Which Canon 70 200mm lens is more cost effective??? Ask for an answer!! Send high scores!!!! Urgent!

Generally speaking, if you are considering upgrading to full-frame, choose a large three-dimensional -200 red circle zoom lens with a sufficient budget, and 70 200 Xiaobai should be stabilized, preferably the second generation.

If you have a small budget, consider choosing a -200 (anti-shake) red circle zoom lens with three 4s.

I think the EFS lens is a bit more suitable if you choose a 60D or 7D body, because this type of lens from Canon is optimized for non-full-frame cameras. If you choose a full-frame body, it may be better to consider a 24-70 IS lens.

If you want to listen to me, don't toss around.,I'd rather not have it than make do.,Use the most classic,16-35,24-70,XBIS2,As for 50, I'm not very optimistic.,It's not as good as the last t*50 It's not as good as the last t*50 It's about 4500 imaging of Canon's mouth.,I can only say that it's easy to use.,The principle is not capable of analysis.,We're not professional designers.,Just users.,Remind me,F 4's lens is not just a small aperture point.,The most terrible thing is that the light transmission is insufficient.,The focusing speed is slow.,The level of detail is thin,

These three ** are too different and not easy to compare! But I think it's okay to go straight to IS! At least not to regret it later! I see that many friends think that they are getting started, and they buy everything cost-effective, but in the end, they are bought after the low price is processed and the ticket is made!

The Canon 70 200 has four models, sorted by good and bad at the same time by **:

1, with anti-shake, Chinese nickname: love to death Xiaobai.

2, with anti-shake, Chinese nickname: love to death Xiaoxiaobai.

3, without anti-shake, Chinese nickname: Xiaobai.

4, without anti-shake, Chinese nickname: Xiaoxiaobai.

Good or bad refers to the overall quality of the lens, and their difference is not only the difference between the maximum aperture and the difference with or without image stabilization shown above, but also the difference in imaging, sharpness, etc.

If you want to say that it is good, it must be the best to love Xiaobai, there are three obvious characteristics: 1 good, 2 expensive, 3 heavy, it is the best lens in this focal length Canon zoom (there is no one), so**It has always been strong, and the second-hand with good condition can be sold for more than 10,002. This head is equipped with a Canon full-frame body, which has the most stylish, bright, and eye-catching appearance, which is a must-have for pretending to be a professional wedding dress location shooting.

At the same time, because it is so valuable, it is generally enough to love Xiaobai who loves death mainly and scenery, including some professional landscape photographers, because love Xiaobai is too heavy and heavy, and there are many people who love Xiaobai again. In fact, real professional portraits also use small apertures as much, but novices like to blur the background, including models also like you to shoot with the maximum aperture, the depth of field is small, and it seems that her ** is good.

1.The lens material is not the same.

The Canon EF70-300 has two UD ultra-low dispersion lenses with 19 elements in 14 groups. Canon EF70-300 has only 1 UD tablet, 15 elements in 10 groups;

2.The lens workmanship is different.

The Canon EF70-300 has been optimized for coating to suppress glare and ghosting for a good color balance. The front lens group is made of oil-proof, waterproof and anti-fouling fluorine coating, which makes it difficult for dirt to adhere to it.

3.The optical quality is not the same.

The Canon EF70-300mmF lens uses two UD ultra-low dispersion elements to compensate for chromatic aberration similar to that of a single fluorite glass. The Canon EF70-300mmF lens provides color stability throughout the zoom range, but autofocus in low-light environments has a "bellows" phenomenon.

I don't recommend buying an analogue, which is often out of focus.

The color reproduction of the sub-factory lens is not as good as that of the original factory.

There are many ** shots from the sub-factory lens that have color casts (not white balance problems).

The value of the sub-factory lens does not retain (for example, if you buy back 5,000 yuan, when you want to buy it, you can often only buy about 3,000).

As for the above three lenses that the landlord said, I have used two of them, which are 70 200f4is and 70 of 1For telephoto, the performance of image stabilization is very important, because a telephoto shake (even a small vibration will have a relatively large impact) is likely to be infocused, blurry, etc.

