What is the difference between bureaucratic capitalism and national capitalism

Updated on educate 2024-03-21
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    First, the subject is different.

    Imperialism refers to foreign aggressor forces; Feudalism refers to the feudal forces of the country, the Qing ** and Beiyang warlords.

    and so on; Bureaucratic capitalism refers to the large bourgeoisie and the suffocation of large amounts of wealth by relying on political power.

    National capitalism refers to entrepreneurs who have founded modern Chinese national capitalist enterprises; Capitalism is a general term.

    Second, the essence is different.

    Imperialism is an upgraded version of capitalism, with a greater pursuit of markets and profits than capitalism; Feudalism was based on a closed natural economy.

    There is a fundamental difference between capitalism, which is the main one, and capitalism, which demands openness and plunder, from the other three.

    Third, the country is different.

    Bureaucratic capitalism is peculiar to China. This is similar to China's special semi-colonial and semi-feudal society in the second half of the 19th century and the second half of the 20th century.

    Inseparable, it is by the comprador class.

    Evolved, in the twenties and thirties of the last world, it was the four major families.

    as the representative of a variety of enterprises to start a large **; The other three exist in various countries of the world.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    From the point of view of the path of development and social status, national capitalism was born and developed in the process of semi-colonial and semi-feudalization, and from the very beginning it was oppressed and constrained by both foreign capitalism and domestic feudal forces, especially in the process of the formation and expansion of bureaucratic capitalism, the national industry was devastated and shrunk day by day.

    Therefore, China's national capitalism has been slow and difficult in the process of its development, and national capitalism has never become the main form of China's social economy.

    The Chinese national bourgeoisie is politically powerless, bound by the oppression of imperialism, feudalism and bureaucratic capitalism, and while it has a compromise with foreign capitalism and its own feudalism, it also has a revolutionary demand to oppose the oppression of foreign capitalism and its own feudalism and bureaucratic capitalism.

    Bureaucratic capitalism, on the other hand, relied on state power and dependence on imperialism, and emerged in the form of a monopoly at a moment's notice, and thus developed rapidly. During the Anti-Japanese War, bureaucratic capital swelled dramatically; After the end of the war, bureaucratic capital reached its peak. It is precisely for this reason that bureaucratic capitalism represents the interests of the big landlords, the big bourgeoisie, and imperialism, and has greatly hindered the development of China's modern social productive forces.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Oh, the Japanese chapter is different, the bureaucrat is very national, he is just a different bureaucrat, he is a very bad name, it is better to only recognize it.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Bureaucratic capitalism is the object of the Chinese revolution, national capitalism is a progressive economy in China's modern history, and the national bourgeoisie that develops national capitalism is the object of the democratic revolution.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The nature of the bureaucratic capital of the four major families of the Kuomintang is feudal comprador state monopoly capitalism. The reason for the transformation of state monopoly capitalism is that the deep root cause of the transformation from private monopoly to state monopoly is the contradiction between the socialization of production and the monopoly capitalism of private people, and the private monopoly has been difficult to adapt to the tremendous development of social productive forces under the capitalist mode of production, forcing the state to directly participate in the reproduction process of social capital and regulate the operation of social economy; Tongjin also forced the movement of private monopoly capital to rely on state power, and the state and private monopoly capital merged to form state monopoly capitalism.

    Bureaucratic capital refers to the economy established and developed by the rulers with the power of state power. It is a product of political undemocracy and economic underdevelopment.

    Characteristics of bureaucratic capital: Bureaucratic capital is a form of primitive accumulation of capital that uses political privileges to redistribute property, mainly through plundering in the field of commodity circulation and finance. Bureaucratic capital emerges from three different but interrelated forms of capital, and survives, operates and develops in these three forms of capital.

    These three different forms of capital are: private bureaucratic capital; state capital managed by bureaucracy; Other private capital controlled by bureaucracy (see Wang Yanan, "Analysis of the Theory of Chinese Bureaucratic Capital", Principles of China's Economy, pp. 381-407, Guangdong Economic Publishing House, 1998).

    of the so-called bureaucratic capital.

    The "predatory redistribution" characterizes it as the process of constantly re-converting the state and other private capital that has been generated and accumulated into the capital owned by the bureaucracy through various means of stealing the state treasury and trading power for money.

    Comprador: (1).

    In the old days, the government or the wealthy were in charge of procurement and chores; (2)

    Intermediaries and brokers in the domestic market for foreign capitalists in the commercial, banking, insurance, industrial and mining industries, transport industries, etc.

    The comprador we usually refer to is a special class derived from the late Qing Dynasty. The comprador himself was an official of the imperial court, and at the same time ran his own industry (more than foreigners), using his position to make a profit. Compradors have been very popular since the Westernization Movement, and at that time, the local officials who engaged in the Westernization Movement were basically compradors.

    The capital of the comprador capitalist is the capital of the comprador capital. On the one hand, these people help foreigners to do business and rely on foreigners to survive, and on the other hand, they test their own economic strength to do business. It's comprador capital.

    Comprador capital is comprador, feudal, and monopolistic.

Related questions
10 answers2024-03-21

It was the period of the First World War (1914-1918), during which the Great Powers were busy with the war in Europe and relaxed their economic aggression against China. National capitalism was able to develop rapidly, and this period is therefore called the first period of the development of national capitalism.

6 answers2024-03-21

Towards prosperity! That's the reality!

5 answers2024-03-21

The "Anglo-Saxon capitalism" represented by Britain and the United States advocates a complete free market economy, emphasizes market competition, and does not advocate excessive state intervention in the economic activities of enterprises and individuals. Also known as liberal capitalism.

11 answers2024-03-21

1) The American Revolutionary War of 1775-1783, after eight years of war, the people of the North American colonies finally overthrew British colonial rule and won independence The American Civil War, led by Lincoln, promulgated the Emancipation Proclamation The Declaration stated that, beginning on January 1, 1863, the people of any slave-bearing state or specific area thereof would be considered a betrayal of the Union, and that all those who were enslaved should be immediately and forever freed Emancipation Proclamation It stimulated the revolutionary enthusiasm of black slaves, 2) After the independence of the United States, both capitalist industry and the southern plantation economy developed, and by the mid-19th century, the southern slave plantation economy increasingly hindered the development of the capitalist economy The United States, through the Civil War, abolished slavery and promoted the further development of capitalism to resolve this social contradiction >>>More

22 answers2024-03-21

Absolutely. The United States, Japan, South Korea, and many others are. >>>More