I take the trouble to recommend a few Pentax and Nikon SLRs that are cost effective

The advantage of Canon is that in terms of color reproduction, Pentax's color is relatively jumpy, Nikon's contact is less, and the color is colder, and if you get started, it's better to choose some low-end entry-level SLR For a novice, the effect of low-end and high-end machines is about the same in his hands.

If the entry-level machine is not recommended for Nikon, the low-end Nikon has a lot less maneuverability.

If you don't have any post-production, I recommend Pentax. Because the color is really beautiful, you don't have to do anything to deal with it, Pentax K-R is recommended

If you want to have a little bit of your own style for **, then Canon's, you need to deal with it yourself in the later stage.

Bokeh is not looking at the camera, it is looking at the lens, and a large aperture is enough.

You can go to the hummingbird forum. There's a lot to learn.

The Pentax KX and Canon 500D are entry-level and Nikon's D3000 as well.

KR is not a revolutionary upgrade compared to KX, and the fuselage is not as good as KX, so it is not recommended.

In terms of lenses, Canon and Nikon have a lot of lenses.

Let's put it this way. Shots under 300 are a complete victory.

But in the 500-2000 Pender, Canon and Nikon are very advantageous, and the 3000-8000 lens Pentax is very good.

I bought it myself and kx and thought it was beautiful... ")

In the case of portraits, it is recommended to enter the C house, and Nikon's camera is suitable for shooting landscapes, macros, and the like.

Pentax's KX series is also available, but there seem to be only 2 joint insurance points in the country, but the cost performance is very high!

Pentax originally did not have many models, and the KX, which is about to be withdrawn, is more cost-effective.

Nikon,From the perspective of cost performance alone, I don't consider **affordability,D700The most cost-effective,It's comparable to D3Image quality,We can't use higher continuous shooting speed,**Cheaper by half。

The entry-level D3100 is also one, and the performance improvement is too significant compared to the D3000, even exceeding the D5000, but it is about the same, and it is enough for ordinary people.

The D90 set of machines that are about to be withdrawn from the market is also worth buying, 7000 yuan level, the function is not outdated so far, it is very convenient to use Nikon's old-fashioned AF lens, and it belongs to the ivy of the mid-range machine.

Nikon D3100 (very cost-effective) In the expensive point, you can consider D90

Pentax's KR is good, but if the budget is 7000, then it's still K7 directly, K7 is already the most advanced SLR in Pentax's APS-C series.

Secondly, add a few SLR misunderstandings: 1The lens of a DSLR has a much greater impact on imaging than the body. If you have a limited budget, the correct way is to go into a general body and buy a good lens. (The body is more important than the lens, which is a misunderstanding of many beginners).

2.You said that the blur should be good-looking, but what does it mean to be good-looking? The effect of bokeh has a lot to do with the lens, and the above are all sets**, and the bokeh of these machines is no problem, but if the bokeh effect is really good, it is still difficult to set the head.

Finally, if you really want to play SLR, and you focus on portraits, you might as well buy a single body and add a fixed focal head, which will work very well. In addition, the use of the prime head is not very convenient for beginners, but it can be used correctly and skillfully, which is very helpful for improving the foundation of photography.

Pentax K30 set, the cheapest.

Depending on your budget, depending on the money, Pentax currently has half-frame and medium-format machines, and full-frame seems to be gone.

If you pursue cost performance, you should not play SLR. SLR is a complete set of system engineering, and there are a lot of follow-ups, just play a set, and there is no need to start with SLR.

The so-called cost performance is relative, depending on the use habits and lens matching. Relatively speaking, at the same price, Pentax has a cost-effective advantage.

1) The full-frame K1 image quality and operability are still good at the same price.

2) K3II, which can still be compared to Canon's new 80D.

3) Among the entry-level models, KS2 is not the most popular, with 18 135WR, it is still one of the best choices to start shooting.

Because among the DSLRs with the same versatility, Pentax ** is the lowest.