2.If the landlord uses a tripod + shutter line, you can make up for this problem, but it's too troublesome, if you have a close-up on the stage, move the tripod to compose the picture, and then lock the shelf, the opportunity is often lost, of course, if the landlord has the ability to have this confidence, then there is no problem.

And 70 image quality, even if all the parameters are the same, the image quality is also very different, 27 200 seckill 70 200f4 You have to know that the difference between these two lenses is more than double, and you get what you pay for.

4.The amount of light entering the aperture is twice as large as each gear, and the stage lights are usually dim, even if the stage is brighter, but this is the feeling of the naked eye, and the camera sensor is not like that, so it is a completely different grade from F4, and the aperture is fully capable of the stage lighting.

1. If it is a tripod + shutter release cable, there is no need for lens stabilization, and the tripod is much more effective than IS;

2. F4 is also set to shoot the same picture, and the direct ** is generally not visible, if it is to be used**, it has to go through image processing, and it is impossible to compare;

3. Now the body ISO can be very high, and it is no problem to shoot close-ups under general stage lighting conditions, but the shutter of 125 is not enough to shoot stage performances in many cases, and it may be okay to look at the small picture, but it will not work when it is enlarged, and the shutter must be determined according to the actual situation;

4. If you can use the original factory, don't use the auxiliary factory.

Really pragmatic, we have to think more about these questions:

1. If you just shoot children's stage performances, how many times a year can you use them? Is it worth buying whiteheads just for this?

2. According to the conditions of your child's performance venue and the height of the stage, can you be allowed to set up a camera tripod? Is the tripod high enough? Is 70-200 focal length enough?

Canon's 4 70-200 has always been a lot of people tangled. From a practical point of view, the 70-200F4 IS is the most suitable for amateur use, and no one can guarantee that you will be able to use a tripod every time you use a telephoto, and the IS is still very useful. As for whether IS's ** is worth it or not, it depends on everyone's attitude and economic conditions towards their own **.

Many times, in amateur conditions, I shoot such stage themes with a low-end fuselage, and I don't do a lot of paper output, and there is no difference between 70-200 and 55-250. Focus more on white balance control and capture techniques, and use high-speed continuous shooting. Multi-RAW shooting makes it easy to adjust the white balance accurately at high image quality.

Unless you have a high-end DSLR, people on stage sometimes move quickly, so pay attention to the camera's focus tracking performance. In addition, most of the Canon's fuselage is fast for high-speed continuous shooting, but the number of shots to maintain high speed is not much, so you should pay attention to this when using it, especially when shooting in RAW continuous shooting.

See what you're using to shoot. Xiaobai is generally used to shoot portraits, and this situation is rarely on a tripod, which is troublesome.

The difference is not only in aperture and image stabilization, but also in the image quality of the lens. If you have enough budget, don't think about it, chicken ribs.

Don't think about Sigma Tenron, the image quality is much worse than Xiaobai (chromatic dispersion, edge sharpness, color, focusing speed, etc.), and the transparency is not the same (low transparency is equivalent to less light intake, which will increase the shutter speed, ISO limit), plus the problem of value preservation (Xiaobai will still be Xiaobai after two years of selling, and the deputy factory will lose all its money if it is sold in two years), chicken ribs.

Finally, for Xiaobai and Xiaobai, the difference in picture quality is not too big, and the only thing to consider is stabilization. If you're shooting outdoors during the day, you don't need stabilization. However, stabilization is still useful indoors or in low-light situations.

Choose between these two according to your actual usage scenario and frequency.

If I mainly shoot stage photos, I think I can do without anti-shake, and the aperture is at least. The reason is that everyone on the stage is moving, and if the shutter speed is low, even if it doesn't shake, it can't be shot. Therefore, it is more secure to open the shutter speed above ISO+1 500.

In addition, in addition to Xiaobai, you can consider Canon's 135mm beauty head), which is more than 5600 yuan, the picture quality is on the same level as Xiaobaiis, and the aperture is one step larger, which is conducive to further improving the shutter speed. Of course, the disadvantage is that this is a fixed focal head, and it requires a certain amount of technology to control it, and there are also certain restrictions on the shooting location, which requires editing and shooting while running the position. (This is the most recommended person to shoot the stage).

