Reasons why cloning is bad, what are the good and bad things about cloning?

I don't think cloning is good.

First, blood reproduction constitutes the social structure and social relations. Why different countries and different races are almost against human cloning, the reason is that this is another mode of reproduction, and now the issue of child education in single-parent families has attracted much attention, that is, to pay attention to an emotional cultivation problem, human growth is completed in the state of sexual reproduction and parenting, and it has been like this for thousands of years, the emergence of cloned human beings, how should society deal with it, and what should be the relationship between cloned human beings and cloned human beings? Second, it is difficult to distinguish between identity and social rights.

What if one day suddenly 20 sons come to divide your property, and they all have the same fingerprints and genes? Do you have to engrave marks such as clone A0001 and clone A0002 on their foreheads like a car license plate photo to identify them? Thirdly, there is a point of view among those who support human cloning:

Solve the problem of infertility. But the next generation cloned by a person who is not of childbearing capacity will also be infertile. You think you are excellent, but the cloned person may have completely different personalities and behaviors except for the blood type, appearance, fingerprints, and genes that are the same as you, can you guarantee that the cloned person will be as good as you and will not go astray?

In human cloning research, if there is an anomaly, the defective clone cannot be disposed of at will like a cloned animal, which is also a problem. Therefore, in the current environment, not only the concept and system, but also the entire social structure does not know how to accept human cloning.

Blood procreation constitutes the social structure and social relations. Why different countries and different races are almost against human cloning, the reason is that this is another mode of reproduction, and now the issue of child education in single-parent families has attracted much attention, that is, to pay attention to an emotional cultivation problem, human growth is completed in the state of sexual reproduction and parenting, and it has been like this for thousands of years, the emergence of cloned human beings, how should society deal with it, and what should be the relationship between cloned human beings and cloned human beings? Second, it is difficult to distinguish between identity and social rights.

What if one day suddenly 20 sons come to divide your property, and they all have the same fingerprints and genes? Do you have to engrave marks such as Clone Chuan A0001 and Clone Chuan A0002 on their foreheads like a car listing photo to identify them? Thirdly, there is a point of view among those who support human cloning:

Solve the problem of infertility. But the next generation cloned by a person who is not of childbearing capacity will also be infertile. You think you are excellent, but the cloned person may have completely different personalities and behaviors except for the blood type, appearance, fingerprints, and genes that are the same as you, can you guarantee that the cloned person will be as good as you and will not go astray?

In human cloning research, if there is an anomaly, the defective clone cannot be disposed of at will like a cloned animal, which is also a problem. Therefore, in the current environment, not only the concept and system, but also the entire social structure does not know how to accept human cloning. ”

To put it simply: would you agree to have someone who looks exactly like you to divide up or even take away everything you have now? And human cloning is what makes that happening.

1 Ethics and Ethics, 2 Biological Evolution.

Disadvantage: May affect the natural composition and natural development of the human race. From a bioethical point of view, the destruction of people's right to unique genes may lead to the degradation of the human race, and will also shake the normal concept of life and death.

Clones can have psychological defects due to their special identity. For example, in the case of genetic engineering, from a bioethical point of view, the right of people to have unique genes is destroyed, which may lead to the degradation of the human race, and scientists lose their basic sense of belonging in order to allow bacteria and other microorganisms to "produce" expensive medicines.

From the point of view of sexual ethics, it completely changed the natural nature of human beings. The irreproducibility and irreplaceability of human personality regulations have lost their uniqueness due to a large number of reproductions, and the natural basis and biological premise of the self and its personality characteristics have been lost, which will exacerbate the tendency of family pluralism, disintegrate the normal human order, change people's kinship, and cultivate a large number of healthy new and endangered species protection.

Benefits: 1. Cloning technology and genetic breeding.

In agriculture, people have used the "cloning" technology to breed a large number of high-quality and high-yielding varieties that are resistant to drought, lodging, and diseases and pests, thus greatly increasing grain production. In this regard, China has entered the forefront of the world's most advanced technology.

2 Cloning technology and protection of endangered organisms.

Cloning or technology is a boon to the protection of species, especially rare and endangered species, and has great prospects for application and debate. From a biological point of view, this is also one of the most valuable aspects of cloning technology.

3 Cloning Technology and Medicine.

In modern times, doctors are able to perform transplant surgery on almost all human organs and tissues. But in terms of science and technology, rejection in organ transplantation is still the biggest headache. The cause of rejection is poor compatibility due to tissue mismatch.

If the organs of the "cloned" human are provided to the "original human" for organ transplantation, there is absolutely no fear of rejection, because the genes and tissues of the two are also compatible.

It is true that cloning technology may be as beneficial to humanity as atomic technology, but it can also be as harmful as nuclear technology. But the essence of "technological fear" is the fear of misusing technology, not the fear of technology in its own right.

Human beings are selfish and do everything to satisfy their physical and psychological needs. Human beings do not yet know why they are alive and what the meaning of life is. So, realistically, people are just thinking animals.

Animal behavior is still retained, and the monk is still in the initial development of thinking. Human society is progressing, and some ideas are abandoning.

Reproduction is a guarantee of the survival of a species, not a necessity for the survival of an individual. Human reproduction is a preserved animal behavior that can be discarded. Today, from contraception to the Dink family, sexless marriage is a development of those with advanced ideas who oppose reproductive practices.

But when it comes to the question of the survival of species, one of the solutions is to change sexual reproduction to asexual reproduction. In this way, the cloning of human beings will become a historical necessity. If, against human cloning, sexual reproduction is in favour, then some vague reasons must be found; If there were to be a justification for opposing both human cloning and sexual reproduction, that would not be credible.

When it comes to ethical and dignity issues, it's easy to think of orphans and abandoned babies. Some of them don't have or don't know who their parents are, like clones in science fiction. What ethics do you have to impose?

So there is no dignity left?

What is the crisis of human cloning? Some believe that human clones could become slaves, or they could surpass or even dominate humans. Why do you think so?

This is because the people of this view themselves have a serious class mentality and hostile thoughts. The crux of the matter seems to be emerging. Is it the human mind that is at fault?

Why, then, should we first allow the development of medical cloning, and at the same time purify the mind and provide fertile ground for human cloning.

If all goes well, a society will emerge in which human beings will no longer engage in sexual reproduction, but will "produce" human clones in fixed locations, to be raised by professionals. As a result, humans may evolve into asexuality, and relationships between people are more harmonious.

When an adult hears a child say, "Where did I come from?" "It might be as embarrassing as an adult today.

But eventually people will come to a consensus and accept the way cloned are born, just as they accept today that they were born to their parents.

At that time, there will be no kinship ethic, and everyone will be truly an individual, without class, without discrimination, without hatred. People really come together to survive and thrive together.