Is the house built under the unified planning of the rural areas a permanent property right?

Updated on Three rural 2024-04-27
23 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The maximum tenure of a townhouse is 70 years. This is all known to people, so can there be common property rights for rural houses?

    Rural Land Use Certificate.

    Rural housing use land has been proven also known as houses to prove. The homestead foundation in the countryside refers to the land rights enjoyed by the members of the organization under the rural economy. Enjoy the right to build all the land.

    According to the relevant laws and regulations, the right of homestead land shall enjoy the right to share and use the land in accordance with the law, and have the right to use the land and its subsidiary rights by itself. The right to use Homestead requires a strict real-name authentication system. According to the relevant law, rural villagers can only have a family base, and the area must not exceed the average standard.

    When building houses, villagers should conform to standard land-use plans and try to use the original homestead and intravenous ones. The residential land of rural villagers shall be approved by the people of the township (town) and approved by the people of the county level, but if it involves the occupation of agricultural land, the approval procedure shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Land Management Law. Rural villagers**, after renting a house, then apply for a homestead, which is not approved.

    Can property rights be commonly used in rural houses? There must be a house in the countryside.

    Perpetual property rights?

    With a family, it will be neglected to be aware. Seniors can also donate excess value. In addition to the traditional concept, the biggest obstacle to the "family" is that the bank should be a mortgage.

    When the old man will mortgage the property, most of the houses have already been used in the 50s, how is the house going for 20 years? The bank reverses the mortgage on the house after 15 years, and the remaining 5 years, how does the bank ** it? Although the Property Law has an "automatic renewal" provision, only the Property Law cannot be certified.

    Once the permanent property is realized, the value of the house itself will be greatly extended. As long as there is a set of rooms, the old man will not get old. It is even possible to donate the excess value of the house outside the elderly.

    Give to the society and win the namesake of the same name.

    Levy compensation.

    When state land is expropriated, the value of the land itself will not only make up for the current value of the land, but also take into account the expected compensation and foreseeable future value; In compensating for the acquisition, the adjacent landowners are also compensated. Lose the people.

    Scope and standard of compensation for land acquisition in other countries:

    1. Compensation for the loss of land or other subjects; 2. Compensation for business losses, the standard of which is the same benefit as other land investments; 3 topics all related to damages. The current land acquisition compensation in our country is generally the value of the building to the land, and the land in recent decades is also possible, if a permanent property is established, the land acquisition compensation will include the value of the land itself, that is, the cost of buying or renting the same land nearby.

    Is there a permanent property for a rural house? The answer to this question is obviously negative. Rural areas have their own land, but they also move with the city, so rural houses have permanent property.

    This vulnerability does not exist in the future. Only obeying the law is only a prerequisite for a happy life.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    No. There is no permanent property right to buy any land in our country, and the ownership of land belongs to the state and the collective, while the land for self-built houses in rural areas belongs to the collective, so the property rights of such houses are not permanent.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    It's not a freehold property, it's all 70 years now, and it can be automatically renewed when it expires, and it's not yet time to worry about the future, so it doesn't matter if it's not a freehold property.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Personally, I think that the houses built in the countryside do not have permanent property rights, they only have the right to use, not permanent property rights.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    It is a permanent property right, because our village is a house built by unified planning, and now the village cadres have counted the housing information, and they will soon issue us the real estate certificate.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    This is necessary for rural revitalization and is in line with the Rural Revitalization Law

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It is true that the village is planned to build a house, but only at this stageOnly in a very small number of demonstration sites in rural areas where conditions permit, it is an inevitable trend for villages to gradually plan and build houses in a unified manner in the future, and it is indeed possible that rural households will not have to build their own houses in the future. Unified planning and centralized construction of houses refers to the planning of a piece of land for the centralized construction of centralized resettlement housing for rural households. The countryside is built in a unified mannerThe key purpose of the house is to meet the requirements of the new rural plan, according to the accurate measurement of the current houses of rural households, provide a certain amount of demolition subsidies, and then promote the unified construction of houses, and sell them to farmers at a price less than the market price of similar houses, and then implement the unified planning of the countryside, so as to make the countryside look cleaner and tidier. The planning and design of the house and the capital construction are all funded by the state or the village collective, and the type of construction is the same as that of the commercial and residential residential community, which is divided into buildings, modules and suites. Some of them are built in cities and towns, some are built in county seats, and they are all built in the countryside.

