Pentax KR, Canon 550D, that one is a little better

Is myopia just not being able to see things clearly and not being able to distinguish colors?It didn't mean anything else, just a little bit of incomprehension.

The KR is very cost-effective, but it is not as good as the 550D in all aspects of performance. If nothing else, the LCD behind it is enough for you to choke.

But I used to be a Pentax fan, and I didn't need a reason to like Pentax. It only takes one ** to convince me.

However, judging from the current state of affairs, Pentax's progress is a bit slow, and if you have any plans to upgrade in the future, you still have to think twice.

It's basically the same in terms of simple setups, but Pentax will be better. The quality of the 17-85 or 15-85 in the Canon pullover is good, but it is relatively a bit expensive. If the diagram is convenient, the 18-135 sleeve is also very practical.

Pentax's recommendation is to directly raise the budget on the K7, and Canon's 550D is very cost-effective.

It's almost impossible to buy a DSLR without changing the lens. Among the mainstream SLR brands, the best pullover is Nikon. The Pentax body is the most cost-effective, and the Canon is indeed good for portraits as well.

However, buying 550D is not cost-effective, compared to other machines. In addition, Pentax's cameras do not hold their value, and the lenses are expensive. You don't like Nikon's, so look at it this way, you can buy Canon, 600D is only a little more expensive than 550D, and with more flip screens, I think it's still worth it.

If the landlord is determined, it's 550d.

If you don't upgrade, Pentax and Sony are good choices.

Sony is a little better, especially the A55

Pentax is not recommended, not that the camera is bad, but the domestic audience is small, and the after-sales service is not convenient, it is recommended to choose CN two, and Canon 60D with 18-55 lens is recommended, which is very cost-effective.

Canon 550d I originally wanted to buy this, but I thought it was more expensive, and I was a newbie, so I bought 70d

550d can be adjusted for myopia Pentax is okay The ** gap sent out is not very visible hehe 550d Canon has a very good service attitude But it is required to issue an invoice.

I support 550d

The reasons are as follows: 1. Canon's brand advantage. Canon has a large customer base, and it's not for nothing that there are many people who play Canon.

And with such a large user base, it will be more convenient for you to communicate with others in the future. For example, borrowing a camera in the circle and asking a question or something is much better than Pentax.

2. It is still a brand advantage. If you use RAW format or something in the future, software support is also a problem. However, any software that supports RAW, Canon Nikon support is a priority, so you don't have to worry about problems such as the software not recognizing the file format.

Similarly, there is support for studio online shooting, etc.

D This machine is really good, although the control is still a little worse than 60D and Nikon D90, but it is also very convenient and fast. The camera function is also relatively easy to use. The reason why it has a strong response in the market is at least that this machine is not bad. It's hard to say about kr.

4. Problems with lens groups. Yes, you don't really need to buy a lot of lenses, but when you want a certain lens, the 550D has a much wider selection than Pentax and is easier to come by. In terms of low-priced lenses, Nikon is the best at it, Canon is second, and Pentax lenses are not so good.

For example, what I commonly use now is a 35mm prime lens, this type of lens, Canon can have 35 2, about 3000 yuan, Nikon has 35 2D and 35, the former is more than 2k, the latter is more than 1300, very affordable, and the effect is not bad, but Pentax is troublesome, 35 2 is more than 4600, and the similar 40mm biscuit head is only more than 2500, but the aperture is only, 35 is cheap, as long as 1k is more, but the aperture is only, which also makes you uncomfortable. Like 31 43 This kind of "princess" head is expensive and scary.

For another example, the 50 header, Canon's 50L, Nikon's 50** are relatively high, but Nikon and Canon also have 50, **as long as there are more than 700 pieces. And what about Pentax? Sorry, there's only one 50 on sale, **2700 more.

All in all, you don't need to buy a lot of lenses, but with Canon (or Nikon), you'll save a lot of heart and a lot of money in this area.

5. Believe me, as long as you buy a SLR, you will not be limited to visiting here! Because others will say, yo, you bought such an expensive camera, and the ** shooting is nothing more than that. At this time, you will be very depressed, and you will find ways to improve your photography skills.

That's when your needs change. What to do? Is it possible to take such an expensive machine out and replace it with a new one?

It's a shame.

Summary: Judging from the characteristics of the fuselage, KR does have his highlights, and it can also have a good effect with ** lenses. But obviously the 550D is more mature.

.Make a short film, the Canon is better.

Highly recommend the KR+ large double set. **Better than the same level double set of each family. And the quality of workmanship is also the best.

Don't hesitate any longer, go for the 550D.

I've used both of them, and as you mentioned above, Pentax imaging is really not very good. Generally speaking, the reliability of Canon machines is still very good. In addition, Canon's own software:

Digital Photo Professional is very powerful. The conversion is very convenient.

It is recommended to buy a KR single-head to practice first, and upgrade the lens in the future.

I've used both Pentax and Canon well, and it's no different as a newbie. Rotten ** is shot by rotten technology, not a machine.

I use Pentax, objectively speaking, Pentax is good, but if I buy another machine, I think I will buy Canon.

You mentioned that you can shoot portraits, if you shoot people a lot, don't think about Pentax, that requires you to have a high level of shooting or post-processing.

There are many people who like the color of Pentax, and there are just as many people who don't like it, you have to go and see for yourself the ** taken by kr, it is best to shoot it in the same environment as 550D ** (especially the portrait taken), to see if you can accept it.

To put it simply, Pentax is thick and colorful, and you can understand that it looks like a middle-aged person; The colors of the Canon are natural and light, and the color feeling can be understood as that of a young man.

From the convenience of purchasing and repairing, the number of suitable lenses, the versatility of accessories and old lenses, the user base, and other aspects, I personally recommend Canon.

There are many Canon lenses, and you can't buy that many either. Pentax lenses are not as many as Canon's, but even if they are few, they are enough for you. Pentax after-sales is really not enough.

But it would be an exaggeration to say that KR made a super bad film. Pentax cameras, direct filming, don't deal with it is great. Your friend's friend shot it with KR is super bad, and it is estimated that it will be even worse with 550D.

The main reason for buying a camera is to set it yourself, and you can buy whatever you like.

Double sets are necessary, choose the size of the pair to see what you mainly shoot, 50-200 lightweight, small double plus camera, very small camera bag can be put down. 55-300 is big and a little heavier. If you have enough budget and don't mind a larger bag and carrying problems, it is best to have a large pair.

Because the 55 300 lens is very good. Although it is 100mm longer, it is easy to use.

If you want to make a decision with simplicity and pursue a high resolution and a rich lens group, you will be able to make a 550D. Otherwise Pentax kr.

Ask the same question, plus A580 and D5000, 4 machines are tangled... It's been going on for a month ...