How did ancient people withdraw from marriage, and if one party did not agree, did they have to go t

It seems that the man writes a letter of resignation and finishes the woman.

Verbal engagement is not binding, and in ancient times, there would be a letter of appointment for a little upper-class point. If both parties agree to the divorce, one party cannot terminate it, but in this case, the winner is the powerful party.

Generally, the man does not need to compensate for the divorce, and the woman has to compensate the man for the divorce, because the ancient man was inferior to the woman. The woman has power, and there may be a lawsuit.

In ancient times, the idea of male superiority and inferiority of women was serious, and generally there was only one word of divorce, and the man drafted a letter of divorce, and the wife could be divorced after being determined by a third party.

In general, you can't directly say that you will withdraw from the marriage, because it will damage the reputation of the other party, and if you really want to leave, you should ask someone to say it, and you can't be too straightforward to hurt your feelings. If it really doesn't make sense, you have to go to the yamen to hand over the form.

In ancient times, marriage paid attention to the words of the parents and the matchmaker, that is, the marriage was determined by the parents and the matchmaker, and there was no autonomy. Of course, the divorce also needs to be negotiated by the parents and the matchmaker. Generally speaking, there is a marriage letter at the beginning of the engagement, which is written by the matchmaker, and after it is written, it is written in duplicate, and one copy for each of the two families after pressing the handprint, which is properly kept.

If you want to withdraw from the marriage, you need to be present with at least one of the parents of both parties, and the matchmaker is also present, and the three parties discuss, if the divorce agreement is reached, then the matchmaker needs to write a marriage letter to dissolve the marriage contract, and one copy for each of the two families by pressing the handprint. Then you can destroy the original marriage certificate.

No. Because the ancients attached great importance to "faith", "a gentleman's word, the horse is difficult to chase", so there will be an example of finger belly marriage.

Who told you that you can't get married if you are engaged, but both parties must agree to the engagement and divorce, and if one party does not agree, you can go to the yamen to file a lawsuit.

In ancient times, if you are engaged, you will also get married. It is nothing more than the return of the bride price by the woman! This kind of verbal statement is generally valid! Verbally called for marriage! But there are also a lot of regrets!

He thinks that you have acquiesced to being his girlfriend, and you are saying that you are late, and what he hears means that everyone is okay when they see you together, and your relationship is public.

Registered, not registered, there is nothing between you.

Did you receive any gift money? If you accept it, at least you have to return the gift money to him, or if you don't, I'm afraid it will be very troublesome.

No, the law won't, but the human favor will.

It should still be money, although nominally nominally no, but how can there be such a good thing in the world? In ancient times, the supervision ability should be very poor, most of the people can't afford to read, and the yamen will not accept the pleading, find someone to write the pleadings for money, even if you can write, because the supervision ability at that time was poor, and most of the people were greedy whenever they were officials! This is the same regardless of whether the politics are clear or not!

Because there were no monitoring conditions at that time, you still want to win if you don't have money? It's just asking for trouble! Not everyone can meet Bao Qingtian, Bao Zheng has been a person for so long, who knows if he has been packaged as a historical idol!

Anyway, civil and commercial lawsuits in Western countries cost money, and the current legal theory of our country is mainly based on the European civil law system, and has little to do with the ancient Chinese legal system.

Don't talk nonsense in Lanzhou, in ancient times, lawsuits not only cost money, but if it was a min lawsuit, you had to suffer 50 boards before entering the yamen. Just look for a book like "Unspoken Rules".

In ancient times, lawsuits not only required money, but also drummers

If you want money, ask the master for money, most of the ancients can't write, ask someone to write a pleading, ask for money.

The ideology is different. Now it is capitalism, objective fairness is justice, and it provides you with a platform, and of course the cost is paid by yourself. In the past, it was benevolence and morality, and benevolence and righteousness were justice.

Of course, you can't take money when you talk about benevolence and righteousness. One is the rule of law, where the law of the jungle is the strong. One is the rule of man, the rule of man depends on man, and it is unstable.

Yes, the so-called deposit, that is, the bride price, Article 10 of the Judicial Interpretation II of the Marriage Law: Where a party requests the return of the bride price paid in accordance with custom, the people's court shall support it if it is ascertained to fall under the following circumstances:

1) The parties have not gone through the marriage registration formalities;

2) The parties have gone through marriage registration formalities but do not live together;

3) Payments made before marriage that cause hardship to the payor.

The application of the provisions of items (2) and (3) of the preceding paragraph shall be conditional on the divorce of both parties.

If the following conditions are met, the bride price can be returned.

Article 10 of Interpretation II of the Marriage Law: Where a party requests the return of the bride price paid in accordance with custom, the people's court shall support it if it is ascertained that it falls under the following circumstances:

1) The parties have not gone through the marriage registration formalities;

2) The parties have gone through marriage registration formalities but do not live together;

3) Payments made before marriage that cause hardship to the payor.

The application of the provisions of items (2) and (3) of the preceding paragraph shall be conditional on the divorce of both parties.

If the marriage fails, the bride price must be returned.

Of course, you run, don't care so much, it's impossible to gamble with a lifetime of happiness......

Of course, the bride price will be returned to others, and you are not **, why don't you want to return it to others?

If you don't want to get married, why do you still accept a bride price?

In the yamen, there is a **-official tone.