Which is better, Kirin 710 or Kirin 810

First of all, the benchmark objects of the Kirin 810 are Qualcomm's Snapdragon 710 and 730, and the Kirin 710 is not the same step at all.

Another process, the seven-nanometer process is the process of the flagship-level processor, and then the large core framework of the frame A76 is also the flagship-level frame structure, which is consistent with the framework of the Kirin 980, and then higher than the A75 frame of the Snapdragon 845. The process alone is already very powerful, you must know that only Apple (A12), Qualcomm (855), Huawei (980, 810) in the world have seven nanometer chips, and Huawei has two. The glory 9x released yesterday directly brought seven nanometers to the thousand-yuan machine level, and it has to be said that the significance of the Kirin 810 era is higher than the performance significance.

Analyze from the CPU. The big core of the Kirin 810 is Cortex-A76, and the Snapdragon 710 is Cortex-A75, and there is a generation difference. The former has an additional transmitter unit in the microarchitecture, so the IPC of floating-point computing is twice that of the latter, and running a GEMM at the same frequency is twice as fast as the latter.

int8, the former supports dot instructions, which is faster!

The HiSilicon Kirin 810 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G have almost equal performance, but the power consumption is a little worse.

It's basically in the middle of the dividing line of mobile SoCs, with strong on top and weak on bottom.

I have used the Honor 20s equipped with Huawei HiSilicon Kirin, I can only say that it is okay, Huawei EMUI (Honor MagicUI) is good in smoothness, but the details and operation logic are extremely poor.

Even though it is a 7nm process, the heat will still be heated, and if the heat dissipation is not good, it really can't, the heat dissipation of the Honor 9X Pro is still necessary, and the temperature control is the killer of chip performance.

On Kirin 810 alone, the performance is not too strong, but it is not very weak, the A76, the single-core performance is good, and the multi-core is OK, after all, the A55 is too weak, and the six A55 will not have a strong performance in how to play.

In terms of GPU, in order to run the score performance, G52 forcibly six-core, frequency forcibly 820MHz, good performance in running scores, power consumption is a bit overturned, and the heating is also a little large.

Just daily use and occasional play of games, it can be said that it can be used and sufficient.

Yesterday, I used the Huawei nova7pro equipped with Huawei Hisilicon Kirin 985, but from the use experience, I didn't feel much change, and finally, I returned the phone.

Basically, it can be said that Kirin 810 has half of the performance experience of Apple A12, and Kirin 985 is the same, it is also half of the experience, except for running scores, there is basically no big change in daily use, and you will not have any obvious perception.

It is definitely that the Kirin 810 is better than the Kirin 710 processor, and it is more advanced in terms of the thickness of the chip and the manufacturing of the chip.

It must be the Kirin 818 that the better processors are all algebraically divided, and the higher you go, the faster the processing speed, the better.

The Kirin 810's overall performance is comparable to that of the Snapdragon 765, and it is positioned as a mid-range processor.

In terms of CPU and UX scores, the Kirin 810 is not much different from the Snapdragon 765; In terms of GPU scores, the score of the Snapdragon 765 is slightly higher than that of the Kirin 810; In terms of MEM running scores, the score of the Kirin 810 is slightly higher than that of the Snapdragon 765.

The specific running score of the two:

Kirin 810 adopts 2*A76 large core + 6*A55 small core design, based on 7nm process, and the highest main frequency is. Snapdragon 765 adopts a 2*A76 large core + 6*A55 small core design, based on the 7nm process process, and the highest main frequency is. It should be noted that the Kirin 810 does not support 5G networks.

The Snapdragon 765 uses an integrated 5G baseband that supports both SA and NSA modes.

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 810 processor CPU is composed of two large cores, six small cores, and the GPU is Mali-G52 MP6 Single-core score: 2825. Multi-core score:

7925, GPU is Manhattan frames:, and the weighted total score is 17825 points.

The Kirin 810 is better, the Kirin 810 has a more advanced process, and the Kirin 810 is a processor that came out after the Snapdragon 710.

The overall performance of the Kirin 810 is comparable to that of the Snapdragon 765, and it is positioned as a mid-range local physical device.

In terms of CPU and UX scores, the Kirin 810 is not much different from the Snapdragon 765; In terms of GPU scores, the score of the Snapdragon 765 is slightly higher than that of the Kirin 810; In terms of MEM running scores, the score of the Kirin 810 is slightly higher than that of the Snapdragon 765.

The Kirin 810 should be stronger than the Snapdragon 835 and weaker than the Snapdragon 845.

The Kirin 810 is based on TSMC's 7nm process, which is also a flagship level. The performance is also quite strong, using a combination similar to Snapdragon 675 2*A76 large core +6*A55 small core, Kirin 810 The main frequency is the highest, and the single-core performance is similar to that of Kirin 980 (the main frequency is lower than 980 There is still some gap). The performance of the Snapdragon 675 is very strong, and the CPU performance completely surpasses the Snapdragon 835, so the Kirin 810 also performs very well in CPU performance.

In terms of GPU, it integrates a customized version of Mali-G52 MP6 clocked at 820MHz. In addition, the Kirin 810 also uses Huawei's self-developed Da Vinci AI chip, which has a higher running score than the Snapdragon 855, and is the current mobile phone SoC with the best AI capabilities.

Kirin 810: 10,000 points for CPU, 10,000 points for GPU, 230,000 points for comprehensive score;

Snapdragon 835: CPU score 10,000 points, GPU score 10,000 points, comprehensive score 210,000 points;

Snapdragon 845: 10,000 points for CPU, 10,000 points for GPU, 260,000 points for all;

Theoretically, the CPU architecture of the Kirin 810 is more advanced, but it only has two A76 cores, so it can only match the Snapdragon 845, and the GPU performance is not as good as the Snapdragon 835. At the same time, it can also be seen that the GPU performance of the latest processors of the Snapdragon 7 series and 6 series is not as good as that of the previous generations of the Snapdragon 8 series.

Received the headline recommended Q&A, I am very happy to help you with this question, I hope to help you through mine, this is my personal opinion and opinion, if you have different opinions, welcome to leave a message, we are together, we grow together and learn together.

The Kirin 810 SoC is manufactured using a 7nm process and has 2 A76 large cores and 6 A55 small cores. In addition, it also supports Kirin Gaming+ technology, as well as dual SIM dual VOLTE.

The Snapdragon 710 uses the 2+6 architecture of the KRYO 360 core, the performance core frequency and efficiency core frequency, while the Snapdragon 710 only uses the 10nm LPP process.

Kirin 810 Antutu running score: about 237000.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 Antutu running score: around 174000.

To summarize the above, the Kirin 810 is better than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 710

The above is my summary on this issue, written based on my knowledge and experience, if there is any immaturity, I hope to correct. In the meantime, if you like me, please give me a like and follow. I sincerely hope that the answers will help my friends.

Thank you Toutiao, provide a platform, life is more exciting with you, and I hope you will share and comment to discuss this topic together. Finally, I sincerely wish all friends in the world to be healthy, healthy, happy, happy and happy at all times regardless of work and life, family and everything, and make a fortune every year, Wishing you prosperity, thank you!