Discuss the nature of science from the perspective of science

Taoism and science are two completely different cultural systems. Just as the sun and the moon walk together in the sky, each has its own merit.

Nowadays, many people are fond of science, regard our Chinese Taoism as outdated, and even say that it is the work of a god, and even label pseudoscience on the traditional Chinese monastic culture.

In fact, my traditional Chinese culture is not scientific. Why do you have to use a scientific perspective to slander traditional Chinese culture!

Scientists, like the leaves of a multitude tree, are fragmented and clinging to one of them. Taoism is like the fundamental, invisible and the system is magnificent. Nothing contains everything, it can be used to interpret all things, it can be transformed into ten thousand laws, and it can be used for all purposes.

Science can perceive things with the five senses, while Taoism seeks to be based on them. The source has all of it, beyond the scope of the five senses, so it jumps out of the three realms and five elements.

Science is smooth. One and ten, ten and hundred, more and more complicated, endless, I don't know the end. The Tao is reversed, returning to the source, knowing one and everything is done, and the original is self-evident.

However, the Tao begets all things invisible. It is difficult for the world to understand, and it is attributed to the mystery.

From a scientific point of view, man is self-man, heaven is self-being, and the three talents are incoherent, and the law of heaven and man is one, and the law of man and earth is intertwined. In my opinion, this is the biggest difference between science and Taoism.

In short, science is doing something, while Taoism is doing nothing.

Let's talk about the history of science.

The science you are talking about is no more than 300 years old from now, which is relatively short.

From the entire history of human civilization to the next year, the history of human development is nearly 5,000 years, and science is only 300 years, which is too short.

1. Practice refers to the object activity of human beings to actively transform the objective world. The essence of practice determines that practice has a fundamental and fundamental position in human life, and practice constitutes the basic way of human existence.

2. The basic characteristics of practice: objective reality; Conscious agency.

Social History. 3. The basic forms of practice: production practice, social relationship practice, spiritual and cultural creation practice.

4. The relationship between the world of freedom and the world of human beings and their practical activities Both have objective reality.

The difference between the two is that the free world is the natural world that is independent of human activities or has not yet been included in the scope of human activities, and its movement changes are completely spontaneous and in blind interaction. The human world is inseparable from the activities of the people, and practice is the basis for the differentiation and unity of the free world and the human world.

The connotation of the scope of practice can be summarized as the perceptual object activity of human consciousness and self-determination, that is, the process of objectifying the essential power of human beings and discarding the objectification.

Practice is the only criterion for testing whether it is the truth, and the test is the truth, and the word truth already contains the correct meaning, and the word practice already contains the meaning of science or tends to be scientific.

So this sentence is inevitable.

Zhang Li's correctness stems from the scientific error of practice.

In 1845, Marx raised the question of the criterion for testing truth: "Whether or not human thinking has objective truth is not a question of theory, but a question of practice. People should prove the truth of their own thinking in practice, that is, the reality and power of their own thinking, that is, the nature of their own thinking.

The debate about the reality of thinking detached from practice is a matter of pure scholasticism. ”

He said: "There is only one truth, and whoever discovers the truth does not rely on subjective exaggeration, but on objective practice." Only the revolutionary practice of millions of people is the yardstick for testing the truth. ”

Practice is the objective material activity of human beings to actively transform the world. (This is the essence of practice).

Human beings can understand and transform the world through their own practical activities. (This is the role of practice).

Specifically, practice is the basis of understanding, and its decisive role in understanding is mainly manifested in the following four aspects: 1. Practice produces the need for understanding. (Because if people want to transform the world, they must first understand the world) 2. Practice provides the possibility of understanding.

3. Practice enables the generation and development of understanding. 4. Practice is the only criterion for testing the truth of understanding. Practice is all the actions of the conscious self of human beings.

The contradiction between the inner consciousness ontology and the life ontology is the fundamental contradiction that promotes the self-emancipation of human beings, and its externalization is the liberation of nature, inter-individual, collective relations and class relations formed by the whole of human individuals, organizations and classes through production relations. Practice is only human and personal under conscious consciousness, that is, the so-called: practice produces true knowledge.

Practice is the activity of people to transform the objective world, practice has direct reality, human consciousness can not change objective things, human consciousness can only change objective things by knowing practice.

Answer C This is a cause and effect question, the stem is the effect, and the option is the cause. Scientific theories can guide practice, and we should look for them from their essential attributes, that is, they correctly reveal the law of the development of things, and doing things according to the law cannot be separated from the guidance of scientific theories. Item C correctly states the essential attributes of scientific theories and their functions, and is the correct option.