At the beginning of man, nature is good, is this sentence true?

I think that when we are born as human beings, it is like chaos that has not yet opened, and there is no difference between good and evil.

Good and evil are distinguished by intent. And the child grabs something to eat out of instinct, and he grabs it only because he wants it, and the purpose is not to hurt the other person with whom he robs.

Good and evil are gradually formed by the influence of the living environment in the later period.

People can't be born to judge whether he is good or evil, maybe there are some factors in some aspects, but they can't judge the right and wrong of things, this is a right and wrong concept taught by later generations, and it must be judged by the difference in his education when he grows up, and it is constantly improved to educate the next generation of people, and the society is progressive.

Oh, I don't understand philosophy, just talk about my thoughts, that can't be said to be human nature but human instinct, all animals are to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages, this is nothing to blame, just live in society, in order to ensure normal social order, must abide by some social rules, because it is impossible for everyone's interests to be satisfied, so we must learn to live in harmony with others, make sacrifices, this is indeed the ideological education that children can obtain after a certain age, people need to have faith, These rules are defined by us as morality.

That's right. People who believe in goodness are more optimistic and enthusiastic about others, more pessimistic about believing in evil and more autistic to prevent people from being autistic, and their hearts are not good or evil, and they are numb and swaying. But faith is not something that can be changed in one sentence, and Mencius made a lot of arguments, and so did Spinoza.

There are no absolutes.

The other party understands that when people are just born, they will not do bad things, so they are good. It's either evil or good.

Misunderstanding, when a person is born, he will not do bad things or do good things, and he should be pure.

Man is born with a blank slate.

Those who are close to Zhu are red, and those who are close to ink are black.

Don't think he's just a child.

The theory of good and evil is just two poles.

It is still debated from ancient times to the present day.

Let's take the middle scoop!

Meaning: At the beginning of human birth, the nature itself is good, and the nature is almost the same, but the acquired environment is different and the education is different, and each other's habits have formed a huge difference.

If you don't educate well from an early age, your good nature will turn bad. The most important way to keep people from bad is to concentrate on educating children consistently.

Original text: At the beginning of man, nature is good. Sex is similar, Xi is far away. If you don't teach, sex is migration. The way of teaching is to be specialized.

Source: "Three Character Classic" Zhenzi Excavation - Song Wang Yinglin.

This sentence comes from a passage in the Confucian classic of filial piety in the Analects: "At the beginning of man, nature is good. Sex is similar, Xi is far away.

From a Confucian point of view, this phrase conveys the basic idea that human nature is originally good, but due to social and environmental influences, human behavior can be distorted and destroyed.

However, this view has been controversial because it ignores the attitudes of other philosophical schools and cultures to this issue. In addition, this issue is also debated, because it involves complex psychological and sociological issues that cannot simply be referred to as right or wrong.

This passage is from Lagudia's torture.

One day in 1935, Lagudia, then the mayor of New York City, was in the courtroom to listen to a bread theft trial. The accused was an old lady, and when the judge asked her if she pleaded guilty, she said: "My two little grandsons have been hungry for two days, and this bread is used to feed them."

The judge impartially ruled: "Do you choose a $10 fine or 10 days of detention?" The helpless old lady had no choice but to "choose" to be detained, because if she could get $10, why not steal a few cents of bread?

As soon as the trial was over, and before the people had dispersed, Mayor Lagudia rose from the gallery, took off his top hat, put $10 into it, and then shouted to those present: "Now, please pay a fine of 50 cents each, which is the cost of our indifference, for our city where our grandmother is going to steal bread to feed her grandson." There was silence in the courtroom, and everyone present, including the judge, silently donated 50 cents.

Such an ending satisfies everyone, and it is time for things to come to a happy end. Kolagudia always felt that the old lady stealing bread was not a simple case problem, and should attract the attention of the whole society. If not, there will be a similar phenomenon of "old ladies stealing bread" in society, and if you want to fundamentally solve the problem of "old ladies stealing bread", you must send a letter to Roosevelt.

In the letter, Lagudia "tortured" Roosevelt: In order to solve her grandson's hunger, the old lady was forced to steal bread. Could it be that as a **, you don't have the slightest responsibility?

The old lady steals bread, which shows that there are many urgent places to be solved in the social security system and other issues!

A person sins for money, and this person is guilty; A person who sins for bread is guilty of this society.

At the beginning of people, their nature is good, their sex is similar, and their habits are far away. It means that people are born good, but because of the different learning environment in the process of growing up, there is a difference between good and bad temperament.

From the Song Dynasty Wang Yinglin's "Three Character Classic". Among the ancient Chinese classics, the "Three Character Classic" is one of the most simple and easy to read books.

The Three Character Classic is based on models, including literature, history, philosophy, astronomy and geography, human ethics, loyalty, filial piety, and righteousness of traditional Chinese culture, and the core ideas include "benevolence, righteousness, sincerity, respect, and filial piety." "While reciting the "Three Character Classic", I learned about common sense, traditional Chinese culture and historical stories, as well as the principles of life and work in the connotation of the story.

Seeing someone debating "whether human nature is good or evil", I feel helpless in my heart, and there are many people who are puzzled by observing the people around me. Two phenomena can be seen from this: social and cultural changes have led to a gap between ancient and modern cultures, and contemporary people generally do not pay enough attention to their own cognition.

I will explain this slightly, hoping to solve some doubts in the reader's mind.

The beginning of the "Three Character Classic": "At the beginning of man, nature is good. Sex is similar, Xi is far away.

If you don't teach, sex is migration. These two sentences start from human nature, tell us that nature can be affected by learning, and emphasize the importance of education for children. The meaning of "goodness" in the text is quite different from the meaning of "kindness" today.

At the beginning of man, nature is good": the initial instinct of man is very direct, efficient and good. This is evident from the newborn baby, sleepy when sleepy, hungry to eat, and cry when there is no other way.

Sex is similar, Xi is far away": Although the nature is similar, but what Xi sees is different from each other, and it may be very different.

If you don't educate well, sex is migration": If you don't educate well, human nature may develop in a bad direction.

It can be seen from this that the meaning of the scripture is completely an exposition of objective facts, and there is no problem with "the inherent goodness of nature" at all. This "good" and the other "evil" are not opposites, and they must be compared together, which only shows that due to the evolution of cultural connotations, the cultural fault between ancient and modern times is still relatively obvious.

From another point of view, if a person attaches importance to the cognition of one's own nature and understands the relationship between education and the human heart, then he can also recognize these truths and will not have such misunderstandings. It can be seen that today's mainstream culture does not pay too much attention to inner self, which is a pity.

The past can be used as a mirror for the present. Knowing one's self-nature is that one's heart is thorough, and it is more efficient in learning and doing things, which can avoid the bad emotions caused by too much influence from the outside world. I sincerely hope that everyone will pay attention to self-cultivation and spend some time on the classics of Chinese culture.

As a few people start with themselves and teach by example, our whole environment will be better.