Will the middle class become proletarian in the face of an economic crisis?

When an economic crisis comes, it means inflation or deflation. So how big is the impact of the economic crisis on the middle class? I think for the middle class, most of the property of the middle class is savings, and after inflation, the property is diluted and falls to the proletariat in an instant.

Therefore, in the eyes of many economists, the concept of the middle class is actually about the same as the proletariat, because they are a group of people who do not have the control of production resources.

Yes, because after the middle class encounters an economic crisis, it will definitely lose its property, and if it is less, it will not become proletarian, and if it is more, it will definitely become proletarian.

Yes. No one has been spared from the economic crisis. The wealth of the wealthy has only shrunk. Some of the middle class will become zero wealth. It depends on the individual. But emaciated camels are bigger than horses. It's still stronger than the bottom.

The middle class, that is, the group that has the means of production but not many, the petty bourgeoisie (originally also called the national bourgeoisie, but with the expansion of capital, the current national bourgeoisie is no longer a small-scale petty bourgeoisie). Such as small owners, etc. Those who do not have the means of production are proletarians, such as doctors, doctors, engineers and other ordinary white-collar workers and workers.

The petty bourgeoisie, like the proletariat, is exploited by the bourgeoisie. The economic crisis is the stubborn disease of capitalism, which is basically the last blow to the middle class and the proletariat.

The middle class is originally a concept that was created to divide the proletariat.

Those who own the means of production are called the bourgeoisie. Those who do not have the means of production are called the proletariat.

The bourgeoisie is subdivided, and only the petty bourgeoisie.

The proletariat is subdivided, and only then is there the middle class.

In essence, the middle class does not have the means of production, it is actually the proletariat.

In the event of an economic crisis, it is the proletariat.

In the financial crisis, no one in that class can guarantee that their wealth will not shrink, and if they are not managed well, they will become proletarian.

See if you have a rainy day, if you borrow too much and lose your job, you may become proletarian.

That's right, we must not let him work hard. into the proletarian. To regain this loss. You do it together. I have great strength, and I must not go bankrupt. It's good for everyone.

Of course there will be, there will be bankrupt ones, that is, those who are in debt.

The dilemma of the middle class is mainly that the disposable assets are extremely limited, unlike the wealthy, who have a lot of disposable cash flow, the middle class is relatively rich, but there is basically no disposable cash or capital.

First of all, the house accounts for the majority of the assets, and the income is squeezed by half by the mortgage, which is the dilemma of most state Liang middle class. A owner-occupied house looks like an asset that can grow slowly, but it is actually a liability, which cannot be liquidated and provides cash flow.

The middle class can only shout for freedom in the limited space of milk tea freedom and vegetable market freedom, but once they have to face the three mountains of education, medical care, and housing, they have no confidence and are at a loss. What's worse is that the disposable assets of the middle class are already difficult to boost.

In the middle class's capital pool, the mortgage and children's education needs to be prepared for the war on the expenditure side, and the expenses are continuous, and the income side, the cash flow inflow of the middle class is also extremely unstable.