Martial arts: Which is more practical, taiquando or fighting?

Of course, taekwondo is the most practical, whether it is performance, clothing, promotion system, training environment, influence, opening operation, etc., it is the most mature, traditional martial arts are mixed, the system is chaotic, not suitable for chain development, and fighting is useless in addition to fighting.

Taekwondo pays attention to performance, and there are some discussions similar to Chinese martial arts, there are also fights, mainly four legs, but most of the games are based on points and scores, and there is no lethality, although there are many people who learn taekwondo now, most of them are unprofessional, and they will come out to open a museum after two years of study, and even people who will not learn for a month or two can also take lessons directly, because taekwondo is too simple, a set of Tai Chi chapters can teach you for half a year, and it should have been learned in two days. The rest is a matter of etiquette. It's more practical to fight again. ‍‍

Fighting is about confrontation, that is, what we call actual combat, mainly practical, the moves seem simple and complex, punches, legs, and falls are very comprehensive, the so-called hands are two doors, all rely on the legs to hit people, far kicks, close hits, close falls, these are the characteristics of the fighting that describe Sanda, unlike taekwondo, which only has simple leg attacks, and even the head will not be defended, let alone fall, once the Sanda athlete is close then taekwondo will completely lose resistance, this is a reality that cannot be changed.

Fighting is more practical. Taekwondo's hands are not to be used, except for kicking. And fighting includes punches and kicks, and if you defend yourself, then learn to grapple.

Martial arts are the most practical! Compared with fighting, martial arts are more interesting, not easy to get injured, exercise the body, and have a certain role in self-defense. Regular practice of martial arts often benefits. Fighting and taekwondo are more combative in nature and are prone to injury.

Taekwondo leg skills cannot be played in street fights, especially in very narrow places, and his main skills are not fully displayed due to the limitations of the terrain. Fighting can hit the opponent in all directions, and in narrow places, you can still use punches, throws, and takes.

Fighting is a sport that develops physical fitness in an all-round way, and it is an all-round combat skill that combines the strengths of various martial arts. It includes boxing techniques, kick techniques in taekwondo, throwing techniques in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, etc., which require more coordination in all aspects of the body, and are more comprehensive fighting skills.

Martial arts are most useful in street fighting, and of course the physical fitness has to keep up. Fighting is most useful in the ring, and taekwondo is the most useful.

Kung fu is not bad when you practice to the extreme, you can't say who is better than whom, taekwondo was also very practical at first, but it slowly became more performances, but it still depends on how you practice, practice well, practical may not be weaker than fighting.

Taekwondo training, the pursuit of speed, strength and effect of the action, taekwondo does not pay attention to showmanship, all movements are based on technical fighting, and it is very practical for ordinary people.

Taekwondo is a sport that originated in South Korea and has a strong sense of ritual, and its requirements for movements are not very strict. It is a fighting skill that is fought only with legs. It's relatively simple compared to Sanda.

I don't need to ask, it must be fighting.

You can all strengthen your body, but as a Chinese, if I have a child, I still want him to learn martial arts.

Classmate, I highly recommend you to learn Chinese martial arts!

Although I learned taekwondo, at least in China to practice taekwondo is not technical, just spend boxing and embroidering legs to play with the situation, and martial arts are different, to be accurate is very practical, if it is a real taekwondo and martial arts fighting, practicing martial arts will have the upper hand, martial arts not only use both hands and legs, all parts of the body are ** (do you think about how many years Chinese martial arts have been inherited?) Taekwondo is mainly leg kung fu, which is more difficult to stand on the upper hand.

It should be mentioned that if you want to be proficient in practicing Chinese martial arts, the time requirements will be relatively simple, but the purpose of martial arts is: to strengthen the body!

If the landlord just wants to learn and play, (don't expect realistic self-defense to come in handy), then practicing taekwondo is also a good choice.

Modify the answer: Whether it is taekwondo or martial arts, it has no effect on growing taller, if you only ask to grow taller, go directly to practice basketball.

Which one wins Taekwondo vs traditional martial arts? Liu Hailong only used one round to tell you the answer.

Nowadays, no one practices martial arts to fight, and now urban people pay more attention to self-cultivation, which is also the reason why taekwondo can be popular all over the world.

Just like parkour, taekwondo is a sport that explores one's potential, and we young people prefer this kind of self-presentation.

Chinese martial arts pay attention to the combination of form and meaning, and carry out a whole-body exercise, which is comprehensive. Taekwondo, on the other hand, is mainly used for leg exercises, and the exercise effect of other body parts is extremely low, and the practicability is obviously not high.

