What will happen to leisure agriculture after the renovation of the greenhouse?

There are bosses who want to invest and come to us to invest in leisure tourism.

Actions that are not supported by documents are all chaotic acts! Therefore, leisure agriculture has to get documents first.

Leisure agriculture is a false proposition under China's existing policy! Pure agriculture is the sale of agricultural products and primary products! There must be no benefit, leisure is an extension of agriculture!

First, arable land is necessary for agriculture, and houses must be built in order to engage in recreational agriculture. No way.

Leisure agriculture can also be developed to a higher level, such as converting these greenhouses into more advanced homestays, which can attract more people to travel here on the one hand, and on the other hand, they can also increase local income, and most importantly, farmers can still work in their favorite industries.

In the future, the development of leisure agriculture should sign a letter of commitment with the developer, and the consequences of illegal occupation of basic farmland shall be borne by themselves, and the cost of demolition shall be borne by themselves!

After the rectification, farmers can develop free occupations, leisure agriculture is also developing in a more sunny, more collective and freer direction, their development will more and more have a goal, hey, this development, they can be more warm tourism, everyone will feel more comfortable.

The rectification is too poor, and things in China are more terrible than the right!

The renovation of greenhouses is mainly to use greenhouses to occupy farmland for living without permission.

It has nothing to do with leisure agriculture at all.

Recreational agriculture can be established in a formal place.

The big shed is a disguised increase in the place of residence, which is an act of indiscriminate construction.

As long as recreational agriculture is established in the right place and in accordance with the relevant regulations, it will not be affected at all!

In fact, I think that the renovation of large sheds is an indispensable stage of development that we have to go through, which is an inevitable trend! Because in the future, it will become centralized production and centralized management, which not only saves manpower, but also improves output, and most importantly, it can ensure quality!

In the future, leisure agriculture should take ecology and seasonality as the development direction, advocate healthy diet, and enjoy a pure ecological natural environment. Sheds can not meet this demand, can be applied to the agricultural production process, but should not be applied to the link of eco-tourism, so there will be a phenomenon of centralized rectification.

If you are a little smaller, you can start to develop your own farmhouse, with the concept of creating a personalized, comfortable and warm small home as the theme to design all the relevant configurations of the farmhouse. Larger households can rely on the local tourism industry to do a commercial development integrating leisure and entertainment, clothing, food, housing and transportation.

That's a bit of a. Isn't there no way to continue recreational agriculture without big sheds? And the shed itself is a loophole, it is completely illegal.

After the rectification, it will be beneficial to leisure agriculture, and the future development will be healthy and natural. For example, engaging in some farmhouses and creative leisure projects, so that being close to nature is the right way to develop.

In my opinion, the future development trend is to concentrate production, centralized management, which can save manpower, convenient management, our hometown is a coastal village, after the renovation, some people set up a tourist farmhouse at home, as well as a family-style hotel, used to entertain some guests who come to the seaside tourism.

Greenhouse can be said to be an indispensable factor in the development of agriculture, especially now these off-season vegetables and off-season fruits are necessary for greenhouses, now if you want to develop, it is basically a joint tourism agriculture, the development of on-site picking agriculture can have a way out.

In fact, I think it can re-emerge in the form of leisure farms, and directly drive the adjustment of the industrial structure, so that farmhouses and fishing ponds, as well as rural experience of free picking, these items are combined, so that the leisure agricultural activities will gradually mature in the future, and will also steadily establish their own sales model.

I think they can be integrated and developed, because many people are living in the city now, and they are all very eager to go to the countryside, and I think we can carry out some farm activities to enrich people's emotions. I think it's great to be able to let people experience farming.

Of course, leisure agriculture can develop with peace of mind, but the process of developing this leisure agriculture requires continuous exploration and hard work, and finally can achieve a very ideal pure liquid state.

The problem of "greenhouses" refers to the illegal activities of industrial and commercial enterprises and individuals in some places who occupy cultivated land to build "private estates", villas, leisure and vacation facilities, and commercial housing in Bisui in the name of building agricultural greenhouses. It is definitely a big obstacle to the development of ecological agriculture.

After this operation, leisure agriculture can develop with peace of mind, and there will be a good development direction.

Legal analysis: In accordance with the requirements of strictly abiding by the red line, highlighting key points, categorical disposal, and concentrated crackdown, the illegal construction behavior of occupying cultivated land, especially permanent basic farmland, to build non-agricultural facilities, and changing the nature and use of land, shall be comprehensively blocked, transported, cleaned up and rectified in accordance with laws and regulations. Emphasis should be placed on cleaning up and rectifying the illegal occupation of farmland by industrial and commercial capital and urban residents in rural areas to develop real estate and build housing in disguise.