    Due to the development trend of China's overall economic level, the wage level of rural peasants has also been greatly improved, and many people have paid for the construction of new houses, and the interior decoration is the same as that of villas in the city.

    However, because there is no unified overall plan, many rural houses are all here and there, which is a serious waste of land resources, and some even encroach on agricultural land. There are also some wealthy people in the city who go to the countryside to buy homestead land to build country villas, or build villas in violation of the natural environment, such as the construction of villas in violation of regulations in Qinling, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, is the worst case, and the rich buy land and build houses to destroy the rural environment. After the construction of centralized housing, the size of the living area is generally divided equally according to the size of the family, and the larger the number of people, the larger the area of the house allocated to the family, and the smaller the area of the house allocated to the small population.

    In other words, the land use of the centralized resettlement housing is still in fact owned by the whole people in the village, and the peasant households only have settled ownership and cannot be bought and sold freely. The infrastructure of the countryside is in the palm of your handThe people-oriented standard can only be carried out under the condition of following the wishes of most of the villagers' good friends. In the vast region of China, the situation is different in all parts of the country, and it is hoped that in the process of implementation, we can carry out improvisation according to the local details, so that good policies can be truly implemented, and strive to solve all kinds of difficulties in the daily life of rural households, and then change the difference in the daily life of small urban residents.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It is true that the unified planning of the villages to build houses will not require farmers to build their own houses in the future. However, at this stage, there are only a few demonstration sites in rural areas with conditions, and it is an inevitable trend for villages to gradually plan and build houses in a unified manner in the future.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Yes, it is a real thing to build houses in the rural areas in a unified way, and the peasants will no longer need to build their own houses in the future, because now the state wants to unify the rural areas together, and the rural areas should also increase their development efforts, and now many rural areas have already been uniformly planned.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The news of unified planning and construction of houses in rural areas is indeed true, and in the future, farmers do not need to build their own houses; The main basis is that this is stipulated in the new policy that has just been introduced in our country.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    I think it's true, because many farmers now have only one homestead, and they need to get the consent of the village committee to build their own houses.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    In China, there is no permanent property right to buy any land, and the ownership of land belongs to the state and the collective, but the use of the land is different for different years.

    Article 12 The maximum term of land use right transfer shall be determined according to the following purposes:

    1) Residential land for 70 years;

    2) 50 years of industrial land;

    3) 50 years of land for education, science and technology, culture, health, and sports;

    4) Commercial, tourism and entertainment land for 40 years;

    5) Fifty years for comprehensive or other land use.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    In rural areas, when unified planning is carried out, houses should also meet uniform standards. Farmers can also build their own houses, but they need to be approved by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Now, with the improvement of the policy, it is no longer possible to build houses at will, and the unified planning of rural areas means that villages should prepare construction plans in the future, and new houses can no longer be built at will, and must be built in accordance with the plan.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Yes, this is already being done in most places, and there are some places where you can build your own house.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    The new rural planning is a bright prospect that specifically guides the development trend of the new rural construction, a strategic layout to achieve the overall goal of a well-off society in an all-round way, and a legal document for the discipline of management methods and new rural construction. At this stage, there are three key ways to build houses in the unified planning of rural areas: new rural planning; off-site poverty alleviation and demolition; Unified store location selection and farmer construction.

    Regardless of which method is used to carry out unified planning and capital construction, it is necessary to obtain a group land use right certificate and a rural construction planning permit when building a house.

    According to the requirements of the Property Law, the houses on the ground belong to the legal property of the masses, and the masses have the rights and interests to occupy, use and dispose of them in accordance with regulations. Therefore, the house on the ground is the reasonable, legal and legal property of the people in the village.

    The unified construction of a house in the countryside will also be to the relevant departments of the superior leadership, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the application for unified planning and construction, the said higher leadership related doors, that is, agriculture and animal husbandry, land resources, infrastructure and other related doors, they only want to go to the unified planning to build a house after winning the review.

