Why is beauty, as a dominant gene, not spreading among the population?

First of all, there is no clear standard and definition of beauty, and to put it bluntly, the beauty in your eyes may not be beautiful in my eyes. The most obvious thing is that Easterners do not see the beauty of Westerners in the same way as Westerners see their own standards of beauty. In the same way, beauty in our eyes may not be beauty in the eyes of Westerners, so how can we judge beauty?

It can only be said that beauty is more of a product of subjective consciousness, beauty is not a dominant gene, in the eyes of nature, I don't care about beauty and ugliness at all, nature only cares about whether you can better adapt to the environment, what can adapt to the environment is the dominant gene, and what cannot adapt is not the dominant gene! And isn't there a clear standard for beauty, and even if there is, can beauty make it better adapted to the environment? Some say yes, because most people prefer to deal with good-looking people, which is the narrowness of the standard, the selection of nature by human standards.

Adapting to the environment is not based on human perception, but nature, beauty will not make you survive better in nature, so nature will not care if beauty can continue! <>

To put it bluntly, beauty is an external thing, and the dominant gene is the internal and external manifestations of people, beauty does not allow you to adapt to the changes in the environment, so that you can adapt to the environment more. Using a dialectical way of thinking in philosophy, the premise of the existence of so-called beauty is that there must be ugliness, and if there is no ugliness, where can there be beauty? If all human beings are beautiful, there will be no beauty, and beauty needs ugliness to stand out!

Therefore, we should not think about this kind of problem from the perspective of human beings, but need to think from the height of nature now. The most obvious example is that on a desert island, whether you survive or not has nothing to do with beauty!

Because we want to understand the truth of "the difference between beauty and ugliness".

Because this advantage cannot be used as a criterion for judging a person.

Beauty is an external thing, and the dominant gene is the internal and external manifestations of people, beauty does not allow you to adapt to the changes in the environment, so that you can adapt to the environment more.

If beauty is the dominant gene, when choosing to mate, the other person with such a gene will be preferred.

This is one of the more difficult questions in evolutionary biology.

The daughter of a big beauty will "degenerate", the reason is very simple, a top beauty, her beauty gene can be called "perfect", not a combination of beautiful women and handsome guys will definitely give birth to a big beauty, the daughter of the beauty offspring must not be as beautiful as the mother, but the son may be very handsome!

If there is no mutation, there is no evolution. This is one of the explanations.

Because the people who have the advantage of beauty are only a small minority.

This can't be changed, natural evolution is like that.

Because this advantage can only be predetermined, and this advantage is not very important.

Because this advantage is relatively random, it cannot be looked at from this aspect.

When it comes to beauty, we all think of beautiful women, and beauty often refers not only to beautiful women but also to beautiful men. It would be an enviable thing if we could have a beautiful look. Then there are not many beautiful women and beautiful men around us who usually live, so beauty can be used as a dominant gene.

1. Beauty can be inherited. Beautiful looks can be inherited. We often see that the parents of the more beautiful classmates are also more beautiful or handsome, which is heredity, and it is a kind of inheritance with genes.

Because there are not many beautiful people around us, most of them have a relatively ordinary appearance. Compared with ordinary people, these beautiful people are the existence of a dominant gene.

2. Beauty helps you find a better partner. 3. Beauty can add points to work. Beauty not only helps us find a better partner, but it also adds points to our work.

For example, in the daily recruitment requirements for job hunting, we can see the same conditions, and the recruiter is more inclined to candidates with better appearance and temperament. When we are interviewing, beauty will also add points to our interview. Because beautiful looks often determine the first impression we make, beautiful people always give a good impression.

Moreover, when the employer recruits candidates with beauty advantages, it is more likely to consider that beauty can add aura to the job and improve the image of the unit. From this point of view, beauty is the existence of a dominant gene.

OK. Because the child's appearance will inherit the appearance of the parents, a good-looking person has many advantages in society.

OK. If a person is particularly beautiful, he may get a lot of opportunities in life, and there will be many outlets.

Beauty can be used as a dominant gene. Because a person's beauty is the most striking characteristic of a person.

Yes, appearance is very important, when your appearance is very high, you can leave a good impression on others.

Because God treats everyone fairly, you can't take everything, and if you have it, you lose that, and this is the fairness of the world.

Because it still depends on the foundation of both parents, if both parents are not very good-looking, the child will not inherit the beautiful gene.

This is because there is a small probability that this gene has not spread, and not everyone will be able to get it.

Because it is not a key gene that determines people's survival, it naturally does not carry out survival of the fittest, and beauty is only a broad word, and there is no strict dividing line.

Because beautiful people will be with beautiful people, it will spread slowly, and there is a probability that a gene is too inherited, not that the children born in your beautiful life will be beautiful.

