Canon ixus980, Canon ixus870, Samsung NV9, compare.

If you want to learn photography with a card machine, then buy the Nikon S710 with full manual function, wide angle, 1400W pixels.

If you're just having fun, if you want to be fashionable, buy Sony T700, ultra-small, ultra-thin and super fashionable! The picture quality is definitely up to the level of home!

If you want image quality (a 1000 quick camera will suffice to meet your home needs), you can buy the Panasonic LX3 or the Canon G10 (more than 3000, not a card player).

If you want to neutralize the Canon Ixus 80is in terms of image quality and fashion, the only drawback is that there is no wide angle, 800W pixels, and 400W pixels for home cameras are enough!

In addition, Canon's Powershot E1 is also relatively good-looking, which is very suitable for girls!

Also, the Canon Ixus 870 is a lot better than the Ixus 980!

Samsung doesn't need to think about it, a mediocre brand, there are no outstanding advantages!

I bought 870. It feels okay. There are a lot of features, and the wide angle allows you to shoot a larger background at a relatively close distance, which is very useful for taking photos when you are out and about.

As for pixels, if the image quality is passed, there are 5 million to have a better impression, 14.7 million seems to have no practical significance, who always shoots what big **?

10 million of 870 is also enough.

The three cameras have the best image quality, and the CCD max also has the advantages of manually adjusting the shutter speed and aperture (maybe you don't need this function now, not necessarily in the future.) ）

Although 870 has a wide angle, but CCD is only an ordinary size, which means that the picture quality is worse than 980, and this is true in actual comparison, especially in low light, 980's noise reduction effect is stronger, and the image quality is better, and the wide-angle picture will have slight distortion and distortion in close photos, and it is still so good to photograph the landscape.

870 is good, with a wide angle. 980 ** is a lot more expensive, which is also the pixel high. The other features are pretty much the same. The cost performance is still 870 good.

Actually, you don't have to buy **.

The 980 and 870 are machines that have just been on the market for a short time.

**The moisture is relatively large, and besides, I'm sure you won't like it either.

What do they look like?

You can think about 80 It's simple, but it's colorful.

I just want to buy a nice machine to take pictures, and the ixus80 is around 1500 now. Cheap and practical.

For you. /

I recommend the one with a 28mm wide-angle lens, which allows you to shoot wider scenes.

ixus870is。

The 870 is ahead of the 980 parameters:

The size of the LCD screen is inches, which is greater than 980 inches. When viewing**, the large screen of 870 will be more refreshing;

The 28mm wide-angle lens packs a wider picture than the 980's 36mm lens at the same distance. This function is the most practical - for example, when taking a group photo indoors, the 870 can put all the people into the camera, and the 980 has the worry that it can't put all the people into the camera because it is too close. When shooting landscape photos, the 870's wide-angle lens captures a wide scene that is even more striking than the 980's small wide-angle shot.

The 980 is ahead of the 870 in parameters:

The pixel boost is 14.7 million pixels, which is larger than the 870's 10 million pixels;

The sensor size is 1 inch, which is also 1 inch larger than the 870.

For home users, 10 million pixels are basically useless. So the 14.7 million pixels of the 980 have no practical meaning for non-professional users;

Let's take a look at the relationship between pixels and size:

3R, 4R**3 million is enough;

Printing A4 format ** will cost about 5 million;

Printing or spray-painting A3 or more (with the size of a wall calendar)**, 8 million pixels is enough.

The 980's 1-inch sensor size is certainly larger than the 870's 1-inch sensor.

The large size of the sensor theoretically improves the sharpness of **, but because it has to accommodate 1470 pixels at the same time, the advantages of a large-area sensor are offset by the increased pixel load. Therefore, under the same pixel conditions, its ** clarity will not be higher than that of 870.

Both models use the same type of battery, both of which are dedicated to rechargeable lithium batteries, NB-5L. The large screen of the 870 consumes more power, and the 980

Large-sized sensors also consume more power, so the battery life of the two devices should be about the same.

In terms of appearance, it is a matter of opinion. I think the curvy shape of the 980 is a bit feminine, or the traditional shape of the 870 is more beautiful and more characteristic of the Canon "Ixus" series.

The ** of 980 is nearly 300 yuan higher than that of 870.

So, on the whole, I think ixus

is more cost-effective.

Personal advice and opinions for your reference:

On the Canon IXUS IS model, the CCD size of the photoreceptor chip is the same as that of 1 inch, and there is no major difference in the actual imaging effect, which is basically the same type and grade model.

The Canon Ixus is a card player with a telescopic lens, which has slightly better imaging results than a card player with a periscope lens.

The Canon Ixus IS is a fully automatic camera, for a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, can not be manually adjusted by apiris, shutter and other parameters to obtain accurate **, can only be through the camera pre-set various shooting modes to cope with a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, in poor light conditions, especially in shooting night scenes will appear to be inadequate, but the average home is completely competent.

In terms of overall performance and practicality, the Canon IXUS 870is is slightly higher than the Canon IXUS 970IS, mainly with a wide angle of 28mm.

Buying a camera is the same as buying a computer, and the one that suits you is the best.

You can compare each model according to your own price and favorite, check the information on the Internet.