Having children is not an investment

If you look at it from a purely economic point of view, it is indeed a long-term investment, and this investment is very risky. Investment is your hard work, and the expected return is the joy that your children bring to you and support the elderly.

But if you look at it from an ethical point of view, it's not an investment, it's your obligation to have children, to raise them, and it's also their obligation to support the elderly when your children grow up. This is the crystallization and manifestation of love, something that cannot be replaced by money.

Hope mine can help you.

Having children is an investment, and it is a long-term investment. The reward is the joy of the heavenly wheel you receive, and the continuation of your life.

One thousand percent is. According to the Chinese idea, it is to raise children to prevent old age. It is a long-term investment. Most of the time it's not a win, it's not a loss!

It's not... That's the meat that fell off your body...

That's your blood...

That's not an investment... Investment is about returns, but children are not a bet on you to live in a big house and drive a luxury car in the future.

Yes, though, it's very likely that the investment will fail.

If you look at it with the offset method, this is a never-ending, endless cycle of investment.

Let's put morality aside from this question.

Hehe can't be measured in money.

If having children is an investment, are you the product of that investment?

From an economic point of view, childbearing can be seen as an investment. Having a child requires a lot of time, effort, and money, but it also comes with some potential benefits and rewards.

Here are some of the possible fertility return on investment:

2.Workforce of the Future: Children may grow up to be valuable workforce for their families and society, creating income and value for their families.

3.Family Wealth Inheritance: Children may inherit the family's property and wealth when they become adults, increasing the family's assets and wealth.

4.Psychological satisfaction: Having a child will also bring some psychological rewards, such as family happiness, satisfaction in the parent-child relationship, etc.

It should be noted that there are also certain risks and costs associated with childbirth, such as children's health problems and education costs. Therefore, whether childbearing is an investment also needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, and families should decide whether to have children based on their own financial capabilities and living needs.

I don't know where to start, we have gradually changed from the previous call for family planning and fewer children to the current encouragement of childbearing, all kinds of second and third children. It's as if it's no longer up to each couple to decide how many children they want. And at this time, all kinds of devil experts ran out, Chen Wenling, chief economist of the China Center for International Economic Exchanges, said at the "Sina Finance Night of the 2023 Consumer Expo":

Young people should have children, they should not lie flat as they are now, it is not right for young people not to have children. According to behavioral economics, children are not only children, children are also consumer goods, and children are long-term consumer goods, durable consumer goods that can bring you long-term returns. According to this theory, young people should have children, which is a worthwhile investment.

I don't understand how this came out of the mouth of an expert, whether it was a metaphor or if it was really in the eyes of this so-called expert. A child is a child, the crystallization of love and the continuation of life between husband and wife, not some so-called consumer goods and investment products. I wonder what the children of this expert will think when they hear this expert's history describe themselves?

Fertility should come from voluntariness and love, there is no right or wrong, I believe, I changed my pretend to search for the country is to allow every people to enjoy the freedom of reproduction, and more importantly, I don't like to link feelings and economy, such as the lack of fingers and fruit family affection are quantified, that even animals are not as good, some experts only made me feel funny before, this directly made me feel a little inappropriate.

This question relates to one of the more fundamental concepts in economic theory: family economics. In family economics, children are often seen as an investment, rather than a consumer product in the traditional sense.

The investment characteristics of children are first and foremost long-term. From an economic point of view, a family's expenditure on the education and upbringing of their children can be seen as an investment aimed at raising and training a capable, qualified, and conscious successful adult who in turn creates more value and wealth.

Secondly, the investment characteristics of children also lie in the returns that can be obtained. The most obvious reward is the financial freedom and security that children will achieve in the future, their employment income and wealth appreciation, and the care and nurturing grace of their parents in the future.

From these perspectives, children are more like a long-term, sustainable investment than a short-term, immediate consumer product.

Of course, this is not to say that we see our children exclusively as investments, goods, or commodities. On the contrary, children play a very important role both within the family and in society, because they are the embodiment of life, personality and hunger personality. They are the most important and precious part of the family and cannot be reduced to an item or commodity.

As parents, we need to do our best to create the best environment and conditions for our children to develop so that they can fully display their talents and realize their values.

In conclusion, although children can be seen as an investment to some extent, their status and role as a vital part of the family are more important. Whether it is from the perspective of economics or the value of life, we should respect and protect our next generation, and plan for their future in the best possible future.

Economists call children a long-term consumer durable, which means that it takes a lot of time and resources to give birth and raise children, and unlike other consumer goods, the benefits of parenting can last a lifetime, so they are regarded as a long-term consumer durable.

