Is it better to use AMD s graphics card for the AMD platform? 5

Nor absolutely.

Because AMD's U has an A card in the acceleration should be a little better.

Of course, the difference is not too big.

Therefore, it will definitely not be bad to use an N card, not that the AMD+A card will be good.

The performance issue of the graphics card itself is key.

PS: Actually, I said that the biggest advantage of the AA platform is the cost performance.

Yes, the triple-A platform has software that can improve performance. Compared to **, it has an advantage over N card. Moreover, the A card is a 4+1 vector structure, with more SP units and strong multi-threaded processing capabilities (Zhongguancun has an evaluation), which is more in line with AMD's CPGPU concept (that is, the CPU and the graphics card work together and are what they are best at) while the N card is a bit like wanting to replace the CPU.

Of course, the N-card has PhysX and CUDA. It depends on your personal preference.

Not necessarily, the compatibility of the platform built with the same brand is relatively better, but this is only relatively, not absolutely, if you use AMD's CPU + NV motherboard + AMD's graphics card, it's no problem, or AMD's CPU + AMD's motherboard + NV's graphics card can also be, now the compatibility between hardware is already very good, the key depends on what you use, it is recommended to use NV's graphics card to play games.

According to AMD's own statement, using 3A to form a spider platform or dragon platform improves the overall performance by 7%.

No, but out of buying habits, I usually choose a card.

There's nothing you can't buy, AMD's graphics cards are still okay. It's the problem of dropping the driver before, plus many games are not very well optimized for AMD, which makes everyone feel that AMD's GPU is not good. In 2022, AMD's optimization of drivers and games is very good, and there are few drivers dropped, so AMD's graphics cards can be bought, and even cost-effective.

I think Intel is a little better in terms of compatibility and stability, AMD's quad-core is okay at the price of 600 700, but don't buy it if it's a little more expensive, just buy i5 with more money! i5 can directly kill AMD's CPU at the same price with a casual heat!But the 600 700 price point is very cost-effective!

AMD acquired ATI in 2006, and ATI is a graphics card company on a par with NVIDIA.

So AMD's graphics card technology is much stronger than Intelle.

Intel's CPU technology is much ahead of AMD, and this is an obvious advantage, so now AMD is taking the low-cost and cost-effective route, otherwise it will definitely be competitive, but Intel's.

Don't people say that Intel's GPU is to buy a CPU and get a general graphics card, while AMD's GPU is to buy a graphics card and get a general CPU

AMD is now working the nuclear display, I don't know what your nuclear graphics model is, it is estimated to be HD7660. This can be combined with high-frequency memory to reach the level of GT440. Personally, I like AMD more, hehe, it's more generous than Inter Inter doesn't have much advantage in the CPU, right, the current CPU performance is excessive, and the entry-level CPU of 300 yuan is not lazy.

Most people are on the quad-core, hehe.

There is no such thing as who is good or who is bad, both have their own merits, and they are judged according to specific needs:

NVIDIA graphics cards have stronger support for games, so if you play games a lot, it is recommended to choose an NVIDIA graphics card.

AMD graphics cards have strong single-precision floating-point arithmetic capabilities, so if you have graphics needs, you can choose AMD graphics cards.

The AMD graphics card and nvidia graphics card that belong here refer to whether the graphics card chip is an AMD chip or an NVIDIA chip.

There's this saying.,Play games and choose N card.,Draw and choose a card.,But in actual terms,N card support is better.,I mean in terms of games.。 In terms of theory, the A card has strong single-precision floating-point arithmetic ability, while the N card is weak, which is very good for software or games that require high parallel operations. But the architecture,I feel like it's a good point for N cards.,High-end graphics cards play game effects.,I feel like the frame rate of N card games fluctuates relatively small.,It's more stable than a card.。

In fact, high-end graphics cards are almost the same, and most of the games supported by the A card are biased towards textures, and those with more textures are more dominant. However, the N card can support physical acceleration, to be honest, I'm using GTX570 SLI, and the actual physical acceleration I can only see it in**ah, stones, or something, and I feel that it doesn't mean much. What about the picture,A card tends to be soft,N card tends to be bright,This depends on personal preference。

As for the price, the high-end is not cheap, so it almost costs thousands of miles away. I hope you are satisfied with your purchase.

AMD is cost-effective (**affordable), NVIDIA's is not easy to make mistakes, and the compatibility performance is good, in fact, they are all about the same, choose the cheap one.

High-end graphics cards, AMD is more cost-effective, and low-end can buy NVIDA! In fact, the gap between the two is very small for ordinary players, the technology is the same, and the most **** just launched by the flagship version at the price is 3999 yuan!

The rendering of the AMD card is good, but the human eye can't see it, if you play a large stand-alone machine, you still choose the N card, the compatibility is good! If you are focusing on games, we recommend GTX460 or GTX560TI, 99% of the games are won!

AMD generally consumes less power than NV. First of all, there are more AMD.

It can't be said that sleep is good, each has its own benefits Nvidia's graphics cards are a little more for games, and AMD's is a little more for colors.

Which one do you think is delicious, noodles or rice, both have their own good (on the same model), although they all say that N card is better to play games, but A card is now slowly not inferior.