Regarding the question of AMD and Pentium, what is the difference between AMD s processor and Pentiu

Choose Pentium, the comprehensive performance is much stronger, AMD is very cool to play games, but Pentium is not inferior to it, you can't tell the difference between 60 Zhen and 80 Zhen at all. It's wise to choose Intel now, and it's easy to upgrade.

I think AMD is more suitable to play games, and AMD's ** is cheaper than Pentium's, but more people use Pentium, so sometimes they think that Pentium's CPU will be better than AMD's, but it's not much worse

It depends on your budget, if your budget is sufficient, I recommend you to choose Intel, if the budget is not very large, I recommend you to choose AMD, it is better cost performance. Intel's is relatively stable, but for those who like DIY, I recommend AMD.

Since you can't tell the difference between 60 and 80.

So why is there any"AMD is very cool to play games"?

It's inconsistent.

AMD is indeed much stronger in games. Especially if it is less than 1,000 people. Saiyang is completely incomparable to Shining Dragon in terms of gameplay.

Stable AMD is not much worse. Instability is mostly a software issue. CPU-induced instability is now far too rare.

My dream is a CPU like the AMD Athlon™ X2 3800+

No, in 2007 AMD will launch new processors that support DDR2 as well.

Socket AM2 motherboard, now it is more suitable to buy Inter CPU.

If you want it now, we recommend using an Intel Pentium D 805 or 820 dual-core processor.

Don't go too far, why don't you say that Intel will release a new architecture of the meat processor this fall?

AMD processors also have high, medium and low ends, but at the moment it seems that AMD processors are really good for gaming.

Of course, the stability of the Intel platform is also incomparable to the AMD platform.

I only know that when I went to buy a computer, people told me that AMD seems to be as fast as the Pentium 4, but it seems to be more prone to problems, but the AMD used by my classmates said that it was not bad.

AMD is the name of the processor manufacturer, and another even better manufacturer is Intel.

Pentium is a type of Intel processor.

Both manufacturers do x86 processors.

AMD's processor is cheap and the performance is acceptable. Intel processor, expensive, good performance.

Intel processors are better in terms of audio and video, AMD is a game, and the price of AMD for the same performance is also lower, and it has a built-in memory controller, so it comes with a dual-channel function, unlike Intel with a northbridge to control, and AMD's multi-core processor is better than Intel.

Because AMD has only one architecture R&D team, and Intel has more than one, when the Pentium 4-M (mobile version P4) was beaten by low-temperature and high-efficiency Quanmeida in the notebook field, its other team quickly improved the Pentium three architecture to create a Centrino, when it was completely unable to compete with Athlon and dual-core Athlon in the desktop field. Its other R&D team quickly made some improvements to the third-generation Centrino used in laptops at the time, the Core 1, except for the desktop version of the Core 2.

If you look at the Hokage, the current situation is that AMD is just Uchiha Itachi, although he is strong but there is only one person, and Intel is almost equivalent to the six paths of Payne, when one Payne is defeated, there are still the remaining Payne and the main body Nagato can continue to fight, almost undefeated. When AMD can evolve to the level of Vortex Naruto and turn on the immortal mode, he may be able to have a good fight with Intel, Payne.

As for why AMD now loses when the number of cores and caches are not weak, there are three reasons, the first is that AMD did not develop a four-launch processor until the bulldozer era, and Intel's core generation (notebook Centrino 3) is already a four-launch processor, which directly determines that the core efficiency of the processor A is not as good as I; The second is the cache speed, the first-level cache speed of the AMD processor is OK, but the second-level cache is only big and not fast, and the cache speed of the last few levels of the AIDA64 test is completely lost to Intel, which is affected by the memory performance that AMD K8 has been proud of in the previous era is now not as good as Intel (because the data is read from the processor's cache to memory); The third is instruction set optimization,Bulldozer has a lot of new instruction sets,But unfortunately Intel's influence is too great, few software companies openly support AMD,There is a transcoding program over there in the graphics card bar that is written specifically for the instruction set of bulldozers,At that transcoding speed, all Intel's i7 i5 i3 processors can't compete with bulldozers at all,It's a pity that it's too little。 AMD was a very good 3DNOW! and 3dnow!

The instruction set has also been rarely adopted by software companies and has now had to be abandoned by AMD. It's an unfair match, but there's no way around it.

Intel processors are mainly stable in terms of comprehensive performance and high frequency. AMD positioning is cost-effective and usable, and Intel positioning is high-end, superior performance and stability. When playing big games, AMD processors are not able to do anything, and Intel processors are stress-free, so that's the big difference between the two.