The old man has his own money to treat the disease, he must ask for it from future generations, wher

Updated on society 2024-04-28
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Since his old man is sick, I think it is understandable for future generations to give him money, because in the end all his money is given to them.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    There is nothing wrong with him doing this, because he is an old man himself, and his descendants are obliged to pay for his treatment.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    This question is a word. Are you sure the old man is rich? If he really has money, there is no big problem for his children to use him, just like the old man raises his children and gives his children a family, does the old man need to spend money when he is sick, and the children have to investigate whether the old man has money first, shouldn't the children take the initiative to bear this kind of thing, isn't this the time to repay the kindness of the old man's upbringing?

    If you are worried about the old man's money but ask for it from your descendants, you can think about the scene when you asked the old man for lollipops to eat when you were a child, and the old man bought it for you at that time.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    I didn't save it! His money is used to live, if he doesn't even have money, how can he guarantee the rest of his life, if you are not good enough for her, she can't live on the streets! After all, now I think it's wrong for you to pay for medical treatment!

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    I think it doesn't matter, it's right for children to spend money on the elderly's treatment. The old man's money is saved by himself, let him save it, sooner or later it will be yours.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    It stands to reason that you should not do that, but if you do, you can do it.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    I don't think there's anything wrong with that, after all, children also have the responsibility to raise them.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    I think yes, the old man is afraid that you will not raise him, so he left his back hand, the reason why he did this, he must have understood what kind of person you are, if it is good, he will not take it out, as a descendant you have to think about it and reflect on it.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    He has money to treat the disease, but he must ask his descendants to save his money there, and it is right to use this method in the future, the old man's money will be spent sooner or later.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    People have their own money to treat diseases, he must ask future generations for his own money to exist**, I think it's okay, the old man can also keep some money, well, in order to take it out in the future.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Summary. But if this behavior is too much, you say that you don't have any money on you now, give a little less money, and if there is something to help him solve, there is no need to give so much money.

    They save the money for the elderly, and if something happens, they ask us for something, what should we do.

    Hello, I am helping you to inquire about the relevant information and will reply to you immediately.

    Is it pro. He may be afraid that something will happen in the future, so he can take the money.

    But if this kind of behavior is too much, you can say that you don't have any money on you now, give the money a little more frankly, and if there is anything to help him solve it, there is no need to give Hu Xinjia so much money.

    It is my father-in-law and mother-in-law, who have two sons, and we are the eldest, and all the money given for the New Year has been saved.

    Elderly, it must be like this.

    Now I am looking at my youngest son, and I want to ask for money if I lack money, and I don't know what to do, whether to give it or not.

    You ask your youngest son to give money.

    You give the money for the elderly.

Related questions
23 answers2024-04-28

Although your ideas are realistic, they are a bit extreme, a person's moral character is not directly proportional to the poor and the rich, there are bad people among the poor, and there are good people among the rich, wouldn't it be better to find a person who is both rich and virtuous, don't care about the good or the bad. Money is important, but if you don't consider the quality of people, even if you are a rich man, you only treat you as a plaything, it will also make you unbearable. >>>More

10 answers2024-04-28

The purpose of life is to live happily, and there are different ways to be happy: maybe you will feel happy to help others, maybe you will be happy because you do what you love to do, maybe you will be happy because you contribute to your family or country. >>>More

7 answers2024-04-28

To live is to experience joys and sorrows, to be born, to be old, sick and to die, to understand what people live for? In order to achieve ideals, pursue goals, desires, and values. It's tiring and hard to live. >>>More

19 answers2024-04-28

Not necessarily, there are many ways to provide for the elderly. >>>More

33 answers2024-04-28

Actually, according to what you said, he is good to you. But maybe it's because you don't express your true feelings, making him feel insecure or cheap. In fact, I think you should know how to cherish, don't be too noisy, although the relationship has ups and downs, there are points and combinations, and it may get better and better after experiencing twists and turns, but such unreasonable troubles are not the same as going through the ups and downs together to face the test, and saying that you break up at every turn will make him feel that your feelings for him are very light, as if you can divide it, so don't always talk about the breakup and lose your temper. >>>More