Is it better for my mother in law to help with the children or to bring them myself?

Is it better for my mother-in-law to help take care of the children or bring them myself? If you have time, of course, it is better to take the child by yourself, after all, you are the child's mother, if you don't have time to go to work, of course, it is the mother-in-law to help take it. You can ask your mother-in-law to help you take it during the day, sleep with the baby at night, and try to spend as much time with the baby as possible after work.

If you feel that your mother-in-law's way of managing your children is incorrect, you can communicate with your mother-in-law, and you can usually talk to your mother-in-law about the ways and means of others taking care of your baby that you see on the Internet. Remember to respect your mother-in-law, and your mother-in-law is also kind, but her mother-in-law is older, and her methods of raising children can't keep up with the new form. It is not easy for a mother-in-law to take care of a baby.

Nothing is better or worse, it's just that different choices have different sacrifices and gains, and there are gains and losses. If you want to find a job, you need someone to help take care of the baby, either you and your husband have the ability to hire a nanny, and if you can't afford the elderly, you can also take them if you are free, at least they are more trustworthy than a nanny. What you need to do is to try to change your thinking, don't always think that the way the elderly take the baby is not right, the older generation has many ways to have their reasons for existence, but young people don't understand, now you are also a mother You can experience it from a different angle, you must learn to treat them with a grateful heart, set a good example for your children, and you can also become a gentler and better mother and wife.

If you think that the way your in-laws take care of the baby is not good, just find a free job, of course, the salary should not be so high, so that you can get off work early and take care of the baby yourself, especially in terms of academics, try to teach your young parents. The role of the mistress in the family is very important, learn to change your thinking and emotions, don't let them go crazy, there are only disadvantages and no good.

If you are able to do so, it is better to take your child until the age of 2 or 3 and then go to kindergarten. It is good for the elderly to take care of children, but the next generation is more doting on the next generation, and there is a big difference in education. They all use the education methods of the older generation.

Infants and toddlers are very important in terms of diet and education before the age of three, after all, young people are quick to accept new things, and the educational concept is different from that of the elderly. Therefore, it is better for the child to bring it by himself. Of course, if the conditions do not allow it, you have to go out to work, so you have to be led by the elderly.

Some methods should be explained clearly to the elderly, and it is okay. But you have a good attitude and must have a good relationship with the elderly to avoid conflicts.

It's better to bring it yourself, because the mother-in-law and you bring the two education methods are different, if you are not so nervous at work, then bring your own, if you are very tired at work and have no time to bring, then ask your mother-in-law to help you bring, alas, the methods of education for the elderly are ancient, not modern, so it is difficult for children to educate well.

Light ink window.

For this question, according to my own conditions, I must want to bring it myself. However, the situation of each family is different, so I can only give you an example of the problem and make a small suggestion.

Whether to bring it yourself or to bring it by your mother-in-law is a headache for young mothers.

The reasons for the entanglement are none other than the following.

One is that as a woman, I really don't want to give up my job because of taking care of children.

The other is the generation gap, the older generation, many living habits, concepts are different from the younger generations, let them take children, it is inevitable that they will do it in the way they have been, and it is likely that they will spoil the children very much, resulting in the children growing into bear children in people's mouths.

The third is the eternal topic of the relationship between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law. Most mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law have many irreconcilable contradictions. And when it comes to how to educate children, there will be a lot of disagreement.

But the problem should always be solved, and there must be a choice.

So, let's consider it from the aspect of children's education, after all, it is the responsibility and desire of parents to cultivate children into talents.

Although women's independence is advocated by many people nowadays, it is really not an easy thing to achieve when it comes to solving practical problems.

But I think it's best to take your children with you. At least for the first two years, you have to bring it yourself. When your child is ready to go to kindergarten, you can be liberated for a few hours of the day, but you can't relax your studies and disconnect yourself from society.

In fact, it's really hard for others to say anything about this question, because there are many factors involved, and others don't know your situation. In terms of education, we have to take care of it ourselves and consider it in light of the actual situation.

It's better to bring it yourself, and then you go out to work when the child is older, taking the child can be the only job for the mother, if the child is sick or has any adverse reactions, you are also restless at work.

I think it's best to bring your own children when they are young, you can rest assured that you can bring your own children, young people and old people with children are not the same, and the child is really who to bring with whom, if you go to work, he is estranged from you, you will be very sad, wait for the child to be older and then look for a job.

In this matter, if you are a workaholic and enterprising person, then you can ask your mother-in-law to help you take care of the children, and you also have to work hard and spend more time with the children.

If you don't go to work for a while, then you might as well take care of your own children.

In that way, the child can be fed at any time without losing weight, and the old man and your mother-in-law are not so tired.

Mother-in-law to help take the child or bring it yourself, if you have time or bring it yourself, mother-in-law education is good, too doting on the child, education is not good, in other things to educate the child is better, can educate the child better, so if you have the conditions or bring it yourself, then you have no way to bring the mother-in-law.

It's better to bring your own.

The relationship between yourself and your child will be closer, and it will be better for your child's future development. Children can have a broader horizon.

Of course, if the mother-in-law takes it, it will be easier for me and I will have more time to do what I want to do.

If you can't, it's best to find a job close to home and not working for a long time every day.

If your mother-in-law's concept of education and parenting is not particularly backward, and feudal superstition, you can hand over the child to your mother-in-law, and then your mother-in-law is mainly responsible for the day, and the child is still brought by you and your husband at night. You have to go to work sooner or later, and now the children are not sensible and do not need much education. When it comes to kindergarten and elementary school, that's when you really need to focus on education.

