AMD3200 Similar to the performance of the P4 with a more or less frequency

According to AMD's nominal frequency, it should be similar to P4 performance, but in actual application, I feel that the performance is similar to P4, and it is not absolutely the same, in processing compression, and image processing and other applications that P4 is good at and P4 There is still a gap, but in game applications, it is even better than P4 performance! 3200+ still has a certain amount of overclocking space, A64's CPU heat is very low, if your motherboard is good enough, it can still be overclocked, my computer has been overclocked, very stable! In addition, I feel that the U performance of the A64 3200+ 939 needle is already good, as for the U of about 1000, I heard that the intel buckle meat is good, but I didn't see it and didn't comment, because intel is often thunderous and rainy, and I'm already very disappointed with it.

3200+CPU overclocking of this grade will not improve any performance, if it is a game, or AMD's is cooler, ** cheaper, the performance of the computer is the entire configuration of the match, the CPU cannot support all.

Now AMD Athlon 3500 is only 950 yuan. It's worth considering.

Personally, I think that if you have money, of course, you can buy Intel, and after the dual channel, AMD really can't compare. It's just that Intel is more expensive, and it's expensive in places like motherboards. It costs a lot of money to buy Intel motherboards.

AMD, on the other hand, is much easier to match, and I think the money is the main difference, and there will be no difference in performance.

I'm here too!

First of all, the AMD Sempron 2600+ actual main frequency is only about that! If you want to compare it with P4 from the main frequency! There is no way to compare! The P4 of the 478 interface is also going to be on the frequency of 2G! I'm talking about the performance of this CPU, honestly, 2600

That is, the main frequency is more than 2500+, and some places are even worse than 2500+, for example, the main frequency of 2500+ is, the first-level cache is 128k, the second-level cache is 512k, the 2600+ main frequency is, the first-level cache is 128k, but the second-level cache is only 256k, which is half less than 2500+! That is to say, 2600+ may be a little faster, and the others are the same as 2500+, or even worse than 2500+ in terms of memory read! Personally, I recommend that you use 2500+ or 2800+, as both of these wide L2 caches are 512k

Let's talk about the elite motherboard! In the future, you remember,K8The motherboards of the models at the beginning are all on the AMDCPU,It's impossible to get Intel's CPU,Because the interface is different,And the K8T800 motherboard uses Wasion chips,The compatibility is relatively poor,If you want to go to AMD's CPU, it is recommended that you find a main shed of NF chips,For example, NF3

NF4 compatibility is good!

Processor name: i3-370m, cache capacity: 3 MB, clock speed: GHz, TPD, power consumption: 35 W, DDR3, speed: DDR3-800, 1066 MHz, integrated graphics, Yes, number of cores: 2

This CPU performance is absolutely satisfactory for daily use, and it is not worse than the previous generation P8700. The main frequency is the same as that of the i5-450M.

P340 is AMD's latest generation of notebook dedicated CPU, the main frequency is the same level as Intel Pentium dual-core, but the power consumption is much lower than that of Pentium, and the bus bandwidth reaches, much higher than that of Pentium processors, plus affordable**, P340 has a better cost performance.

The price-performance ratio is of course that the P340 is higher.

The power consumption of the former is 25W, and the latter is 35W

The front-side bus of the former reaches while the latter only. The advantages are obvious.

As a general gamer or office, the former is naturally chosen,Note**,Half of the P340 machine is between 4100---4500,The latter is between 4300---4700,With a separate display。

The i3 has one more hyper-threading feature than the former, which is a physical dual-core, but there are four threads, so it shows that the processor core is four cores (two are virtual).

All things considered, unless you're very biased towards Intel's processors, go for the former.