Isn t it a bit of a loss to buy AMD CPUs now?

I don't think it's better to wait, this mountain looks at that mountain high, the speed of electronic product updates is so fast, if you have that kind of thought, you don't have to buy anything, or buy a good machine for your own use, and for players, the computer is almost the same as a mobile phone, and now a better mobile phone costs three or four thousand yuan, so the mobile phone that came out in 98 is no one using it now? If you're catching up with the new trend, sell the old and buy the new.

I think it's the same with computers, buy a suitable one now, and wait for a good one to come out, and then upgrade, or buy a new one to play.

There's no need to be too advanced, PCI-E just came out when I bought a computer, and I also bought a PCI-E graphics card, and it's fine to use it now.

Again, it's good that the computer is enough!!

I'm using AMD's CPU now, it's good, it's not hot, it doesn't use electricity, the previous AMD and the current AMD can't be compared! Don't always measure a new product by its shortcomings.

What I'm using now is Shanlong 64-bit 2800+, which is very cool!

May you get the computer you want!!

You can never keep up with the pace of the times, even if you wait until AMD launches the 2nd generation CPU, and you buy it, it will make you cool for half a year at most.

Electricity consumption and heat dissipation are old ideas, and now they are no longer what they used to be.

AMD's dual-core server CPUs surpass Intel in terms of performance, power consumption, and frequency

Buy early and play early No money is like buying 2800 upstairs, and if you have money, you will go to Athlon Unless you want to be a server, otherwise 1G DDR400 and 1G 800 run World of Warcraft may not necessarily see the difference By the way, BS said earlier that AMD has been eliminated. . . I'm an AMD supporter, and at least half of the poor have computers on AMD.

AMD has now been phased out, and basically no one will buy it, so it is recommended that you buy DDR.

The main thing is that there are many differences in performance, which leads to the difference in performance, why is there a difference in performance?

My understanding is that this is mainly because AMD's capital is not enough, and its market value is less than 5 billion.

And Intel has more than 100 billion...

If the funds are insufficient, the investment in R&D will be insufficient, and now there is no wafer factory of its own, and it is even more troublesome to develop it. ··

If there is no money, there is no one, and if there is no money, there are not too many excellent engineers, and there is not enough talent... There were also issues with AMD's management team.

The two companies had different ideas in the early days.

Amd's founder, Bernie Sanders, was a marketing executive at Fairchild.

Moore, the founder of Intel, was an engineer at Fairchild.

AMD was an OEM for Intel in the early days, and the technical reserves of the two companies are much different, and the standard of microprocessors is still in the hands of Intel...

AMD is completely behind Intel in the experience of manufacturing microprocessors, so it often tries to break through in technology, but in the end it was all learned by Intel...

Intel is more technologically advanced! In high-end products, the most obvious!

However, the performance of AMD is better than that of Intel for low-end products, the same **! For the same performance, AMD is a little cheaper.

Because AMD performance is not good.

AMD has to use four cores to spell dual cores, six cores and eight cores to spell Intel quad cores, Intel's six cores, AMD is embarrassed.

1. This is not a relationship of fame, the current CPU is a penny, Intel's manufacturing process is advanced, level 2 cache is high, and AMD's manufacturing process is a little behind, Intel's 45nm technology has been out for a long time, and AMD's has just come out, the smaller the manufacturing process, the lower the power consumption, and the lower the calorific value, so that it can bring convenience to the performance prompt, the level 2 cache is equivalent to the workload of a worker, and the main frequency is equivalent to the number of workers, if there are more workers, And if everyone works slowly, they won't be able to increase their output much.

2. Intel's main frequency is relatively low, but the level 2 cache is high, and the speed of use will be faster, and AMD is often the opposite, for example, Intel's main frequency 3M2 level cache E7200 performance is definitely higher than AMD's main frequency 1M2 level cache 6000+

3. So in a word, the vast majority of today's computer hardware is a penny, and the expensive things are not necessarily all good goods.

One is that you have a lot of money, and you want to buy it in your heart!

The second is that the Intel platform is more stable, and it is better than AMD in terms of heat control!

Third, there are more programs that support Intel CPU instruction set!

You look at the second-hand ** on the Internet, AMD's second-hand ** has shrunk a lot, and now the third generation of Yuelong processor has been released, so the first generation has shrunk by half, and it is still brand new. On the other hand, Intel's second-hand market** has been maintained at seventy or eighty percent, and the i7 8700K can now be sold second-hand for more than two thousand. Cost-effectiveAMD,If you want to maintain the value, Intel is better,It is estimated that the people who bought the first generation of AMD Yuelong processor have been crying and fainting in the toilet,The memory frequency of the Yuelong processor has been bad,The power consumption temperature is also relatively high。