The scope of clean-up and remediation mainly includes the following three types of problems:

1) Occupying cultivated land in various agricultural parks or directly building non-agricultural facilities on cultivated land in violation of laws and regulations, especially villas, leisure and vacation facilities, etc.

2) Illegally occupying cultivated land in agricultural greenhouses to build commercial residences.

3) The construction of agricultural greenhouse nursing houses seriously exceeds the standard, and even changes the nature and use of laws and regulations, and carries out residential business development.

Based on the results of the investigation, distinguish the types of violations of laws and regulations that are discovered, and rectify them in accordance with laws and regulations. Serious violations of laws and regulations such as occupying cultivated land in various agricultural parks or directly building houses and other non-agricultural facilities on cultivated land in violation of laws and regulations, as well as serious violations of laws and regulations such as illegally occupying cultivated land and building houses in agricultural greenhouses to change the nature and use of land, should be the focus of clean-up and rectification, resolutely crack down on them in accordance with laws and regulations, resolutely return the land to the land, and resume production; For agricultural greenhouses, nursing houses and other production ancillary facilities that occupy an area that exceeds the standard, it is necessary to distinguish the situation, do detailed work, and earnestly rectify it.

Legal basis: "Land Management Law of the People's Republic of China" 48th land requisition compensation and resettlement program is determined, the relevant local people should be announced, and listen to the opinions of the land-expropriated rural collective economic organizations and farmers.

That's right, since the end of last year, the renovation of greenhouses in various places has been carried out on a large scale. Will the demolition of the greenhouse affect the farmer's greenhouse? On the edge of the city or in the suburbs, we can find some vegetable greenhouses, or other fruit greenhouses, but some in order to make a profit, the cultivated land used to grow vegetables is used to build greenhouses, or build houses on the land as private land.

All localities vigorously renovate the "greenhouses", will the farmers' greenhouses be dismantled by the big coincidence? Let's talk about the demolition lawyer group in detail.

Rectifying the "big sheds" is conducive to safeguarding the land rights and interests of peasant friends.

The nation's vigorous efforts to rectify large sheds are beneficial to the peasants. The reason why the state wants to strictly investigate the "big sheds" in rural areas is that the land occupied by these illegal big sheds is the cultivated land that has been transferred from the peasants, and even the basic farmland. These acts have seriously harmed the interests of peasants and run counter to the original intention of the country's agricultural development.

If it is not dealt with in time, it will affect China's grain production in the future and will also have an impact on cultivated land.

After the rental and sale of large sheds to urban residents, farmers are also prone to losing their land, and even disputes arise over land ownership issues.

The big shed is not small to the land and the damage to the crops!

What is a "big shed"?

The problem of "greenhouses" refers to the illegal activities of industrial and commercial enterprises and individuals in some places who occupy cultivated land to build "private estates", villas, leisure and vacation facilities, commercial residences and other non-agricultural facilities in the name of building agricultural greenhouses. Its essence is to change the nature and use of land, change the function of agricultural production, touch the bottom line of "farmland surnamed farmers", and directly affect national food security.

What are the hazards of "big sheds"?

What is the danger of "big sheds"? Generally speaking, the hazards of "big sheds" are mainly the following three points:

1.The occupation of cultivated land and basic farmland has changed the nature of the land, destroyed the soil ecology, and hindered agricultural production.

2.The illegal resale of "big sheds" and the substitution of rents for sale have caused the peasants to lose their cultivated land, their livelihood is insecure, and their vital interests have been infringed upon.

3.Violating land management laws and regulations and endangering the safety of national grain production.

It is a good thing to want to start a business in the countryside, but it cannot harm the interests of farmers and the country, and the greenhouse is used to grow vegetables, and agricultural facilities are found, not used to develop real estate and other projects, so this kind of violation must be curbed.

The demolition of greenhouses should eliminate "one-size-fits-all" and affect the real greenhouses.

As I said earlier, the shed is illegal and should be demolished in accordance with the law. However, it is also necessary to pay attention to the particularity of the general problems, for example, the enterprises introduced by the local investment and investment should be reasonably compensated for the large sheds built with the permission of the local government.

Because these large sheds, as local projects, are in line with the principle of commercial trust and interests, they cannot be simply treated as illegal construction, and should be compensated according to the actual situation.