The elderly in rural areas often say that adding people does not add dogs , so why can t they add d

This sentence means: if there is a new person in the family, the family can no longer have a dog after having a child, and the dog must be given away, otherwise it will be unlucky for the whole family. In fact, this sentence has no scientific basis, and it is just a concept in the old era and backward areas.

Because dogs have a lot of bacteria on their bodies, especially in rural areas, they are likely to eat rats or feces, so it is easy to infect people.

Because it is enough for a family to have a dog, the rural economy is generally low, and raising too much will increase the burden on the family.

It's all, and I make excuses because I can't afford to be poor.

At this point, Shannong also knows why there is a saying "adding people but not dogs".

1. According to feudal superstition, dogs have spirituality and can see filthy things, and fierce black dogs can ward off evil spirits. If you want to add a population to your family, you can't add a dog, you can only have the same person and a dog. In the past, everyone believed that the birth of a child was a new reincarnation of ghosts and gods.

If you have a dog in the house, you are likely to collide with the ghosts, so that the ghosts will not come to their house. This would add to the hopelessness of the game. This idea is deeply ingrained in the hearts of the older generation, but in an increasingly scientific society, this statement rarely appears.

2. Afraid of disturbing pregnant women, dogs like to pounce and lick people, there are pregnant women at home, in case the dog is too excited, resulting in pregnant women.

What to do if you fall. Or the barking of a dog, which frightens a pregnant woman, is also a terrible thing. After a woman becomes pregnant, her physical and mental ability will be weakened, and it is easy to cause poor mood due to external factors.

3. Bacteria and parasites hidden in the dog's body, such as toxoplasma gondii. When a pregnant woman lives under the same roof as her dog, she may become infected even if she does not have direct contact with the dog. It leads to a decrease in the resistance of pregnant women, fetal malformations, etc.

There are bacteria, parasites and incubation periods in dogs, and doctors generally recommend that families who are preparing for pregnancy stay away from cats and dogs and other animals half a year in advance.

In the past, dogs were the most common in rural areas, and people used to raise dogs to take care of their homes, but now they are more likely to be raised as pets to relieve boredom. There are many sayings about dogs in the countryside, such as "add people without adding dogs, add dogs to death", what does this saying mean? Why can't you add a dog when you add someone?

Why did Tim Dog die?

In rural areas, people like to use "Tian" to indicate that there is a new life in the family, and who has a newborn in our family, neighbors and relatives will ask "whether is there a boy or a girl" after they know it. Therefore, as the saying goes, "add people without adding dogs, add dogs to death" means that if there is a small life to be born in the family, do not have another dog in this time period, if you have to insist on adding two new lives to the family in the same time period, then there will definitely be a life that will be threatened.

I believe that many young people will not understand after seeing this saying, now many young people only need a child after marriage, and they will feel that the child is very lonely in the growth of the child, so they will raise a dog or a cat to accompany the child to grow upTherefore, many people think that it is normal to have two new lives at the same time in the family. In the past, there was not enough food, so I would say so

In addition to starving the dog to death, there is another important reason why people don't like to have a dog when adding a person, that is, they are afraid that the bacteria on the dog will be transmitted to the newborn。In the past, rural dogs almost did not vaccinate dogs, and there was no condition to vaccinate dogs in the countryside before, and local dogs lived in the mounds in the countryside all year round, and it was inevitable that there would be bacteria after a long time, and the bacteria of the big dogs would be transmitted to the puppy, if there were pregnant women or children in the family, their own resistance was very low, and it was easy to be infected by the bacteria on the dogIn the past, the level of medical care in rural areas was very low, and it was very likely that dogs would die if they were infected with bacteria, so people did not like to hold dogs at home after pregnant women or newborns were at home.

Although the medical level and living standards in rural areas are gradually improving, and people will also vaccinate dogs when they raise dogs, it is still necessary to pay more attention to physical health for pregnant women, newborns and the elderly who have weak body resistance. Although the saying "add people but not dogs" is a bit exaggerated, there is some truth to it.

In the past, dogs were the most common in rural areas, and people used to raise dogs to take care of their homes, but now they are more likely to be raised as pets to relieve boredom. In our side, there is a saying that "dogs come to get rich", so in the countryside it is really important for many family dogs, but why is there "".There are not enough people".What about the saying? What does this rural proverb mean? Does any truth make sense?

