Canon EF60mm 2 8 Macro How to distinguish parallel goods

Licensed goods are officially sold in Chinese mainland, and parallel goods refer to those that have not taken tariffs, that is, smuggled, and the quality is the same, and there is no difference.

It's basically no problem to buy parallel goods for the lens, but the so-called warranty of the general merchant can't do it for one year, because the profit is too low, and some of the head line water is even only 180 yuan, and the lens itself is not too expensive, so the difference between the line of water is small, if you don't care about such a little bit of buying line, you can buy a rest assured.

24-70 This kind of head can buy water, L head can generally be used for at least ten or twenty years, I have done so many years of photography, rarely see normal use damage.

Due to Japan's export strategy, the quality of parallel goods is better than that of licensed goods, so it is recommended to buy water; Because this lens is too unpopular, it is rarely repaired and refurbished, and buying parallel goods is real parallel goods;

24-70 It is recommended to buy the line because the cheapness is too small, less than 10%, there is no need to take risks.

For example, I bought a 24-70 from the auxiliary factory, 6500 for licensed goods, and 5100 for parallel goods, so I bought the water, as for whether it was a tragedy to buy a repair and refurbishment, anyway, the lens is used normally, there is nothing wrong with the imaging is the same as the online sample, so I don't care;

The difference is big to buy water, not big to buy the line.

There is no essential difference in quality, and the main difference is that parallel goods are not guaranteed in China.

The quality of the Canon EF 50mm lens is the same as that of a licensed product. The difference between parallel goods and licensed goods: the parallel goods are not issued by the seller with formal insurance policies and invoices, and the seller does not bear the warranty, and the benefit of this is the warranty fee contracted by the merchant to the seller, and the seller directly gives it to the buyer.

Ruthless sellers can make a little money from it, and sellers can also earn the difference between wholesale and retail, and evade taxes without official invoices. Licensed goods are in accordance with the formal law, the merchant contracts the warranty fee to the seller, the seller collects, does not have a problem belongs to the seller, the seller can also earn the difference between wholesale and retail, but the official invoice is issued, and the tax is taken by the national and local taxes. I have used no less than 50 parallel Canon products for more than 20 years, and there have been no quality problems.

Just looking at the lens is not able to divide the water (unless you remember the number on the lens, go to Canon to check the factory batch of the lens, and it is possible to see whether it is line or water when the shipment is sent there) 50 ** is between 700-800, there is no need to go to the branch and water at all...

Friend, it doesn't matter if this head is a licensed parallel import, it's just a few hundred dollars, and the imaging effect is acceptable, after all, it's a prime lens! I think it's okay to buy pure parallel goods directly Licensed goods are a little more expensive (in fact, it's not much, it's only about 700 in total), this lens is not easy to break, it's quite solid Don't worry, as long as you don't buy a refurbished one, hehe.

In addition to macro and aperture, there are 24-70 f4 with image stabilization, which is more portable and cheaper.

In addition to the above statement, there is also a better picture quality.

It's not so compared, the second generation 24-70 also has Yes, compared to the previous generation, it seems to have added a super UD lens.

Licensed national joint insurance, parallel store insurance.

Licensed goods are more expensive than parallel goods, and the specific amount of money depends on the model.

Genuine parallel goods are of the same quality as licensed goods, and I am afraid of buying refurbished goods.

50 is a little bit better than 50 resolution. The main difference is that the 50 color is more comfortable than the 50, and the bokeh looks a little more pretty. There is also a much better workmanship than the 50, there is an ultrasonic motor, and the lenses are at least glass.

If you expect to spend three or four times more ** to get more than 50% better images, then there is no need, if you don't mind spending a little more money for a better feel and about 10% resolution and unquantifiable color and bokeh, of course 50 is better.

The difference is not very big, mainly because the 50 is slightly prettier at the out-of-focus.

The workmanship of the lens is different, and the out-of-focus will be different, and it seems that the 50 focus is worse.

The second-generation mount was changed from metal to plastic in the first-generation bayonet, and the focus distance display window was removed.

The imaging of the 2nd generation is slightly better than that of the 1st generation, and the workmanship is worse than that of the 1st generation.

50 out of the second generation is just a rumor, canon seems to be going to release a single-lens reflex product in September, but I don't know yet.

In fact, even if the second generation is released, it doesn't feel like it makes much sense 50's imaging is good enough, and there is no weak brigade in the header, even if the second generation is released, it will improve the mechanical properties at most, and the imaging improvement may not be much, otherwise 50 Who will sell it.

The focus of the second generation is rougher than that of the first generation, and the appearance is also rough, but the imaging has been improved.

Macro is achieved through optics, and digital macro is achieved through digital processing, and digital zoom is not as good as optics.

Macro is optical, while digital macro is achieved by digital sacrifice pixels.

First of all, the macro lens does not have an effect when shooting portraits, so at the same focal length, there is a macro head, and there is also a portrait 60 that is suitable. You can try framing with the zoom head in your hand. The workmanship of Xinbaiwei is still much better than that of 60micro, after all.

This head has a magnification of only , which is not suitable for macro lenses.

The macro lens can be selected from 60 micro or 100 micro. If you're just playing occasionally, you can also consider getting a close-up lens.

No, the wide-angle macro is not reliable.

If you don't consider upgrading, buy macro, mainly depends on whether you shoot dynamic or static, indoor or outdoor, 50 basically don't need to consider, 60 is suitable for static (especially suitable for open **), Baiwei is not suitable for indoor use, because the focal length is long, it is difficult to perform indoors, Baiwei is only suitable for outdoor.

If you think about upgrading, it's 100 micro

It is recommended that Baiwei, with many uses, imaging ***, and charming out-of-focus, this lens is very excellent regardless of the first generation of products, and has a good reputation.

The minimum focusing distance of 50 micrometers and 60 micrometers is relatively short, so it is possible to touch the subject to get the best image, and the macro capability of 50 micrometers is not 1:1, so it is not recommended. There is no weak brigade in fixed focus, and the image quality is not bad.

If you have funds, you will directly circle in red, saving you the loss of funds and energy.

If you want to change the full frame in the future, buy Baiwei, if you don't change it, go to 60In the long run, it's better to be 100 micro, multi-purpose, imaging quality is very good in all aspects, not only can you shoot macro, you can also take portraits, although the second generation ** is a bit high, you can consider a generation, after all, you have to shoot macro on the shelf, it doesn't matter if you have anti-shake or not, but if you have money, the second generation, after all, it is a red circle head, and the optimized one must be better than the first generation, if it is a half-frame camera, it will be on 60, This lens is specially designed for half-frame macro lens imaging or something, I don't have to say that the picture with the half-frame body is definitely good,**Relatively Baiwei is also a lot cheaper,It's up to you.。