    Before the unified planning and construction of houses in the villages, the organizers of the unified planning and construction of houses, in other words, the competent authorities, will sign contracts with the masses, and the compensation for the demolition of old houses and the distribution of new houses after the completion of the contract will all establish a viewpoint. The houses built by the unified planning of the village are the same as the rural homestead of the peasant households, the land rights belong to the village collectives, the property rights of the houses belong to the villagers, and the houses built by the overall planning of the group are generally collective property rights, and the peasant households themselves do not need to apply for property rights certificates, but the peasant households have permanent settlement ownership.

    Therefore, the rural homestead is owned by the whole people, and your homestead use right can continue to be used and inherited to future generations, but there must be a house on the rural homestead, and it cannot be idle, if it is not used, it may be taken back by the village collective within the period of more than the idle use. The former rural homestead land shall be retrieved by the village and disposed of in accordance with the overall plan for rural development.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    At present, the houses built by the unified planning of the rural areas do not belong to the permanent property rights, but belong to the collective; The original homestead will also be replanned and allocated.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    There is no such thing as freehold, most homesteads will be re-planned, and the land will be used uniformly.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Not freehold. The original homestead will be collected by the village committee for unified arrangement, so as to effectively use all the land.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    After the construction of centralized housing is completed, the size of the housing area is generally distributed evenly according to the size of the family, and the area of the housing allocated to the family with a large population is larger, and the area of the housing allocated to the family with a small population is smaller. The allocated centralized resettlement housing has no individual property rights, only collective property rights, that is to say, the nature of the land for centralized resettlement housing is still owned by rural collectives, and farmers only have the right to live and use, and cannot buy and sell freely. It is true that the rural areas have a unified plan to build houses, but at present they are only experimenting with a small number of rural areas where conditions permit, and the gradual unified planning and construction of houses in the rural areas in the future is the trend of the times, and it is indeed possible that the peasants will not need to build their own houses in the future.

    The construction of the new countryside still grasps the principle of people-oriented, and can only be carried out under the condition of following the wishes of the majority of peasant friends. China has a vast territory, and the situation varies from place to place, and it is hoped that when it is implemented, it can be adapted according to the specific local conditions, so that good policies can be effectively implemented, and the various living problems of the peasants can be effectively solved, so as to narrow the living gap between urban and rural residents. It is still too early to conclude whether farmers will not need to build their own houses in the future, but it is certain that in the future, there will be more and more procedures to go through to build new houses in rural areas, and the control will become stricter and stricter.

    Some wealthy people in the city go to the countryside to buy homesteads and farmland to build villas in the countryside, or build villas in violation of the environment, such as the illegal construction of villas in Qinling, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, is the worst example, and the rich people buy land and build houses to destroy the rural environment.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    It's true, now that many places have started to do this, farmers don't need to build their own houses, and at the same time they don't have to be in the bases.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Really, now that there are corresponding policies in place, you don't need to build your own house, you can have a better life.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    It is true, and in this way, the life of the rural areas can be better improved, and the quality of the rural development can also be improved. It's the same, and the state will build houses for the countryside, which will also improve the quality of life of the peasants.

Related questions
5 answers2024-04-27

The standard of compensation is different, and the legal basis is the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases >>>More

19 answers2024-04-27

The reason why rural areas should handle real estate certificates in a unified manner is that the state divides personal property clearly in order to better manage it in a unified manner. The main advantage of this for farmers is that the house you own is indeed recognized by the state.

5 answers2024-04-27

Starting from the Shang Dynasty reform, a solid foundation was laid. The abduction and deception of the Qin kings of the past dynasties laid the premise of unification. The true meaning of reunification is that there is no more war.

13 answers2024-04-27

I don't know what you're referring to that can't be compared, each dynasty has gains and losses, of course it can't be compared. The entire Song Dynasty suffered from foreign invasions, and the Song Dynasty emphasized literature and light military force, and lost in wars year after year, and was oppressed every year, so it could not be regarded as unity in the full sense. During the Tang Dynasty, the territory was very large, as far as Xinjiang, which was our territory. >>>More

3 answers2024-04-27

Houses built on one's own land in rural areas are illegal structures and should be demolished. >>>More