Ask for legal help!! About Divorce!! Urgent

According to the provisions of the Marriage Act, pre-marital property belongs to each other.

Therefore, the house purchased by the husband before the marriage belongs to the husband at the time of divorce.

However, it should be noted that Article 39 of the Marriage Law stipulates that in the event of divorce, the joint property of the husband and wife shall be disposed of by mutual agreement; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment based on the specific circumstances of the property and the principle of taking care of the rights and interests of the children and the woman.

At the same time, it should be noted that the husband and wife may agree to divide the property before and after marriage, and if the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment in accordance with the above principles.

There is a right, unless you can find her fault (referring to the fault that caused the divorce).

She doesn't have a job, but you're a husband and wife. Generally speaking, the joint property of the husband and wife should be divided equally, so your savings and so on must be divided, not that she can't ask for it when you go to work, but the house is something you have before marriage, so you don't need to divide it if it is not considered joint property.

If the husband's property was purchased before the marriage, it is his personal property and cannot be divided in the event of divorce. In addition, according to the current legal provisions, in the event of a divorce, the man does not have to pay maintenance to the woman. If there is other common property, it may be divided appropriately.

1. The property belongs to your parents, and you have no right to divide it. The following conditions must be met for divorce: Article 32: Where a man or a woman requests a divorce, the relevant departments may conduct mediation or directly file a divorce lawsuit with the people's court.

People's courts hearing divorce cases shall conduct mediation; If the relationship has indeed broken down and mediation fails, the divorce should be granted.

In any of the following circumstances, if mediation fails, a divorce shall be granted:

1) bigamy or cohabitation of a person with a spouse;

2) Committing domestic violence or abusing or abandoning family members;

3) Those who have bad habits such as gambling and drug abuse that they do not change;

4) Separated for two years due to emotional discord;

5) Other circumstances that lead to the breakdown of the relationship between husband and wife.

If one party is declared missing and the other party initiates divorce proceedings, the divorce shall be granted.

2. The following conditions must be met when applying for compensation at the time of divorce.

Article 46: In any of the following circumstances, where a divorce is caused, the party who is not at fault has the right to claim damages:

1) bigamy;

2) A person who has a spouse cohabits with another person;

3) Committing domestic violence;

4) Abuse or abandonment of family members.

1. Judging from what you said, the reason given by the woman does not necessarily mean that the court will not necessarily decide the divorce.

2. From the situation you described, you do not have any marital property, so there is no issue of property division.

3. Under normal circumstances, the child is raised by the woman, and you should pay child support.

4. No, you cannot.

Do you know the process of suing for divorce?

Do you want children or don't want children, the court will generally award the child to have a job and economic **, if there is property in your name, or items she should be able to share, if not, then it can't be shared, and the other is pre-marital property and post-marital property, when it comes to money, it is recommended that you entrust a lawyer.

The breakdown of the relationship between husband and wife is a very abstract concept that cannot be enumerated in detail. Article 32 of the Marriage Law stipulates that the people's court shall conduct mediation when hearing divorce cases; If the relationship has indeed broken down and mediation fails, the divorce should be granted.

In any of the following circumstances, if mediation fails, a divorce shall be granted: (1) bigamy or cohabitation of a spouse with another person;

2) Committing domestic violence or abusing or abandoning family members;

3) Those who have bad habits such as gambling and drug abuse that they do not change;

4) Separated for two years due to emotional discord;

5) Other circumstances that led to the breakdown of the relationship between the husband and wife to help you prove.

So you can also find other reasons to prove that your relationship has indeed broken down, you can also find the community neighborhood committee, or your unit to prove it!

Don't have any friends nearby? If there is no situation, you can go through the neighborhood committee, which can help you prove it.

There is no such law that says that a person has to prove what relationship breakdown ......You just go to the court to litigate, give evidence for a long time, the relationship between the two parties is broken, you can use environmental evidence, who is really, that person can prove that someone else's relationship is broken .........

1. Try **recording, pay attention to ** It is natural to mention the other party's name when you pass, talk about when to separate during the conversation, in short, just set out his words.

Then you can give a little benefit to the government unit, the proof is very simple, and the people there will settle it for you.

Although sympathetic to you, but like it was said upstairs. To take advantage of the favorable situation and take custody, it is necessary to collect evidence and file a lawsuit.

Also, such a man is a bit hateful.

But the damage to the child is unimaginable.

Remember to keep it private with your child or communicate in a different way.

If you love your children very much.

Although there is no marriage certificate, the parties live together and have children, and a de facto marriage is formed.

Now fighting for custody of the child, the chances of winning the lawsuit are better because the child is still young. Generally, if you have the ability to support yourself, the court will award the child to the woman.

As for child support, it's hard to say. If the negotiation fails, follow the relevant laws and regulations!

The child should be able to follow the mother

Because they weren't registered

The child can generally be awarded to the woman

The man must also take the child support

Very simple question: when you appear in court, you have to prove that 1 the child is often brought (raised) by the mother 2 that the child is happier with the mother than the father. 3 children's opinions (who is good to him, part only).

Upstairs is right, it depends on whether your friend has the ability to support him, and if he does, it is not much of a problem. The husband also has to pay child support.

I want to tell your friends that no matter what they do in the future, they must have a sense of the law, they have children without registration, although the law protects the legitimate rights of illegitimate children, but their marriage is not protected by the law, and the mother and child are the ultimate victims.

Look at how old the little ones are. The woman has a better chance of winning the case before the child is able to be independent. Children have the ability to defend themselves, and most of the courts hear the opinions of children... In the case of equality between men and women, there is no need to choose the woman to win.