Arguments for the debate Arguments for the Narrow Road Is the Wise Winning or the Brave Winning Posi

When you meet on a narrow road, the brave wins! Such a classic sentence, indisputable! Reason 1:

This sentence is applied in war, and when you encounter the enemy, you will either die or I will live! What's more, they met on a narrow road? Nose to nose with the enemy, subconscious behavior must be desperate!

Instead of thinking before and after! If you are brave enough, the enemy will be afraid of you, and you may be able to win more with less! At the same time, we do not deny the role of wisdom, but sometimes wisdom does not work in war!

It's when we meet on a narrow road! Let's not question the scientific conclusions of the ancients, just like Sun Tzu's Art of War and the Compendium of Materia Medica, for them, we only have the inheritance in criticism, not the rejection in questioning! All in all, the wise have the advantages of the wise, the brave have the strengths of the brave, and when they meet on the narrow road, the brave is the winner.

We should not insist on courage or wisdom in one bite, but pay attention to the importance of the inseparability of the two. The brave wins when they meet on a narrow road: War Cases:

Break the cauldron and fight against the water. Huang Jiguang blocked the gun's eye. Dong Cunrui.

In the air war attack on the Eastern Front in World War II, the Soviets and the Germans, the wise man wins: Nabulun formed an army, and the Chinese guerrilla warfare.

The Wise Man expands the concept of the narrow road and bases it on the present. For example, buying and selling is a win-win situation for the economy and society. Others, such as, Trojan horses (remember to highlight the narrow road, highlight the consequences). The general's famous saying, "When the narrow road meets, the brave wins, and the brave meets the wise." ”

For example, a narrow road refers to the fact that the environment in which the character is located has restrictions on the character's ability to play, as if he is tied hand and foot, and at this time, relying on courage obviously does not help. To give an example, China also has Tai Chi, with the help of force, the opponent's attack must be skillfully defused, and the army will surrender without a fight in the resolution.

The best countermeasure is to block the opponent's way of life with judgment in your own argument.

In this topic, it is necessary to define and cut "the narrow road meets, someone wins" - what is the meaning of "narrow road meeting"? When the two sides are unable to dodge, they are about to start a confrontation or confrontation, giving you a short time to think and react, and it is difficult to systematically analyze the enemy and think about countermeasures, so you can only rely on instinct to play. What does it mean for the brave to win or for the wise?

It doesn't mean that you must beat the other party, but that you have a high win rate. You savor the differences.

For example, if you have a debate today, it is not a narrow encounter, because there is enough time to prepare beforehand, and this is the victory of the wise.

But when they meet on a narrow road, the winning rate of the brave is definitely high.

When the narrow road meets, the brave wins, the brave meets the wise, the wise wins, the virtuous wins, and the virtuous wins.

That is to say, they are all brave men, and of course those who are wise will win.

And those who are also brave, wise, and of course virtuous will win.

Of course, if it is a brave, wise, and virtuous person, the last person who is kind is the final victor.

According to your topic, the target is different, if according to the civil and military generals only in the "narrow road meeting", the same brave, the wise wins.

If the simple text is at the level of the "narrow road", of course, the brave wins.

Zhengfang can be expanded with a "narrow road" specific environment that requires specific talents to play.

If it is the opposite, you can talk about the role of wisdom on the premise of having a positive side and having "bravery" on both sides.

There is also an argument that is beneficial to the opposing side: you can ask the other party this way, if both sides are brave and the other is wise, what do you say next? (Try to put aside the "narrow road" and let the conditions be equal).

Connected, the wise meet the virtuous wins, and the virtuous meet and the harmonious wins.

This is what people who are beginning to have wisdom can think of, and it shows the importance of wisdom, not courage.

If for Yong, we must emphasize the importance of the "narrow road" and predictability, and deny the other party, and then in a specific environment (narrow road environment) wisdom is not important and does not dominate.

If you want to continue to score, you can only rely on the following words to fight back: What did Zhu Yuanzhang do in the first place? Monk?

Herding cows? What did you do later? Emperor?

If you let an environment where there is only a so-called "brave" monk and a cowherd baby, can you produce an emperor in a specific "narrow road" environment? No, then it means that wisdom is absolutely dominant.

That's all I can say.

The above may only be a draw, continue to develop the mind.

When playing chess, both players win by wisdom.

You can't be Chang Da too......I'm still looking for a defense......

I'm looking for the brave to win ......This is a coincidental ......

1. Argument: Our view is that the brave wins in the face of opportunities. First of all, we all know that opportunities in real life are often fleeting, and in the face of fleeting opportunities, the brave will not hesitate while the wise will think twice, and after thinking twice, the opportunity has been lost, then everything has become empty talk.

Let me ask, if the wisdom of a wise man does not even have a chance to play a role, then is he a worthless hindsight? Secondly, after thinking about it, the wise man is actually preparing a retreat for himself, and he can retreat when necessary, just like Zhang Han at the end of Qin, when he learned that Zhao Gao had framed him, he had a heart to surrender. And the brave will not give himself a way out, just like Xiang Yu, who is ruined.

In fact, the duel between the wise and the brave has already been decided by the giant deer two thousand years ago, why is the opponent still obsessed? Again, everyone has seen "Soldier Assault", right? In this TV series, Xu Sanduo is not a wise man, but he is a brave man, and he does not bow to any difficulties, so in the end he is the winner.

He was very shrewd but became a complete loser in the end. Isn't this a living example of the victory of the brave over the wise? Everyone is equal in the face of opportunities, but only those fearless warriors can grasp it without hesitation, and in summary, we insist that the brave wins in front of opportunities.

For thousands of years, the wisdom of the wise has concluded that the brave wins when they meet on a narrow road.

Looking ahead and looking backwards, all are wise men, but the road is narrow.

The opportunity is small: one wrong step will lose the whole game, and those who have the courage and no strategy, even if they act first, lack of strategy, and cannot take advantage of the best conditions

Your so-called thinking is nothing more than the wise man thinking, the brave man acting first, and the brave man taking the lead in time But the conditions for victory, in addition to the time condition, there are many other conditions, and taking the lead in time does not mean victory.

The so-called plan and then move, the enemy moves and I move, the enemy does not move and I do not move, knowing oneself and knowing that the other side can win a hundred battles The brave will not know anything but fighting, and the light skills can fly over a pit and a hundred pits, and the wise man will be exhausted, after all, he will not be able to withstand the world's magic skills that the brave man is inferior to his sword and gun.