What is the Achilles heel of capitalism today?

** The ability to regulate free capital markets is too weak.

Once there is a crisis in the free capital market.

**If you do not intervene, it will lead to chaos or even collapse of the market order; However, if too much intervention in the market is contrary to the concept of free capital markets.

For example, the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States.

In its most literal sense, capitalism is to rely on the bourgeois assets to run the state apparatus...

This is its most fatal weakness.

And the development trend of capitalism will inevitably be socialism.

Her main contradiction is the contradiction between socialized mass production and private appropriation, which he cannot solve on his own, so he will eventually move towards socialism.

Welfare is too good like a country that exploits its people

The historical inevitability of socialism replacing capitalism is the core of Marx and Engels' theory of socialism, and it is also the basic principle of scientific socialism. The historical inevitability of socialism replacing capitalism includes the important principles of "two inevitability" and "two nevers."

"Two inevitability" refers to the conclusion that "the destruction of the bourgeoisie and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable" that Marx and Engels came to after rigorous argumentation in the Communist Manifesto.

In 1859, in the preface to the Critique of Political Economy, Marx expounded another important principle of historical materialism: "No social form will perish until all the productive forces it can contain are brought into play; And the new and higher relations of production will never appear until the material conditions of its existence have matured in the twin of the old society" (abbreviated as "two never") This is another overall exposition made by Marx on the law of the development of human society from the degree of historical materialism Takahashi Kiri.

The "two inevitability" reveals the general historical trend of socialism replacing capitalism. What the "two nevers" reveal is the long-term and tortuous nature of socialism replacing capitalism. The "two inevitability" and "two nevers" jointly demonstrate the historical inevitability of socialism replacing capitalism, and together constitute the nuclear sensitivity of the theory of scientific socialism.

The basic contradictions of capitalism have deepened and intensified with the development of capitalism, and the forms of movement in reality are complex, sometimes intensifying, sometimes easing, and staggered with ups and downs. The role of various factors in the movement, such as the scientific and technological revolution, the adjustment of the form of capital ownership, the change of policies, and the maturity of the revolution, all make the movement of basic contradictions complex and tortuous, thus making the replacement of capitalism by socialism a complex and tortuous historical process and of a long-term nature.

The Inevitability and Long-Term Character of Socialism Replacing Capitalism Capitalism will inevitably be replaced by socialism, and its development has prepared the necessary conditions for the transformation to social reincarnation.

The culture of Europe and the United States is more inclined to plunder and competition, because the resources are limited, and plunder and competition will inevitably not last. Oriental culture, or infiltrating Chinese culture, is biased towards mutual tolerance and regeneration, so even if it has experienced the rise and fall, it can continue to continue.

Capitalist private ownership of the means of production is the Achilles' heel of capitalism.

In capitalist countries, the means of production are privately owned, and companies and enterprises are privately owned. If a business invents a new technology, then he will certainly not immediately make it public in the whole industry, because the enterprise is privately owned, the owner of the business wants to make money, and new technologies can bring him new wealth. In this way, at least for a considerable period of time, the new technology is only in the hands of the company, which means that this is the only company that can improve the new technology.

And because the new technology is only in the hands of the enterprise, the business owner will use the technology to obtain higher benefits, and this benefit is ultimately obtained from the broad masses of people.

In contrast, the public ownership of the means of production under the socialist system is much superior. In socialist countries, the means of production are publicly owned, and if a company invents a new technology, it is immediately disclosed throughout the industry. Because the enterprise is publicly owned, the disclosure of new technology will not affect the interests of the enterprise manager, on the contrary, if some policies are adopted to give appropriate interest rewards to the enterprise manager who invents the new technology, the enterprise can also increase the intensity of the enterprise's promotion of the new technology.

In this way, new technologies can be immediately disseminated and the population at large can immediately benefit from them. At the same time, since all enterprises in the whole industry have mastered this new technology, the forces involved in the improvement of this new technology far exceed those of enterprises under the capitalist system, so that production can be developed faster than under the capitalist system. History, on the other hand, is the choice of relations of production that are more conducive to the development of production, so socialism will inevitably replace capitalism.

The Achilles' heel of capitalism is that it is too realistic to tell people how to work, how to live, and how to make profits, unlike socialism, which can immerse people in an incomparable sense of superiority in beautiful language.

Democracy, tolerance, and free competition. Socialist parties can also come to power in capitalist countries, such as France, through elections.

It is impossible to resolve the contradiction that preceded socialized mass production and private ownership of the means of production.

The contradiction between private ownership of the means of production and socialized mass production is the Achilles heel of capitalism.

The Achilles' heel of capitalism is private ownership of the means of production, which is also its strength.

Laughter makes sense for Qingshan Wanzhongtian. But what is the impetus to invent new technologies?