Chinese martial arts is not only to strengthen the body, but also has a good self-defense effect, strong physique can be used for various dangerous situations, and Chinese martial arts have gone abroad, defeated many masters from all over the world; The fact that taekwondo is obviously not very practical, and there are almost no cases of using taekwondo to defeat masters, is enough to show that Chinese martial arts are stronger than taekwondo.

Chinese martial arts are broad and profound, and the moves that can be practiced are very rich, which can be selected according to different physical conditions, and are suitable for the vast majority of people to practice; Taekwondo is mainly based on retreating the feet, which is too one-sided, and has greater requirements for physical conditions, and is only suitable for a small number of people to practice.

Strictly speaking, taekwondo is also a kind of martial arts, taekwondo can be exercised, martial arts can be done, and it is more than that, therefore, it is better for children to choose martial arts when they have a choice.

I hope the answer is helpful to you, I wish you a happy life, everything goes well, if you are satisfied, give a thumbs up after the trouble, and give a good life.

Happy Mid-Autumn Festival.

Hello question, thank you.

Which one wins Taekwondo vs traditional martial arts? Liu Hailong only used one round to tell you the answer.

Which is the most powerful in taekwondo, karate or sanda? After reading it, I finally understood.

It depends on how well you master it, but it is recommended that you learn martial arts. Because there are many martial arts moves with both hands and feet. Whereas taekwondo mainly uses the legs. That's all there is to it.

It's hard to say, I personally think that taekwondo is more suitable for actual combat, I have studied martial arts routines for 3 years, and I feel that I can't use it in actual combat, and sanda is very useful in actual combat. I am learning taekwondo now, and I feel that it is more useful than martial arts routines in actual combat. Learning well and persevering, it doesn't mean that you can practice it in a few years.

There is no martial art that is powerful, and there is nothing that is not powerful. Because, talent is the key to distinguishing whether it is good or not. Since you asked this question, you must want to learn martial arts, but you don't know what to learn, right?

If the child is still young and wants to strengthen his body, he can choose taekwondo and martial arts. But if you want to defend yourself, it is recommended to choose practical martial arts, such as Jeet Kune Do, Sanda, Muay Thai, Israeli Martial Arts, etc.

Boxing has been said by everyone, there is no good or bad boxing, there is no easy to be strong or weak, only in the practice of martial arts. The master only used a simple horse step punch to hit the Tai Chi Bagua Wing Chun type Yi Grandmaster, and the battle proved that one force can break ten thousand methods. But generally speaking, martial arts are mostly focused on the basics!

So regardless of external factors! Taekwondo is powerful under five years, and above it has its strengths and weaknesses, and more than ten years it is more powerful.

Needless to say, martial arts, of course. Taekwondo has more fancy styles and does not pay much attention to actual combat. If you want to become a criminal policeman, you can start with sanda and then gradually get into traditional martial arts.

I'm telling you, there is no strongest martial arts, only the strongest people, you just practice playing the brain, and when you can break a brick at once, then you dare to fight with others casually A lot of things have to work hard It's not that martial arts are good, whoever practices them will be invincible, and they can open up the world and save the world This depends on which one you like.

Martial arts are just a general term...

It mainly depends on which aspect you want to embody. If you want to be as light as a swallow and somersault legs, that taekwondo is good, and parkour is also very good.

I want hand-to-hand combat, sanda, Muay Thai, karate, etc.

I want to use static braking, Wing Chun, Jeet Kune Do, Tai Chi or something.

Each kind of kung fu is different.

Taekwondo is good, easy to learn, fancy movements, and can also call two sentences from time to time, and the bubble mm is special.

Martial arts are too difficult, it's hard to learn, and the coach still loves to beat people, but he has learned the advanced movements of taekwondo in the basic movements. Hehe. The actual combat ability is better.

Sanda, of course, is preferred. Taekwondo is useless. It's still nice to watch.

You can compare it like this.

A basic with the legs.

At most, a kick.

Kick off a few planks.

But martial arts for example.

Bajiquan 1 backrest.

Leaning on the broken willow tree. Small willow tree).

Who do you say?

Taekwonxing has limitations, if you are a Chinese learning martial arts!

In my opinion, the actual combat ability of taekwondo is not easy to control. If you don't have a good consciousness, it's a dish. The term martial arts has a wide range, and in general it can be divided into modern martial arts and traditional martial arts.

