Why the CORE e4500 is more expensive than the P4

These belong to the category of hyper-threading technologies.

Core Dual-Core and Core 2 Dual-core are dual-core products.

Hyper-threading technology is an over-the-top to dual-core technology. It's just excessive, just like DDR2 is the excess of DDR-DDR3, and the excessive product only plays the role of refurbishing the manufacturer's equipment, as well as satisfying people, so that software and system designers can understand the principle first.

This will allow you to update to new products. Excessive products have no value. Just as DDR2 is actually inferior to DDR, DDR3 is certainly higher in performance.

A dual-core. A hyperthread. Of course, it's Core! P4 has been phased out.

As said upstairs. The process is more advanced than P4. Low calorific value. Low power consumption. Strong performance.

Hehe. The landlord will make up for the CPU knowledge!!

Isn't it a generational thing that can be compared???

P4 6x0 series The price cannot be reduced due to cost.

It's the last p4

Just like when P3 was replaced by P4 at the end of the period.

P3 can't be reduced in price, but is more expensive than P4.

The Core E4500 is dual-core.

core architecture.

High efficiency and low power consumption.

It's simply incomparable to P4!!

Because the production process of the Core P4 is more advanced, and the performance is better than the P4 after the launch time, so it is more expensive than the P4.

The Pentium 4 uses an ancient processor architecture, and although the frequency is high, it is a bit "high-frequency and low-energy". The core2 e4500 uses the latest architecture of inter, although the frequency is not very high, but the execution efficiency is several times stronger than that of the Pentium 4, therefore, core2 e4500 is definitely better than the pentium 4, even if there is p4, it may not be able to do the core2 e4500.

The Core 2 is better than the P4 like a musket against a broadsword. The Core 2 architecture is much more advanced than the P4, changing the dilemma of P4's high frequency and low energy. Again. The performance of the dual-core is more than 50% stronger than that of the single-core. So that's all!

Oh, my God. It's too much stronger. One day and one earth.

Many, much, much! The two architectures are completely different!

The generations are different, and the performance is naturally different

The e4500 is dual-core... How to compare.

Much stronger than both p4s.

Core 2 E4500 frequency, front-side bus 800MHz, L2 cache 2M, 65nm process production, is a Core 2 dual-core processor; Ben 4 631 main frequency, front-side bus 800MHz, L2 cache 2M, 65 nm process production, is Ben 4 single-core processor. Reason 1, the Core 2 E4500 has one more SSE3+ instruction set than the Ben 4 631 (the performance is stronger than the Ben 4 631), the reason 2 Core 2 E4500 is still a dual-core processor of the Core architecture (stronger than the single-core processor of the Netbrest architecture Ben 4 631), the power consumption and stability of the Core 2 E4500 are stronger than the Ben 4 631, and the performance of the Core 2 E4500 with the tested main frequency is about equivalent to the Ben 4 670 (main frequency, front-side bus 800MHz, L2 cache 2M), so the Intel Pentium4 631 has worse performance and higher power consumption than the Intel Core 2 Duo E4500, and the Ben 4 of the Netbrest architecture (high frequency, high energy and high power consumption) is cheaper than the processor of the Core architecture (low frequency, high energy and low power consumption).

Pentium4 631 is an old product, technologically backward, with a large calorific value (more than 100 watts). The E4500 is a Core dual-core, with a new architecture, low power consumption (around 65W), power saving, and a new instruction set, with more overclocking space than the 631.

Technically backward performance is not necessarily bad, don't you say?

Of course, you say that the performance of the 631 is good, but some projects are superior, and in most cases the 4500 is good.

Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 basic specifications.

Applicable Type: Desktop CPU

CPU kernel allendale

Encapsulation mode PLGA

Number of cores: Dual cores.

Operating power (W) 65W

Core voltage (v).

Craftsmanship (micron) micron.

Octave (times) 11

External frequency: 200MHz

CPU instruction set Instruction Sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SUP-SSE3, EM64T, XD-BIT (hardware antivirus).

CPU technology, hyper-threading technology is not supported.

Other Parameters Other Performance Support for Intel Dual-Core Technology, 64-bit Addressing Technology, and support for Vista OS, as well as support for Viiv Home Platform Technology.

Well, but today's motherboards generally support 32-bit, so the advantage of 64-bit is not obvious.

Comparison of the specifications of the E6300 and the E4500.

Processor No. Cache Clock Speed FSB E6300 2 MB L2 GHz 1066 MHz Virtualization technology is supported.

e4500 2 MB L2 GHz 800 MHz

Of course 6300,,The higher the number,The better.。。 However, the higher the price.

If you choose the cost performance, you still choose the E4500. It is more cost-effective. 。

On the 1st floor,,Both CPU caches are 2MB.。 How is it that 6300 is bigger than 4500.

e6300

The cache is larger. More often.

More expensive.

Of course, the Core 2 is good, and the core and performance and heat control are much better than the P4 630!

Value for money = performance **.

Personally, I think core2 6300 is good.

Hehe: It doesn't have to be compared.

Cost-effective is the P4 630, which was originally sold for 2000+ and now has 500 performance, which is undoubtedly the core2 More advanced architecture, true dual-core processor, lower energy consumption and faster response time.

But it's going to change big in 3 months.

Core 2, dual-core, cost-effective is also good.

If you ignore ** and only talk about performance, it is obvious that core 2 is good.

Hello landlord:

Which is better, Core 2 Duo E4500 or Core 2 Duo E4600?

Of course it's the latter.'''''

On the main frequency, L2 cache has the advantage of the latter.

In fact, there is no big difference between the two processors, and the same E4 series is just a little bit different

If you still don't understand, I'm willing to help you solve it.

Wish: health and happiness.

If the two ** are about the same, buy 4600, if the difference is too much, buy 4500, because 4500 Xiaochao will become 4600, what motherboard to buy, I recommend going to Zhongguancun to see, the moderators inside are professionals, and the advice they give may be more helpful to you.

Zhongguancun**:

E4500 is equipped with a 945 motherboard, which is already very high 945 only supports 65nm CPU Question: It turns out to be an integrated card, if you are matching a graphics card, what model should you match, the motherboard has a PCI-E16 socket....Answer: The 8600GT is already very high, remember to change the power supply.

In October 2007, it was officially fully listed.

The performance is average: The player who was down by e52pk.

The ground floor is completely correct.

But if you are a 945 motherboard and want to buy a second-hand upgrade, you can still consider it.