Dilemmas in the debate competition, the skills of the second debate in the debate competition

Debate: Internet language poisons China's language and culture.

I think it's okay?

First of all, explain your position and intentions.

Speeches are made with the heart, not the brain.

Thesis: Explain the significance of Internet language to Chinese culture from the aspects of new Internet vocabulary and pun language.

Rebuttal: The argument of the other side lies mainly:

1.Internet spam culture: refuted from the perspective of cultural management and self-discipline.

2.Non-standard network terms (such as "Banzhu", etc.) - start with the limitations of the input method.

Argument: The main thing is to refute the other party's point of view, because you are the opponent, you should pay attention to "refute and stand", that is, first refute the other party's point of view, so that the other party cannot cite the shortcomings of the Internet culture, or prove that this shortcoming does not exist, and will not exist in the end, and it is not a shortcoming. Then put forward your own point of view (above) according to the argument, and this point of view (the above argument) can only be refuted from the unethical nature of the word (e.g., some insulting, very pornographic, very violent), you just need to prove that there are fewer unethical things.

P.S. There is less proof for unethical things.

Because the progress of society lies in the active application of the Internet by the majority of netizens, and from the perspective of China's social development speed, the quality of netizens has been greatly improved, and the managers of the first class tend to delete some garbage information, so those things are just a drop in the bucket and insignificant, and will surely withdraw from the historical stage with the progress of social civilization.

Because: social civilization must progress.

Therefore, the conditions of the above argument are irrefutable.

So: the proposition is proven.

Finally, I will give you a more mysterious question:

You: Would you like to ask the opponent to think about why the language of the Internet enriches China's language and culture?

Because the above question is a "complex question", whether the other party is or not, it shows that he acknowledges the content of the "".

Note that the above questions are of a sophistic nature, and once they are recognized by the other party, they may be judged as foul ......

Use with caution!!

Internet language will only make others incomprehensible, and I think it's better not to use it

You didn't make your position clear, so I'm sorry, I can't help you.

I'm sorry! ......

Summary. Hello dear, you can choose the position of one debate if you are less able, but due to the different rules of the competition system, there may be some differences, and sometimes four debates are also OK. However, the three debates should be more aggressive and not suitable for novices. Fourth, it is important to argue with difficulty.

However, if you are a novice with a quick mind, you can try to play the second and fourth debates. If you argue for the first time, it is good to write the manuscript in advance, and the requirements for the spot are not as high as the second, third and fourth debates.

Which is more important, one debate, two debates, three debates, and four debates in the debate competition? Which is slightly less suitable?

Hello dear, you can choose the position of one debate if you are less able, but due to the different rules of the competition system, there may be some differences, and sometimes four debates are also OK. However, the three debates should be more aggressive and not suitable for novices. Fourth, it is important to argue with difficulty.

However, if you are a novice with a quick mind, you can try to play the second and fourth debates. If you argue for the first time, it is good to write the manuscript in advance, and the requirements for the spot are not as high as the second, third and fourth debates.

Which is more difficult, the second debate or the third debate?

The second argument is the same as the third argument.

The skills of the second debate in the debate competition are:Use the rebuttal validity hierarchy to carry out**. Language – Illustration – Logic – Definition – Premise.

For example:

Language: "I'm a bad person".

Example: I've cheated money, I've been in jail I've cheated money to raise money for my parents' treatment, and I've been in jail because I often help people.

Logic: Because I do bad things, I'm a bad person vs not all bad people who do bad things, and not all good people who do good things.

Definition: Bad: Understandable? Full of evil?

Premise: Actually, I'm not human?

In the training of reactions, it is the key to break through the old way of thinking and think about problems from a new perspective. The speed of reaction should be improved through continuous and intensive training in confrontation.

Keep a cool head on the fieldWhen you notice that the other party is evading or not answering a question of your side, you should attack continuously, even if you repeat the question again.