Practicing traditional martial arts requires a lot of time and money. If you can't endure hardships yourself, you can't practice. I have been practicing boxing for almost ten years, and in my conscience, if I am in the ring, I will definitely not be able to win against professional Muay Thai fighters, karate, sanda, etc., even if I have a hard time being a black belt in taekwondo.

If there is no limit, without protective gear, you can seal your eyes, buckle your throat, and tease your crotch. The back of the head, the base of the ears, the back of the waist, and the temples can be hit. It was definitely not me who was hospitalized.

Traditional martial arts are now in decline, and beating people is easy to get disabled. Let's go learn some sanda, and if you are interested in being a criminal policeman, you can learn forehand grappling.

Isn't taekwondo a martial art?

Free to fight.

Fighting, also known as international self-origin by fighting, European and American full contact free karate, etc., it is not confined to any fixed routines, but advocates free play in actual combat according to the battle situation, flexible use of punches, feet, elbows, knees and falls and other three-dimensional techniques, both long and short, comprehensive display, in order to finally knock down or defeat the opponent for the purpose.

Sanda is a modern competitive sport in which two people use kicking, hitting, wrestling and defending techniques in martial arts to engage in hand-to-hand confrontation according to certain rules, and it is an important part of Chinese martial arts.

Boxing is a sport in which boxing gloves are worn for fighting. It has both amateur (also known as Olympic boxing) and professional commercial competitions.

There is no comparison between the three, fighting includes other martial arts, sanda is a competitive sport, boxing rules only allow attacks on the upper body, and there is no difference between martial arts and martial arts, the key is individual practice.

Of course, sanda is more practical than boxing! Obviously, there is a downside to boxing, and this shortcoming is also a lot of boxing.

The Achilles' heel of the hitter! That is, the offense and defense of boxing are almost in the upper body, and the boxers have been training for a long time under the restrictions of the rules, and finally the boxer's thinking, reaction and protection are accustomed to the upper body, and the lower body is looked at....

Sanda's advantage is that it is technically comprehensive, covering basically all aspects of fighting techniques except for the absence of ground skills. And because sanda is more popular in China, there are more professional sanda coaches to teach students in many local gyms, boxing gyms and other places. It's still good in terms of self-defense.

The disadvantages of Sanda are also prominent, as it was determined to be a point-winning game at the time of its creation, Sanda does not pay much attention to the ability to hit hard, especially the whip leg is far less lethal than the kick. In addition, to a certain extent, the comprehensiveness of sanda is both an advantage and a disadvantage, and some students have studied for half a year and still can't practice boxing in actual combat.

The advantage of Muay Thai is that it is more lethal than sanda, and it is more than enough to deal with ordinary people if you learn the techniques of kicks and elbows and knees. The disadvantages are: First of all, there are very few formal Muay Thai gyms in China, and many so-called Muay Thai coaches have changed after practicing sanda, and have never formally learned orthodox Muay Thai techniques.

Especially in some small cities, you can't find a formal Muay Thai gym at all. If you go to some gyms that sell dog meat on sheep's heads, you won't be able to learn orthodox Muay Thai techniques at all; Secondly, the technique of Muay Thai has high requirements for physical conditions, especially bone hardness, and practicing hardness is very painful, and it is difficult for many enthusiasts to stick to it; Thirdly, Muay Thai has greater lethality, so it is easier to cause injuries in actual combat training, and some enthusiasts are easily afraid after seeing others injured or themselves being hit hard; Finally, Muay Thai's technical system is relatively less complete than Sanda, there is no wrestling, ground skills, and the speed is slower than Sanda. If you play against Sanda with pure Muay Thai skills, it's easy to lose by points if you don't have an advantage in terms of striking power and resistance.

And the knee attack is very easy to crack by the opponent with a throwdown.

In short, if you are in a small city that is not very developed in terms of fighting, learning sanda is more suitable for you. If you have a good gym in your city, consider learning Muay Thai. And in my experience, whether it's sanda or Muay Thai, you have to go to a gym to learn, and it's impossible to learn formal techniques by self-study.

In addition, you said that you only have one year, and I would suggest that learning Muay Thai would be more appropriate. Muay Thai's technical system is relatively simple. Sanda's wrestling style is difficult to produce results without sparring and long-term systematic training.

And you're very lightweight, it should still be good to practice Muay Thai. Learning sanda has a big disadvantage in terms of wrestling.

Boxing is the most practical because only the hands are used