In fact, there is a second half of this saying, but few people know it, so let's listen to how the old farmer explained it to us!

First of all, the second half of this proverb is even more scary, and the original circulating saying is"Tim people do not add dogs, add dogs do not have a mouthful" This sentence means that after the family has a child, a person has been added, and you can no longer raise a dog, if you raise a dog and eat more, it will lead to insufficient food at home, one less bite per capita, so there is a saying that "add people without adding dogs", which has been handed down, the main reason is because the family is poor, and the dog is afraid of wasting food. However, there are also more superstitious explanations, that is, the old people in the past believed that dogs had spirituality and could see filthy things, and that fierce black dogs could ward off evil spirits, and that if there was a dog at home, it was likely to collide with ghosts and gods, resulting in no ghosts and gods coming to their homes. This would add to the hopelessness of the game.

Another theory is that cats and dogs have parasites and infectious diseases, which is also more scientific, but these parasites are still not able to be used in the past; Moreover, dog hair is everywhere, which is not good for people who are preparing to get pregnant and pregnant women, and there is also a danger of harm to the child itself, so people don't like to hold a dog at home after having a pregnant woman or a newborn. This is a good explanation of why there is a saying that "adding people does not add dogs, adding dogs to death".

Although, now a lot of dogs areGet vaccinated and bathe oftenThere are almost no parasitic bacteriaIt should be very safe, but for rural areas where the sanitary conditions are not good, we still try not to let pregnant women come into contact with cats, dogs, and small animals, especially stray dogs.

So from these two points of view, it is better for families who have just had children not to have dogs, rather than the so-called "."Add people without adding dogs, add dogs without a bite or die a mouthful" saying. To sum up, whether it is superstitious or not, it is not wrong to believe in the elderly, if there are pregnant women at home, for the health of pregnant women and infants, it is better not to have a dog! If you want to raise a dog, you can wait for the child to grow up, and it's not too late to raise it!

What does the rural saying "add people but not dogs" mean?

Because they feel that having a dog at home is enough, and more is a waste of resources, while people are different.

It's a kind of ignorant feudal saying in the past, which roughly means that if you have a dog, then it's difficult to add people, and the meaning of adding people means that there are children for example, and you don't have to believe in these at all.

That is to say, don't just keep someone else's dog, there may be some bad situations.

The main reason is that the family is poor, and raising dogs is afraid of wasting food.

For dogs, people must be more important, after all, dogs are just animals.

This should be another colloquialism, but I really don't understand the specific meaning.

I think this should be some feudal saying, and it doesn't have any actual meaning.

It's boring, don't dwell on this kind of problem, just listen to it.

Because they have made different decisions under different circumstances.

When our neighbors find out who has a newborn baby, they will ask "is there a boy or a girl?" Therefore, as the saying goes, "Add people but not dogs."

In the past, the old people believed that dogs had spirituality and could see filth, and that fierce black dogs could ward off evil spirits, and that if they had a dog at home, they were likely to collide with ghosts and gods, resulting in no ghosts coming to their homes. This would add to the hopelessness of the game.

The level and living standards are gradually improving, and people will also vaccinate dogs when they have dogs, but for pregnant women with weak body resistance

The meaning of this sentence is that if you want to add a newborn to your home, you should not have a dog, because if you have a dog, someone will die in the family.

I don't think it's interesting, maybe the older generation said it when they were scolding.

I don't think it's justified at all, and it's an absurd claim that can't be trusted.

This should not be a professional statement, that is, feudal superstition has no scientific basis.

That's because don't add people like dogs, or it will be very troublesome.

If you have added a person, you can't have another dog, and if you have a dog and eat too much, it will lead to not enough food at home.

Adding people without adding dogs means that if you have children at home, you will no longer have dogs, because pets will have a certain impact on the health of children.

I think it's as if it's enough to have a dog, which is already the biggest restriction for rural areas, and adding people can add more labor.

The person who said these things felt that having a dog was not as good as raising a man, and that it could increase the labor force.

This is that people can help with the work, which is equivalent to a labor force, and dogs can't.

Because I feel that if there is one more person, everyone can share a little bit and reduce the burden.

This is because it is just a colloquial saying of famous people, so they say this kind of thing.

Because adding another dog will be more burdensome, and basically can't afford to raise it.

This should be a common saying, that is, don't do superfluous things.