How to refute copycats is not innovation

Good debate topic Personally, I am also more supportive of copycats.

The reason is due to the weak performance of national brands.

I once joked with a friend that if half of the people in China bought a copycat machine from him, then his company might be able to surpass Nokia in a year

The primitive accumulation of capital is all bloody, and although it was born in the early days of capitalism, it is applicable to any society today. So can shanzhai culture be regarded as the early stage of China's brand culture construction?

China is a China with Chinese characteristics, so the cottage culture is deeply imprinted in China, and the market economy in the early stage of reform in the 80s almost "died" from the smuggling culture at that time, which ultimately proves that those who take care of the overall situation cannot be afraid of losing the summary. Isn't the cottage in front of you the same as the rampant smuggling back then? My personal opinion is that although the cottage culture is not elegant, whether it can be guided by the situation, I believe that when someone recalls the cottage culture in the future, they will find that this is only a stage of development.

Sometimes if everyone says that a woman is a b, then she is a b, if no one says then she is still a woman from a good family, regardless of whether the woman is really a b.

First of all, you first ask what a copycat is.

I was asking him what the object of the cottage was.

Asked him about the characteristics of cottage. