-
Question 1: Use variables to replace t=(2)-x, then when x 2, t 0, the original formula = lim [t*tan( 2-t)]=lim[t*cot(t)]=lim[(t sint)*cost]=cost=1 (because t tends to 0 when lim(t sint)=1).
Question 2: When using an equivalent infinitesimal substitution x 0 (1-cosx) is equivalent to (1 2) x 2, so.
x 0 lim(x 2) (1-cosx) is equal to x 2) [(1 2) x 2]=2 and vice versa.
-
Finding the derivative, Robida's Law.
-
1: de1
2: de2
In the first question, put [(2)-x] into the denominator and write it as 1 [(2)-x], infinity is infinite, and Robida's law gives the answer 1 3 times
In the second question, since the equivalent infinitesimal of 1-cosx is x 2 2, it can be equivalent to replace the answer 2 directly
-
The second question is 2 when x approaches o, sinx approaches x, i.e. sinx 2 approaches x 2
And 1-cosx=2sin2(x2) approaches 2 times x2 times x2 equals x2 2
So the result is 2
Question 1: Replace tanx with cot(2-x) so that it becomes (2-x) tan(2-x), so the result should be 1, because when x approaches o, x approaches tanx
-
In the second question, you write 1-cosx as sinx 2 2 by lim(sinx x)=1, or lim(x sinx)=1, (all the same, when x tends to 0), so the answer is 2
The first question is a case of multiplying infinity by infinitesimal and also changing accordingly. I don't have a pen at this time, it's inconvenient to change, but I think it should be pi 2-x divided by 2, pi 4 + x 2 appears, and then tanx is also written in the form of sin (x 2) like the second question, and the result can be out.
-
Infinity Infinity, 0 0 cases, solved by Lobida's rule, is to find the derivatives separately and then compare.
Question 1: tgx, sinx, cosx
sinx=1 is not considered.
The remaining (pi 2-x) cosx derivatives up and down 1 1 1 2nd question. Derivative up and down 2x sinx and derivative 2 1 2
-
Line 3 is wrong, directly =e 2
Note: x tends to infinity, not to 0!
-
One more step, and it will be clear that the spring will collapse!
For reference, please laugh at Na Meng's family.
-
2. Use the product of the sum difference, the product of the sum difference, and the equivalent infinitesimal substitution.
Original formula = lim(n-> sin(1 n 2) + sin(2 n 2)+sin(n/n^2)]*2sin(1/2n^2)/2sin(1/2n^2)
lim(n->∞2sin(1/2n^2)sin(1/n^2)+2sin(1/2n^2)sin(2/n^2)+.2sin(1/2n^2)sin(n/n^2)]/(2*1/2n^2)
lim(n->∞n^2
lim(n->∞n^2
lim(n->∞2sin[(n+1)/2n^2]sin(n/2n^2)*n^2
lim(n->∞2*[(n+1)/2n^2]*(1/2n)*n^2
lim(n->∞n^2+n)/2n^2
-
These two questions have the same meaning, (2) the denominator is multiplied by the root number (x-2) + the root number under the root number 2
The next question is the same.
If you have to choose one of the two, then choose the second, the first salary is too low, now 600 January who is still doing it, the second after all, you still have some foundation, don't be afraid of failure, how do you know you can't do it if you haven't tried? Even if you don't succeed, you can find another job, 1000 yuan a month of work is still a lot now!
Isn't it 1704 kinds?,I'm not very good at math.,Especially permutations and combinations.,If there's any error.,Everyone points it out.,Thank you.。 >>>More
As can be seen from the title, the real temperature is 0° when the thermometer reading is 5°, and 100° at 95°, so the temperature difference of each grid is 100 90°=10 9°, so (1) when the reading is 23°, the actual temperature is. >>>More
The first thing I think about is this: when it comes to language writing, some people are either sullen or sad. Because that's the most headache thing. >>>More
6 hours. The 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. hour and minute hands should coincide between 8:40 a.m. and 8:45 a.m., without counting the exact minute or second of the coincidence; The 2 p.m. and 3 p.m. hour and minute hands coincide between 2:10 p.m. and 15 p.m., and they don't count the exact minute and second of the coincidence.