It only took 5 days for the guy to build a villa, why can the guy be so fast alone?

The reason why this guy was able to build this villa so quickly was because he built a model villaIt can be said that it is used for viewing, and it is not a villa that can be lived in in the ordinary sense at all, so let alone 5 days, if you work hard, it is possible to complete this villa in 3 days, after all, it is just a model.

And if you are careful enough, you will find that there are many netizens on the Internet who build model houses like this guyAnd they will make the process of building a house for everyone to see, if you are completely immersed in it, you will find that it is no different from building a real house, after all, they are in the process of building this house, the materials and techniques used will not be less, it can be said that it is the same as building a real house.

Then it leads to some people to develop this into a hobby of their own, and even some people will use this to achieve the purpose of making money

Of course, then again, this is another part of the current network ecological environment, after all, in a fast-paced society, many of us are not willing to spend too much time on**that very long**, and some people are tired of seeing the previous tricks,So at this time, they can only attract some very strange things, such as this kind of model house. In addition, we just need to keep a normal mind in the process of watching, and just be a spectator quietly.

This villa is not a villa in the real sense, but a villa model purchased on **, which can be put together with a lot of effort.

Because what he built was just a model, not the kind of house we lived in.

Because this is not a house, just a model of a villa, it is easy to put together.

The guy built a model bought from **, which is actually quite difficult to spell and requires a lot of effort.

The law doesn't seem to stipulate this, I guess it's in doubt.

There are no new ones at the moment, but no more land for villas has been approved.

The Ministry of Land and Resources' definition of villas: refers to single-family detached courtyards, two- to three-story forms; The floor area is quite large, and the floor area ratio is very low. The villa is a detached house form of up to three floors, including the basement floor, with an indoor garage.

Like many sub-villas and villas, such as: "four-story independent bungalows", "townhouses, double-detached townhouses", and "superimposed small high-rise houses" are all high-end residences, also called townhouses, western-style houses, not villas. The floor area ratio refers to the ratio of the total building area to the building land area.

For example, on a land of 10,000 square meters, there is a total building area of 4,000 square meters, and its plot ratio is: The general standard concept of low-density residential buildings is planned, and the floor area ratio of high-rise low-density residential buildings is not greater than; The floor area ratio of multi-storey low-density residential buildings is not greater than 1.

The answer is no, bungalows are somewhere between villas and multi-storey. This kind of house has fewer households than a multi-storey house, and it is also more complete than a multi-storey house, and the greenery is more beautiful, and there are fewer floors. Compared with the villa, the villa is a house from a vertical point of view, including the basement, the first floor to the top floor, which is a property certificate.

Whereas, a bungalow is one floor or even one floor, and there may be two households. Each floor has its own house, which is the same as multiple floors.

This needs to be prescribed by law, even for blacks and whites, there are regulations for this? There is also a special clause?? Encyclopedia should have.

There are no rules. The word villa cannot indicate the land use in the pre-sale contract of commercial housing, and the general land project establishment stage is submitted for approval to the first use, only commercial, residential, hotel (no longer available), public construction.

The owner already owns the property right after purchasing the villa, and it is the owner's personal freedom to dispose of it.

Because villas are different from apartments, apartments can be adjusted by the building ownership system, but villas can only be regulated by property management laws and regulations, and if they cause obstacles to property management, they can only be dealt with according to the Property Management Regulations.

The property law has not been introduced, which is a legal vacuum.

When the real estate developer builds the villa, it has already filed with the planning bureau, and it can no longer be demolished and rebuilt without permission, unless it is re-approved by the planning bureau to provide information for re-approval of the reconstruction work.

From the current law, it is indeed difficult to find a specific provision that prevents the owner from demolishing, but if it is to be rebuilt, rebuilt or expanded, it is not so easy, because the interests of other owners are already involved.

The urban management department is under the supervision of illegal buildings, which are buildings and structures erected within the scope of roads, green spaces and other public places and housing land without obtaining a construction project planning permit in accordance with the law. Therefore, in the actual investigation and punishment, the demolition department can only focus on "reconstruction".

If the house is demolished and rebuilt, it must be submitted to the planning department for approval. The rules for rebuilding and rebuilding houses are strict, because every legal building is part of the overall urban plan, and under normal circumstances, a good house is not demolished for no reason, usually to expand the area, or to change the structure of the house.

If you bought the villa, they don't have the right to tear it down and rebuild it without your consent. Unless the Town Planning Department thinks that your villa is not up to specification, it is possible to request a reconstruction!

The river water carries sediment and slowly settles, adding

It is not allowed by law, because the construction of a house must first go through planning permission, and without filing, it will lead to the inability to apply for warrants in the future.

Definitely not by law. After you rebuild, the design of the house, the structure, shape, and floor area of the house will change. In accordance with the law, it is necessary to re-submit for approval.

Otherwise, especially when you want to make a legal transfer, the structure and area of your new house are not the same as those on the previous property ownership certificate, and I am afraid that it will be more troublesome at that time.

Of course, if you never make a legal transfer, but the behavior is illegal, no one will take care of it if the housing authority does not come to investigate.

Haha, you can make a choice by weighing it yourself according to your actual needs.

China's administrative regulations clearly stipulate that the implementation of the policy of compensation first and relocation later, otherwise, it is illegal and can be reported to the local judicial organ.

Regulations on the Expropriation and Compensation of Houses on State-owned Land

Article 27 The implementation of housing expropriation shall be compensated first and then relocated.

Formula for calculating housing demolition and resettlement fees:

Housing demolition and resettlement expenses Relocation subsidies Temporary resettlement subsidies in the case of no swing housing Temporary resettlement subsidies beyond the transitional period Compensation for losses caused by the suspension of production or business of non-residential houses.