Debate Tournament The pros and cons of liberal style for the growth of college students

Very old topic ......

First of all, grasp the definition: loose management is absolutely not the same as loose management, to prevent the other party from exaggerating the disadvantages of loose management such as the phenomenon of free and loose, draw appropriate boundaries, and expand the role of the word "loose" in loose management as much as possible under the premise of not denying that loose management also has drawbacks, which can be determined according to the main line of your own vision;

Secondly, set standards: this is not necessarily anyway, it can be linked to "growth", how to set it up, such as setting it to be more conducive to the two management systems under the college students to face the society in the future, cultivate their own quality, etc., to be linked to the advantages of loose management. If it is set as the accumulation of academic knowledge, etc., that is the category that the other party wants to say, and we should try to lean on our side;

Then it is to expand and extend, so as to determine the main line: for example, the aspects mentioned above can be refined into several directions, such as the concept of loose management, means, process, etc., each small direction is in line with the previous set of the comparison standard, that is, through these aspects of the demonstration, which requires you to determine the main line according to yourself. In this way, the argument is basically completed, and when actually fighting, we only need to pay attention to whether the situation on the field is under our own control, do not run too far, and also pay attention to whether the opponent is directing the battlefield to our disadvantage, and we must control the situation on the field.

It's basically a matter of argumentation, and the other party can't jump out of your control after setting up the main line.

In addition, don't completely copy the existing manuscripts on the Internet, I have done many judges, and I have seen that the manuscripts copied died miserably ......in the endBecause if you don't change at all, the other party will also design you according to this and completely limit you to death, then you will be completely passive from the beginning of the theory......

"Loose management does more harm than good to college students" sharp question example:

1. Innovation is not only in the wide.

Only under the management of the version of the loose style can it be innovative, people will eat, cats will also eat, does it mean that cats are more advanced than people? On the contrary, the innovation rate of all kinds of new equipment in military schools is higher than that of our ordinary schools.

2. It's not a matter of mechanism, it's that the student's self-control is not strong, it's his personal question. When it comes to the advantages, it is the credit of the relaxed management, and the disadvantages are because of the students themselves. University is to learn to improve, students are not strong in self-control, you management should help us make up for the shortcomings, and make up for the weaknesses instead of promoting the strengths and avoiding the weaknesses.

3. No one cares about going to society - no one cares about going to society, my wife and husband are in charge, and the company leaders are in charge, plus so much pressure, it can stimulate people's potential even more. On the contrary, loose management is too comfortable, breeds inertia, and develops a lazy and ambitious attitude, which is not conducive to our society.

4. The loose type is more conducive to improving self-control - the ideal is really beautiful, but the implementation target college students, especially the children of 8090 now, hedonism has become a habit, the supervision is not effective, being a monk for a day and hitting the clock for a day, the inertia is stronger, look around, do you still have to lie to yourself?

5. Individuality, divergent thinking is the management of human behavior, not human thinking.

Today's debate tournament has a strict system, does it shackle your mind? On the contrary, many college students are confused about the future, follow the rules every day, be a monk for a day and hit the clock for a day, the fighting spirit is worn out, and they are getting farther and farther away from their dreams.

Management is bai

Refers to the role of the manager in a specific organizational environment, through the implementation of the plan, the organization, leadership, control, etc.

Internal energy is a general term for a series of activities that use the organization's limited resources to achieve organizational goals.

Loose management is based on the premise that the objectives and effects of actions remain unchanged. Managers have less control over the managed and more free management. Liberal allows both the person who manages and the person being managed to act according to their current situation and personal wishes.

It not only conforms to the reality but also promotes the cultivation of talents.

Strict management is a management style that forces the managed to act according to the manager's wishes through hard terms and severe punishments.

First of all, admit that permissive management is not unmanaged.

1. How to adopt relaxed management for universities with different self-control capabilities? To what extent?

2.What should I do if some college students have poor self-control?

3 Is the loose management of the opposing party suitable for every area of university life?

4. According to the survey conducted by the Youth Research Center of Fudan University, the students' self-evaluation shows that their learning status after entering the university is "worse" than that of high school.

5 The vicious circle of the stronger and weaker and weaker caused by this kind of management is not in line with the basic theoretical norms of civilized society and the protection of vulnerable groups, nor is it in line with the requirements of building a harmonious society.

There are also materials, but they haven't been organized, if you want, give me an email.

May I ask what period and what is the big period of loose management that you mean by copying and defending friends?

What kind of university can you compare with at what time? Ask him to give a standard!

The refutation of the argument that college students fall in love does more harm than goodWriting ideas: First of all, you should disassemble the debate topic, then put forward your own opinions, stand firm in your argument, and then give evidence to prove your own views. The focus is on being clear and resonating with the audience.

Body:

First of all, let's take a look at the topic, the love of college students, in fact, this comparison is difficult to say, and it is not the same as what the brothers said before. When it comes to falling in love, in fact, if you think about it, we are in college, especially in the early days, I believe that our relationship is not very mature. Is it really all about that kind of love?

Therefore, many college students' love is immature.

The main purpose of our college is to study, of course, some schools no longer set up obstacles to love or even marriage, but this does not mean that the benefits of falling in love outweigh the disadvantages.

First, there will definitely be a sacrifice of time for each other, I don't believe that two people can be consistent in everything they do, if so, then these two people will definitely not be able to live together;

Second, love needs to be irrigated and cultivated, which requires two people to think about each other, which will definitely distract part of their energy;

Third, when two people fall in love, they will definitely spend less time with everyone than most of their classmates, and many opportunities to exercise their abilities will be lost. On the whole, there are relatively few people who can handle the relationship between each other well in love.

To sum up, I think college love still does more harm than good.

Universities should give students a space for free development. Tolerant management, students' freedom of behavior and freedom of thought are conducive to the development of creativity and the development of an innovative country.