession of the king, and he did not have the right to possess the luggage, so the crime of embezzlement was not established.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Escalate the accusation, freeze the debtor's bank card to repay in installments, and there is no way to come out of the court at once

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    1.If the claim is waived and the lawsuit is equivalent to a complaint, it may be sued again2After the application for withdrawal is reviewed, it may be handled as a withdrawal if the conditions are met. Of course, it is also possible to appeal again.

    3.If the conditions are met, the court may prepare a mediation document based on the contents.

    4.There is no violation, and the court has ascertained the truth.

Related questions
6 answers2024-04-07

The answer is C, analyze and press the method, the place is the subject, followed by the bridge is supposed to be built, it can be seen that it is the postposition of the place to modify it, according to its definite is a sentence, you can judge that at which, and should be is followed by a sentence, so use where, remember that the meaning of where and at which is used is equivalent, In the future, the question is judged by whether the modifier is a sentence, and if so, use at which or where

17 answers2024-04-07

The decimal part of the root number 2 is a wireless non-cyclic decimal and cannot be written, just like pi. >>>More

23 answers2024-04-07

In the first step, square both sides of the equation; In the second step, the two sides of the equation are simplified, and the final result is 1 cos squared -1 on the left and tan squared on the right. In the third step, both sides are multiplied by the square of cos, and then the term is shifted, so that the square of the isoidant sin + the square of cos = 1. So the scope of finding the original problem is to find the intersection of the solutions of the three equations -sin +sin >0; 3. Tan makes sense. You'll do it

26 answers2024-04-07

Absolutely.

And there's a good chance you're better than those law undergraduates. Because of this, you have the advantage that you can better understand some of the concepts of law in the collision of sparks between different disciplines. Undergraduate law students may be limited by their own knowledge and it is difficult to make a big breakthrough. >>>More

5 answers2024-04-07

In fact, if you can't understand the diagram for this question, you can complete the diagram first. As you can see, this is a projection of the South Pole as the center. >>>More