In life, it is difficult to go smoothly in everything, so there is a saying that the mother-in-law takes care of the child, you don't worry, if you take the child by yourself, you lose the work, it is really difficult to have both, so you have to think about it, is there a strategy for the best of both worlds? Make arrangements for taking care of the children and your own work.

If the family is wealthy, you can bring it yourself, and if you need to live, you can still take it with your mother-in-law, so that at least you can work and have an extra income.

Of course, it is better to take care of your own children, because you can understand your children better when you have children, and you can increase the feelings between them, so if you have the ability, try your own children.

According to the normal situation, if you have time, it is better to take the children by yourself, after all, the gap between the generations is still relatively large, and the impact on the children is great.

After all, there is a generation gap between the educational philosophy of the elderly and the young, and it is easy to have contradictions in education.

It's better to bring it yourself, and the hard child will be closer to you, I was my grandmother who brought me up, and then I now have a bad relationship with my mother, and I often quarrel, my brother was brought up by my mother since he was a child, and then the relationship between the two of them is very good.

If you have a job as a mother, then it is okay to let your mother-in-law help take care of the children occasionally.

If you are a stay-at-home mother, then you can take care of the children yourself.

Now a lot. You are aware of the importance of having children on your own. Weather permitting.

If you come over, or do you bring your own? A little better. Mother-in-law or grandmother bring it.

Intergenerational parenting can also be overly pampered or too strict. It can create a shadow in the child's heart.

This kind of thing is a give-and-take, and it is difficult to take care of it. I think that after giving birth, I can take care of my child full-time for two years, which can be of great help to the child's development, and then I can think about work.

It is better to bring it yourself, and the educational philosophy of the elderly and young people is different.

If the family conditions are okay, it is recommended to take the children by yourself, so that the relationship with the children is deeper.

Bring it yourself, the conditions are good, if you don't have money, your mother-in-law will bring it, and you will go out to make money by yourself.

If there is a condition, of course, it is better to bring it yourself, because the child is closer to the mother.

Personally, I think it's better to bring it myself, and my mother-in-law ...... after allThere is a generation gap.

It's better to bring it yourself, because there are ten children.

There must be their own way, it's good to take the children by yourself, grandma and grandpa bring them are already old, they are not the same as the children brought by young people, the old people are used to children,

It depends on the situation, and it is better to take care of the children yourself. There are certain drawbacks to bringing children from the next generation.

It is also possible to have your own business with children. Now there are many micro-businesses or live broadcasts.

Summary. If the economy is good, it is better for the child to bring it himself, because the elderly are very spoiled and will be lawless, after all, they can educate their children better, and it is better to communicate with each other.

It is better for the child to take the mother-in-law to work by himself, or to take the child by himself.

If the economy is good, it is better for the child to bring it himself, because the elderly are very spoiled and will be lawless, after all, they can educate their children better, and it is better to communicate with each other.

It is best to bring the child by yourself, and the best parent-child time in this life is from 0 to 13 years old, after which the child lives in school. Go to junior high school, high school, and college. Even if you don't live in junior high school, because at this stage of growth and development, the child's personality begins to rebel, and even if you want to get close and make up for it, you have no chance.

At this time, the child is no longer "close" to you. ”

If the child is taken by the mother-in-law, and after the child goes to college, works and gets married, it is rare to come back several times a year, and not to accompany the child to grow up well when he is a child, it will be a lifetime of regret and pain for your life. Because you will never have the opportunity to release your mother's love in front of your children again, there is only one opportunity, and you missed it yourself. So, it's better to bring it yourself, and when the child goes to kindergarten, you can find a job with relatively free time and not delay picking up and dropping off the child.

My mother-in-law has a bad temper.

We've had a few fights because of kids.

They have a bad temper and can't let them take care of their children, so bring them yourself.

It is a family responsibility and obligation for a mother-in-law to take care of a baby after marriage. In traditional Chinese culture, mothers-in-law are an important role in the family, and they usually help take care of their grandchildren, especially when the daughter-in-law needs help. However, with the changes in society and the diversification of family structures, the responsibilities and obligations of mothers-in-law with babies are also changing.

First of all, it is a family responsibility for a mother-in-law to take care of a baby. In traditional families, mothers-in-law usually help take care of their grandchildren, which is a family responsibility. In this Kaiyeong dong situation, the mother-in-law usually takes on more housework and childcare responsibilities to help the son and daughter-in-law lighten the burden.

This family responsibility is based on the traditional values of the family and the affectionate relationship between family members.

Secondly, it is also a family obligation for a mother-in-law to take care of a baby. In modern society, family structures and family values have changed a lot. Many families are dual-income families, and both parents need to work and do not have enough time to take care of their children.

However, it is not an absolute responsibility and obligation for a mother-in-law to take care of a baby. In modern society, the family structure and family values are diversified, and the responsibilities and obligations of mothers-in-law and children are also changing. Some families may not have a mother-in-law or the mother-in-law is reluctant to take care of the children, and parents need to take care of the children themselves or find other ways to care for the children.

In addition, some mothers-in-law may be older or in poor health and cannot take on the responsibilities and obligations of caring for their children, so parents need to look for other ways to take care of their children.

In short, it is a family responsibility and obligation for a mother-in-law to take care of a baby after marriage, but it is not an absolute responsibility and obligation. In modern society, with the diversification of family structures and family values, parents need to find the most suitable way to take care of their children according to their actual situation and needs. Whether it is a mother-in-law with a baby or something else, the most important thing is to ensure that the child is guaranteed.

The answer, from the analysis of the description, should be said to be mixed.

Asking your mother-in-law to help take care of the children will make you feel more at ease, I believe that she will definitely do her best, and she can also get a relative leisure time from the busyness of taking care of the children.

And most mothers-in-law will be more doting on their children, which will also affect the pampering personality of the children.