Seek legal analysis! Thanks, legal case analysis! Urgent!

Email me and give you details!

Mr. B's behavior, the seizure of other people's identity cards, is of course an illegal act.

According to the second paragraph of Article 15 of the Identity Card Law, "no organization or individual may seize a resident identity card. Article 16: Where any of the following conduct is committed, the public security organs are to give a warning and a fine of up to 200 RMB, and where there are unlawful gains, confiscate the unlawful gains:

1) Using false supporting materials to fraudulently obtain a resident identity card;

2) Renting, lending, or transferring resident identity cards;

3) Illegally seizing another person's resident identity card. ”

Therefore, the seizure of the identity card is an illegal act, and Ms. A can report the case to the public security organ.

b. The act of asking for money is suspected of extortion. Here, Ms. A should pay attention to collecting relevant evidence, because the relationship between the two parties is special, so the evidence is very important. After there is sufficient evidence, a report may be made to the public security organs.

Regarding the question of the car, although the owner of the car is Ms. A, it depends on whether it is joint property, if not, then it is the destruction of other people's property, if this is not the case, it is difficult to identify.

When it comes to cars, it depends on them.

1. It is illegal to seize another person's ID card.

2 If there is domestic violence and you sue for divorce, the court will support it.

Article 32: Where a man and a woman request a divorce, the relevant departments may conduct mediation or directly file a divorce lawsuit with the people's court.

People's courts hearing divorce cases shall conduct mediation; If the relationship has indeed broken down and mediation fails, the divorce should be granted.

In any of the following circumstances, if mediation fails, a divorce shall be granted:

1) bigamy or cohabitation of a person with a spouse;

2) Committing domestic violence or abusing or abandoning family members;

3) Those who have bad habits such as gambling and drug abuse that they do not change;

4) Separated for two years due to emotional discord;

5) Other circumstances that lead to the breakdown of the relationship between husband and wife.

If one party is declared missing and the other party initiates divorce proceedings, the divorce shall be granted.

3 If the car is Ms. A's personal property, she is liable for the damage to the car. In the case of divorce property division, the car is not considered joint property.

Article 18 stipulates the scope of property that should be the property of one of the spouses. That is, in any of the following circumstances, it is the property of one of the husband and wife: (1) the premarital property of one party; (2) Medical expenses, living allowances for the disabled, and other expenses received by one party due to bodily injury; (3) property that is determined in the will or gift contract to belong to only one of the husband or wife; (4) Daily necessities for one party; (5) Other property that shall belong to one party.

That is, the following property acquired by the husband and wife during the existence of the marital relationship shall be jointly owned by the husband and wife: (1) wages and bonuses refer to the salaries, bonus income and various welfare policy income and subsidies of one or both parties during the existence of the marital relationship; (2) The income from production and operation refers to the income from production and operation of one or both spouses during the existence of the relationship between husband and wife; (3) The income from intellectual property rights refers to the income from intellectual property rights owned by one or both spouses during the existence of the marital relationship; (4) Property obtained by inheritance or gift refers to the property acquired by one or both parties as a result of inheritance and acceptance of gifts during the existence of the marital relationship. In the case of inheritance income, it refers to the acquisition of property rights, not the actual possession of property.

Even if the marriage is not actually in possession before the termination of the marital relationship, as long as the inheritance occurs during the existence of the marital relationship, the inherited property is also the joint property of the husband and wife, except as provided for in paragraph 3 of Article 18 of this Law; (5) Other property that shall be jointly owned.

4 As long as you inform the court that your identity card has been seized by the other party, the court will accept the claim. Of course, it is okay to reissue, but it will take a long time.

1. If the car is owned by Ms. A before marriage, it is recommended to report to the police, which is an act of intentional destruction of other people's property, including the seizure of ID cards, which can be reported to the police, and the police record can also be used as evidence against the man in court in the future;

2. In the case of domestic violence, please also keep the medical records, **, etc. as evidence, and you can ask the neighborhood office or the women's federation to come forward to coordinate the handling, and their handling records can be used as evidence.

Wouldn't it be better to reissue your ID card?

If the car is smashed, can't you just ask the other party to compensate?

Deposit? A ID card is in hand, the vehicle can claim compensation, what can B use to ask A to transfer the deposit?

At the end of the day, it's not a matter of legal analysis.

To add to the issue of vehicle claim, AB has joint property, and the divorce can only give A the share of the original property that B can share, which is equivalent to the car belonging to A.

If the car was bought by Ms. A before marriage, it is not considered joint property between the husband and wife. On the grounds of domestic violence, Ms. A's success rate for divorce should be high.

1. A gift of antiques from his uncle, designated as a gift to an individual, belongs to personal property, real estate purchased before marriage. B. Disability compensation metal to personal property.

2. In the case of the consent of both parties, it can be agreed that it shall be the joint property of the husband and wife, but it shall not be counted as the joint property of the husband and wife if A does not agree.

3. Yes, if both parties agree.

4. Yes, but it can only contribute to a certain period of economic help.

5. It can be agreed that it is binding on both husband and wife, but it cannot be confronted with the debt of a third party.

Chen X constituted a crime and should be convicted of intentional homicide, and if the victim was taken away from the scene of the accident and hidden, causing the victim to die without being rescued, he should be convicted and punished as the crime of intentional homicide in accordance with article 232 of the Criminal Law

Chen X commits the crime of intentional homicide and causes death after causing a traffic accident, and if the victim is taken away from the scene of the accident and hidden, so that the victim dies without being rescued, he shall be convicted and punished as intentional homicide in accordance with article 232 of the Criminal Law. The court said that Chen should first revoke his parole, and then combine the remaining unexecuted time limit with the time limit of the new judgment, and the calculation of the time limit is very complicated, so I will not talk about it here.

If the crime of intentional homicide is constituted, and the crime is committed again within 5 years after the completion of the sentence, it is a recidivist and is punished heavily, generally the death penalty.

Legal Provisions: Article 6 of the Judicial Interpretation on Traffic Accidents: Where the perpetrator hides or abandons the victim after taking the victim away from the scene of the accident after a traffic accident to avoid legal prosecution, causing the victim to die or be seriously disabled because the victim cannot be rescued, he shall be convicted and punished as the crime of intentional homicide or intentional injury in accordance with the provisions of Article 232 and the second paragraph of Article 234 of the Criminal Law, respectively.

Hello, the first question, 100 yuan is the proceeds of robbery, before the payment is made to the store, the criminal proceeds should be returned to the victim, so the police should confiscate his 100 yuan, and the loss of the store should be claimed to the criminal. The second question is that if the money has been paid to the store and the money has been transferred to the store for possession, the police cannot recover it, but the offender can only return the remaining dirt to the victim, and the offender will compensate for the shortfall.

Wow, the brother upstairs is already very detailed hehe!