70-200, Canon has five versions:

Xiaoxiaobai, that is, the aperture f4, without anti-shake;

Love to die Xiaoxiaobai, aperture F4, with image stabilization;

White, aperture, without stabilization;

Love to death Xiaobai, with an anti-shake generation, this new one on the market has been taken off the shelves. Love to death little white rabbit, with anti-shake, second generation.

The original factory can consider loving Xiaoxiaobai, more than 8,000.

The Tamron SP 70-200MM F DI VC USD is also good, much cheaper. All you have to do is buy a Canon mouthpiece.

The dish with is stabilized, so only the last one of the 3 in your column is stabilized.

Anti-shake and wide aperture are mainly used to deal with poor lighting environments, and the stage is typical and best used. Of course, the tripod must be used, with or without anti-shake.

There is a difference between the three heads in the same fuselage and the same parameter f is equal to 4, but it depends on the way and use of **, and there is no difference between placing it in a certain space and so on.

Tamron SP 70-200mm F DI VC USD can be considered, no problem for home use, imaging can.

Tamron SP 70-200mm F DI VC USD is very good image quality, definitely not losing the love of the white rabbit, the two Sigma I tried friends, the large aperture imaging is very poor.

Don't think about the vice-factory, the quality of 2 hands is unreliable, and the depreciation of buying new ones is fast. Love to die Xiaobai, love to die Xiaobai 2, ** high, think about it clearly, is it worth it to make so much money?

I think I can consider 2 hands of Xiaoxiaobai, **3-4 thousand, original, l professional lens, constant aperture f4, inner focus, inner zoom (the lens will not be telescopic, the whole is sealed, and will not enter the dust). Lightweight, there is no significant difference in imaging quality and love to die. Superior mechanical properties and excellent quality.

If you use it for a period of time and then change it, it will be easy to get out and you won't lose much money. Of course, buy 2 to have an extra eye on hand, wait for the opportunity slowly, and don't rush it.

Then choose Xiaoxiaobai, about 4000 yuan, with a piece of fluorite and two pieces of ud, the picture quality is not said, not much worse than the love of the white rabbit or Xiaobai, at least 99% of people can't distinguish it... In addition, as long as the shutter speed is guaranteed for normal people shooting, such as Xiaoxiaobai's 200 end to ensure a shutter speed of more than 1 250, the output rate is still very high...

Finally, if you think the tripod is troublesome, then choose a monopod of about 200 yuan, which is easy to carry, easy to use, and it is very convenient to take pictures of the stage, capture, and snap shots, and it can be equivalent to 4-6 levels of anti-shake effect after proficiency, and the advanced monopod of more than 1,000 yuan itself also has a tripod function, and Futubao has a tripod of about 600 yuan, which can be disassembled into a monopod

In terms of focal length, 70-300 has a wider range than 70-200, which is more convenient.

However, from the perspective of the manufacturing process and imaging of optical lenses, the 70-200 manufacturing process is less than the imaging quality required by the 70-300. Generally speaking, the optical zoom of a good good lens is generally no more than 3x. After more than 3x, it is not possible to balance the wide focal length and image quality.

Either that's a wide focal length, but at the expense of quality. Either the focal length range is sacrificed, so from the manufacturing level, 3x is more appropriate. This also explains why it is said that the tour head is convenient, but the quality is poorer.

Therefore, the 70-200 uses more expensive materials and processes, large aperture design, etc., which increases the manufacturing cost to ensure image quality and performance. So it's relatively better.

Generally speaking, the imaging of the same lens with small zoom is better than that of large zoom, because the small zoom structure is simpler, so the imaging quality is easier to do. Remember to be the same ** premise.

The smaller the range, the better, not that the product has high technical content, nor that the price is expensive, but that the imaging effect is good. Of course, the best is the prime head.

70-200 is a constant wide aperture. 70-300 is the aperture head. Not at all on the same level! The number of ED tablets is also different, and the difference is very large!