Please let me know if the U701T is single core or dual core? 20

Hi! Because Xiaomi's cost performance is too high, it gives profits to customers, and other manufacturers can't compare, that's all, hehe.

A more detailed description of the problem will help netizens understand the troubles you are encountering and help you solve the problem more accurately. Thank you for supporting Xiaomi phones!

This is what attracts Xiaomi the most.

You can't see it this way, you use Task Manager, look at performance, if there are 2 blue boxes below, it's dual-core, show you my machine, so it's dual-core.

i7 2600 8G RAM Gigabyte P67 Sapphire 5770VX SSD I play this sometimes also card

Dual-core, because dual-core has two chips on a processor and only one single-core, just like a single-core intelligent processing one.

Don't you see open DNF,Enter the channel selection interface to show 4 cores is the best?,Play DNF I suggest you go and change to a 3-core,Also see if it's compatible with the motherboard architecture,Inter's performance is strong,But it's expensive! AMD's cost performance is high, you can get it with less than 4 cores and 650 at the low-end, and 3 cores are cheap, pay attention to compatibility issues, and be cautious when buying!

Dual-core good!

Single-core CPUs have been increasing the frequency of operation to improve work efficiency.

But there will be a bottleneck in the frequency, just like a water pipe is so thick, even if it flows faster and more, it is still so much, and there must not be more than two water pipes.

The dual-core CPU achieves the role of two water pipes, which not only handles more tasks without reducing the frequency, but also can assign tasks to one of the cores separately without affecting the running speed of the computer. It is more power-efficient for low tasks.

In short, the memory is dual-channel, the graphics card is crossfire technology, and even the hard disk is dual-hung, and the CPU must be multi-core!

Of course, a dual-core CPU is better than a single-core CPU

Of course, it's good to be dual-core.

By using dual-core processors on the same system footprint, customers will get a higher level of computing power and performance.

This problem really hurts, and a nuclear-free CPU is the best.

Definitely dual-core goodIt's a real pain in the ass.

You can't look at it that way.

It depends on whether the processed data can be separated, and whether it can be processed using multiple threads.

Dual-core processing data is not necessarily twice as fast as dual-core, it may be only a little faster, or it may be many times faster. Among them, there are also differences in dual-core processors, for example, Intel's dual-core technology is much stronger than AMD's dual-core, and it is more powerful for optimizing a large amount of data, and you will understand if you have played Warcraft with a large picture of more than 4M.

Hope it helps the landlord.

It's not calculated like this, the dual-core is that it can run calculations and can be calculated by multiple threads, so it's fast.

Of course, it's not dual-core, it's only in the case of multitasking that the advantage will be revealed!

No, the single-core board does not support the dual-core CPU base, and the power supply is not the same.

If you want to change it, you can only practice the motherboard and change it together.

Can it solve your problem?

In terms of computing performance, dual-core is good.

If you want to make full use of the CPU's performance, you have to look at what it is used for, the overall configuration, and what kind of operating system it uses.

In most cases, the average resource usage of PC CPU performance is less than 30%.

Dual-core is good! The first speed is fast! Second, the CPU temperature is a bit lower than that of a single core! Non-dual-core requires a little more memory than single-core. It's hardly noticeable!