If you want to make a simple small square for the money from selling trees in the village, can you u

The money from the sale of trees in the village belongs to the village collective, and a simple small square in the village allows the villagers to have a place for leisure and entertainment to do good things for all the villagers. Of course, it is okay to use the collective money to do good things for everyone, but it would be better if all the villagers were allowed to vote and get the support of the villagers. Yes.

The village sells trees to build a simple small square. That's a good thing. It should be studied and approved by a meeting of the villagers' representatives.

After reporting to the relevant departments in the township for approval, you can use the money from the sale of trees to build a simple small square. The construction of a small square is very beneficial to the villagers. This is to do practical things for the people.

It is okay to use the land to do things for the village, but you can't use it for individuals, because the money from selling trees belongs to public property.

The village project is now fair and open, and it must be voted on by the villagers' committee, and two-thirds of the money can be used.

According to the Organic Law on the name of the village, a meeting of villagers' representatives may be held, and two-thirds of the deputies may agree to it.

This is so good that it has brought a place for entertainment to the villagers, and they can gather in the square to do exercises and twist Yangge if they have nothing to do.

It needs to be decided by the village committee and the villagers' representatives through collective discussion!

The money from the sale of trees in the village can be used to build a simple small square, and the income from the village is used for the development of the village and the construction of the village.

Reasonable, according to the law, if the homestead is not used for a long time, the village committee can take it back!

Suggestion: Build a house now, you can't take it back if you have a house!

The homestead approval is time-limited, not permanent, so the relevant departments have the right to return.

It will be withdrawn free of charge, and the expired approval will be invalid.

Answer, build a house immediately, and then go to the real estate department to apply for a house license, no house license is also not allowed, you have an expired approval is useless, after building a house to find someone to help, go to apply for a house license, don't be stingy with that money, you must have a sense of law, or you don't move anything.

Sign a land requisition agreement with you and compensate for three years' seedling fees.

or reallocate the contracted land.

Yes, the land use contract is the legal basis for you to be a member of the collective economic organization of the village, and you are one of the legal owners of the collective land of the village, and of course you can share the money.

Land, construction.

Lawyer Liu Jiang of Zongheng Legal Network.

What a service life! Lie to you, once you use your homestead, it will be difficult for you to come back, I have a ready-made example, no matter how nice he says, don't be soft-hearted, or you will come back in the future and wait to cry.

The village has this right, and if there are no buildings on your homestead, the village can take it back.

Now I am facing the same problem, what should I do?

Idle land in rural areas is collectively owned, and after a villagers' meeting or a resolution of the congress is convened, it shall be handled in accordance with the resolution, and other villagers have no right to interfere.

Land Management Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 8 The land in urban areas of cities belongs to the state.

Land in rural areas and on the outskirts of cities shall be owned by peasant collectives, except as provided by law for the State; Homesteads, self-cultivated land, and self-cultivated mountains belong to peasant collectives.

Organic Law of the People's Republic of China on Villagers' Committees

Article 24.

The following matters involving the interests of the villagers can only be handled after discussion and decision by the villagers' meeting:

1) The village's personnel and subsidy standards for those who enjoy the compensation for lost work;

2) the use of the proceeds from the village collective economy;

3) The establishment and fund-raising of public welfare undertakings in the village and the construction contracting program;

4) Land contract management plan;

5) The project establishment and contracting plan of the village collective economic project;

6) the use of the homestead;

VII) the use and distribution of land requisition compensation fees;

8) Disposing of village collective property by lending, leasing or other means;

9) Other matters involving the interests of the villagers that the villagers' meeting deems should be discussed and decided by the villagers' meeting.

The villagers' meeting may authorize the villagers' representative meeting to discuss and decide on the matters provided for in the preceding paragraph.

Where the law has other provisions on matters concerning the discussion and decision of the property and the rights and interests of members of village collective economic organizations, follow those provisions.

The rural collective grain drying place is distributed to each farmer for use, and now it is taken back to make a cultural square, and some villagers do not agree to solve it?

As long as it's not planted in the village, it doesn't matter.

If the tree was there before the land use right was obtained, and the right holder could not be found, then the tree belonged to the village collective. After all, the ownership of land in rural areas is owned by the village collective, and the trees on the land also belong to the village collective.

Such a one-shot deal should have been paid with one hand and delivered with the other, but now it is difficult to only have a verbal agreement, as long as you can find someone, it is not a big problem.

Yes, what about rural people? Isn't the city developing from the countryside? Now the environment in the countryside is better than in the city, what about the urban people? Why do you look down on rural people? Everyone is equal, what is the difference between high and low?

Now no one looks down on rural people, and the low spiritual world will make others laugh. Don't mess around.

Hehe, just correct your attitude and don't care too much about other people's opinions.

People who look down on the countryside are self-conscious guys, so they don't have to care.

You go and post it yourself, especially the rural people, how the city people insult the rural people.

Hehe, you said that this passage is quite realistic, support.