Who is stronger Federer or Nadal, and which is better Nadal or Federer

Like the old Jordan and Kobe Bryant in his prime. These things have to be compared comprehensively, Federer's current state and physical strength are definitely not as good as Nadal, Nadal is now at his peak, and Federer is considered late in his career. Personally, I think that in terms of historical status, Federer is higher than Nadal, after all, 16 GS, four and a half years of world No. 1 represents an era (Nadal does not seem to have completely belonged to his own era).

At present, Nadal has the upper hand in comparison. They also have different styles of play, Federer is attacking, he can be called one of the best on any field, he is flashy in attack and full of imagination in his shots. Nadal can play a very clingy defense with his physical attributes, so he is the absolute number one on clay (the speed of the ball on clay is slow, which helps him to play to his speed advantage).

So, I think there will come a day when they all retire. It should be Federer's historical status higher than Nadal's. It is estimated that Nadal has a short sports lifespan, and a person of his type will either not get injured, and if he gets injured, then he is likely to lose his competitiveness.

Nadal is the king of clay, and Federer is the all-round king. Without Nadal, Federer could have won the French Open. But without Federer, Nadal would still only be able to win one Australian Open, two Wimbledon and one US Open title.

Nadal's main advantage is that he can beat Federer at the French Open, who is four years younger than Federer, which is the main reason why Nadal is now in better form than Federer. There is another important reason why Nadal has the advantage in the battle with Federer: that is, in Federer's prime, Nadal could not get past the previous hurdle in the game outside of clay, and there was no chance to play Federer at all.

If they had played Federer back then, their record would definitely not be what it is now! Federer is old, and his record against Nadal is unlikely to get better, and it could get worse. However, Federer's record, outside of clay, Nadal cannot be surpassed.

Overall, Federer is stronger, and Nadal is stronger now.

This has to be divided into venues, after all, it is good at different directions:

1. There is no suspense on red soil, after all, Nadal is known as the king of red clay, and red clay is the venue he is best at.

2. On hard courts, Federer has the advantage, after all, he has won 12 Grand Slams in five years.

3. On grass, Federer and Nadal are five or five, Federer has a slight advantage in technology, but Nadal is young and dares to fight.

Roger Federer:

Born on August 8, 1981 in Basel, Switzerland, a Swiss professional tennis player, Roger Federer has many titles such as "Swiss Express" and "Cow", and is considered one of the greatest athletes of all time. From February 2004 to August 2008, Federer held the record for the longest consecutive singles number one week in ATP history (237 weeks).

Rafael Nadal :

Born on June 3, 1986 in Mallorca, Spain, is a Spanish professional tennis player, one of the three Grand Slam winners among active male players, and one of the two Golden Slam winners among male players in history.

It depends on who you like more, which one you like more, which one is more powerful.