Because there are not many people with beauty, everyone's vision is different, and everyone's definition of beauty is different.

Because everyone's genes are different, and secondly, because of genetic problems, it will lead to such a situation and cause such an impact.

This is because beauty is related to genes and genetic factors, so there is no guarantee of diffusion.

I don't think there's a difference in beauty between people: it's just that everyone's aesthetic views are different. Don't know what beauty is?

It's just that it's everyone's life"Body Face shape"Image. For example, if I think someone is not beautiful, but the other person thinks is beautiful, it is a matter of a person's aesthetics to see whether everyone is beautiful or not.

In human evolution, beauty has never been a dominant gene. Being able to survive better is the dominant gene. Therefore, the criteria for judging beauty in different periods are completely different.

It's like, when human technology was not yet developed, lions, tigers, and leopards were never symbols of beauty, but of courage and intimidation. Even now. I don't know why I came to you and became beautiful.

And bright colors, many in the wild, also represent a signal of poison and danger, and are also not beautiful. It is only because humans have evolved to the apex of the food chain that there is a redefinition of beauty.

Because the level of human appearance is actually stronger from generation to generation. You think that most of them are very average, and that's because you are a modern person and already have the aesthetics of a modern person. If you travel back in time from ancient times, you will feel that there are handsome guys and beautiful women everywhere.

Beauty is only for the sake of pleasing and seducing others. It is not a good quality or a great spirit, it is dispensable. In essence, looks are just independent symbols that distinguish each other, and unifying "beauty" is a disaster.

Because we can't quickly distinguish each other from each other.

Let me tell you the simplest truth. At any time, in any world, the elite will always be the least. The percentage is very low, very low.

First, because there is no objective standard for beauty, some people like to be small and exquisite, and some people like to make up the atmosphere. Each is beautiful. The second is to spread beauty as a gene, all of them are so beautiful, and everything else is meaningless.

Beauty and ugliness exist in comparison. Third, if one type of beauty is used, the theory of racial superiority will be formed, which is not conducive to the blossoming of a hundred ethnic races and the development of human civilization.

Because each person's inheritance of their parents' genes is limited, and they are all different, although it is a dominant gene, it has not spread.

Because beauty is not a gene, and it is made up of many genes, it does not spread.

Of course, beautiful parents have more opportunities to pass on these genes to their children. However, there are differences in the genetic process, and according to scientific research, the beauty of parents will be passed on to their daughters more and less likely to be passed on to their sons. It turns out that this is also the case, celebrity parents are like firstborn daughters, and they are generally very beautiful.

It should be determined by the intrinsic needs of human reproduction and continuity. As a mother, a daughter is bound to be favored by more members of the opposite sex while gaining beauty. As a man, the son needs to be more masculine and capable in order to survive.

Furthermore, although the differences between the various animals in nature are small in the eyes of us humans, the differences in the senses of their animals are very large. And the human being in the eyes of animals is the same as the animals in the eyes of humans.

Beauty is more of a subjective consciousness product, beauty is not a dominant gene, in the eyes of nature, I don't care about what beauty and ugliness, nature only cares about whether you can better adapt to the environment, can adapt to the environment is the dominant gene, can not adapt to the dominant gene!

The so-called dominant gene is the "conceptual source of advantageous expressiveness", which is usually hidden in the "two major elements" of public relations relations. Genetic testing is divided into two parts, one is "genetic testing, advantage potential assessment", that is, through genetic testing, to find the child's innate advantages; The other is "genetic testing, disease susceptibility analysis", that is, through genetic testing, find the genes that are easy to be infected with a certain disease in their own genes, so that they can be avoided and prevented in the acquired life, and the occurrence of diseases can be prevented in a real sense.

This is a problem of genes, good-looking people may not necessarily marry and have children with good-looking people, then there are two possibilities for their genes, one is good-looking, and the other is ordinary. It's hard to say that this is absolute.

That's because beauty only exists among individual groups and is not universally distributed among all people.

Because beauty does not belong to a person, when beauty becomes universal, there will be an oversupply, and aesthetic fatigue will occur, and the external beauty of appearance is not the only criterion for judging at present, but people do not seem to be the only criterion, the inner temperament beauty, in turn, can set off the external beauty. Beauty is linked to the inside and the outside, and only the outside is beautiful, and no inner beauty is not true beauty.

Let's put it this way, there are so many ugly ones, you can't help but reproduce offspring, and plastic surgery can't be inherited.

It's related to genetics, and there are ugly people in the world.

Because people have different definitions of beauty.

Because not everyone can be beautiful.

Because this really requires an innate advantage.

Different people have different definitions of what it looks like, so there are different people.

That's because the combination of the two isn't necessarily good.

There is no fixed definition of this, and everyone has different opinions.