Is Xiang Yu conceited, and the most fundamental reason for Xiang Yu s failure is because he is too c

He has done a lot of things that are admired by people before! So he's also a hero.

Xiang Yu kept saying that the sky was going to kill him before he died, but in fact, we all know who died of him.

He was a little conceited, as the last suicide showed.

But conceit does not hide his heroic deeds either!!

No one is perfect, and Xiang Yu is inevitably a little conceited. But in Wujiang Pavilion Chang persuaded him to return to Jiangdong, when he was the king in Jiangdong, he did not go back, he thought that as a man, he raised troops from Huiji, and brought 8,000 soldiers to cross the river, but in the end, no one survived, he returned to Jiangdong alone, he had no face to see people, he thought that he was spineless, greedy for life and afraid of death, disregarding others, selfish, and laughing. So in the end, he refused to cross the Jiangdong even if he died.

It is precisely for this reason that Li Qingzhao said that he is a hero.

He is conceited. No one is perfect, and he's great.

Of course conceited, of course he is also a real big hero.

In fact, everyone's opinion is different.

We mostly look at everyone's subjective thoughts.

The same goes for the history books.

Of course, the heroes are very egotistical.

From the suicide, it can be seen that Xiang Yu is a little conceited.

If you are conceited, you can't be a hero?

Whether Xiang Yu was defeated in **, this question has been debated for thousands of years without an answer. Liu Bang summarized the strengths of Xiao He, Han Xin, and Zhang Liang, and said that Xiang Yu had a Fan Zeng but did not use it. Zhang Liang suggested that Liu Bang could defeat Xiang Yu by using Han Xin, Peng Yue, and Yingbu.

When Liu Bang and Han Xin met for the first time, they pointed out that Xiang Yu's kindness was usually very concerned about her subordinates, and she waited for her subordinates to make great contributions but was stingy with rewards. Fan Zeng also said that Xiang Yukeng killed 200,000 Qin troops, how many Qin people he offended. The great man *** pointed out that Xiang Yu failed in three ways:

1. Let Liu Bang go. 2. Dingdu Pengcheng. 3, the chasm is the boundary, Xiang Yu executed, but Liu Bang disagreed, attacked and finally defeated Xiang Yu.

once said: Xiang Wang is not a politician.

Xiang Yu killed himself, which was very tragic, and many people sympathized with Xiang Yu and summarized Xiang Yu's failure from all angles.

I think Xiang Yu's failure has a lot to do with the implementation of the sub-sealing system. In the early Western Zhou Dynasty, the political sub-feudal system was compatible with the land system of the slave system, but in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, the Jingtian system was destroyed, and Xiang Yu's simple sub-feudal system no longer met the needs of the development of the situation.

Xiang Yu defeated the main force of the Qin army after the Battle of Julu, and after entering Xianyang, he had become the leader of the anti-Qin military forces. Xiong Xin, the king of Chu Huai, actually became a puppet, Liu Bang, Chen Yu and others all obeyed Xiang Yu's leadership, and Han Xin was still a little-known soldier.

Guan Jian is that Xiang Yu did not implement the county system of the Qin Dynasty and strengthened the centralized leadership, but implemented the feudal system in the Western Zhou Dynasty. In the process of separation, due to a variety of reasons, Qi Di Tian Rong, Zhao Di and Peng Yue, who had more than 10,000 armed forces, rebelled. Liu Bang also took advantage of Xiang Yu's suppression of the Qidi rebellion to rebel.

In the end, Xiang Yu killed himself in the battle of Xiaxia, and Liu Bang won.

With Xiang Yu's outstanding military ability and high prestige in destroying Qin, if he can maintain a clear political mind, implement the correct political line, and balance the relationship between all aspects, it is very likely to establish a stable regime.

Although there are certain reasons for conceit, but not all of them are for this reason, mainly because of Xiang Yu's character, short-sighted, brutal and unkind, indiscriminately killing innocents, not getting the hearts of the people, and slightly superior in military affairs, but not as powerful as Liu Bei in politics, Xiang Yu is just a brave man, not good at strategy, and the rewards and punishments are unknown, which leads to the reason for failure.

Yes. Because Xiang Yu's personality is self-righteous and does not listen to persuasion at all, he is indeed very conceited.

Conceit was one of the reasons for Xiang Yu's failure. In addition to conceit, such as indecision, uneven rewards and punishments are the fundamental reasons for Xiang Yu's failure.

No, mainly because his character is destined to be a hero, not a king, because he doesn't know how to use people, and he is stubborn and self-serving.

Yes, it has a lot to do with the personality of the person, who is a particularly arrogant person in life and believes only in himself in life and does not trust others at all.

Of course not, he is not an arrogant person, and the reason why he failed was because he lacked a general who could stand alone, and he lacked a right-hand man.

No, he's too indecisive. There was a chance to kill Liu Bang before, but he was reluctant to kill him with affection and righteousness.

The Siege of Xia" Xiang Yu's character: both the love of the children of the overlord Farewell Concubine, and the brave and good battle of the siege of Dongcheng; There are not only the maze of the Yin Tomb, the inconspiracy and conceit of the defeat to the sky, but also the shame and righteousness, simplicity and benevolence of the Wujiang River refusal to cross, the gift of the horse pavilion chief, and the head of the deceased.

The author is also good at artistic processing of historical facts, and has written many vivid and expressive details, such as the tragic song of Yu Xi Yu Xi through the ages, the life and death opportunity of "Tian Father Xuan", the shameful conscience of his father, and the deathbed act of giving horses and heads, etc., so that this text has reached the aesthetic realm of majestic and tragic, and it is heartwarming to read.