First, treating children as consumer goods is bound to lead to a misunderstanding of their identity, status, and value. Children should not be treated as consumer goods, as they exist as part of human reproduction. Children are a part that cannot be given up, and they are not just one of the consumer goods that can be selected in the state.

Nor should they be seen as mere long-cycle consumer goods that require an investment of time and resources.

Second, treating children as consumer goods can also influence our attitudes towards parenting. From a consumer goods perspective, parenting is like buying a fancy piece of equipment, which can lead us to focus on the resources we need and ignore the needs of our children. Parenting requires a wealth of experiences such as parental companionship, love, and education, which requires more energy and inner wisdom than just an investment in material resources.

Finally, treating children as consumer goods is more likely to lead us to underestimate the long-term benefits of investing in them. Although it may take a significant investment of time and money in the process of childbearing and parenting, it is a long-term investment. Our children will be the decision-makers, creators, and leaders of tomorrow, and their value will continue to grow over time.

As a result, treating children as consumer goods limits our long-term view of the value of parenting and can lead us to overlook important investment opportunities.

On the question of whether children are consumer goods, I think the following five aspects can be drawn from different economic perspectives:

1.Factors of production: In economics, labor is often seen as a factor of production, and children are also one of the future laborers. Therefore, from this perspective, children can be seen as a factor of production rather than a consumer product.

2.Economic investment: Some economists believe that children will be financially rewarding in the long run, and therefore see them as an economic investment rather than a consumer product. This investment may be made through the child's future income, inheritance, etc.

3.Household expenses: Families often include children as an expense in their budgets when writing their budgets. From this perspective, children can be considered as a consumer product, as families provide support for children's needs such as education, medical care, living expenses, etc.

4.Social cost: In terms of social cost, children are also seen as a long-term consumer durable, because the cost of raising children is not just a problem within the family, but also affects society as a whole.

For example, society may need to provide a range of education, medical care, social security and other public services to support children's growth and development.

5.Human perspective: From a broader perspective, we can also see children as the future of humanity.

According to this view, we should respect the rights and autonomy of children, and not just treat them as a consumer durable. In this sense, efforts to nurture children are made in order for them to become people who live independently on their own.

The identity of a child is a complex issue. To put it simply, children are neither a consumer good nor an investment.

Children are not consumer goods:

1.Consumer goods can be disposed of at will, but children are not. Parents have relevant parenting responsibilities and obligations, and they are not allowed to abandon or abuse them morally.

2.Consumer products can measure their function and utility, but their value to children cannot be measured. As a member of the family, the meaning of children is far more than theirs.

3.Consumer goods can be selected and replaced at will, but children are not allowed to replace them. Once born, the relationship between parents and children is lifelong.

Children are not exactly an investment either:

1.The purpose of investment products is mainly to obtain economic gains, but the motivation for having children is complex, not just to get a return on the file. The emotional factor is just as important as the need to continue the bloodline.

2.There are certain risks and uncertainties in investment, but having children is generally a responsibility and obligation of the family. So it's not exactly a rational investment behavior.

3.There are different asset allocations that can be chosen for investment, but the options for having children are limited and difficult to quantify returns.

In summary, the identity of the children is unique and does not belong to simple consumer goods or investment products. The significance of its existence far outweighs the costs incurred, but it also brings responsibilities and obligations to the family. Having children is one of the most important things in the world, and its purpose and motivation are complex.

It can be said that children have emotional significance, a sense of social responsibility and expected future returns for a family at the same time, and they are a multi-dimensional existence. Therefore, children are not consumer goods or investment products that can be viewed rationally. The real value far outweighs the costs and inputs it incurs.

From an economic point of view, fertility can be seen as both consumption and investment:

1.Childbearing can be seen as a consumption, as the costs of childbearing often outweigh the financial benefits of the child. Having a child requires paying for the cost of childcare, including medical expenses, education expenses, food, clothing and other living expenses, which are often higher than the child's future wealth appreciation.

2.Childbearing can also be seen as an investment, as children are the future workforce and can make a long-term, sustainable contribution to the economy. Furthermore, the good education that children receive has the potential to make great contributions to the progress of society, the country, and even mankind.

Having children brings a return on investment in terms of the country's demographic contribution, increased potential labor force (demographic dividend) and social stability.

Therefore, the definition of childbirth as consumption or investment can be judged based on a variety of factors such as a person's personal and family circumstances, economic goals, and economic and social environment.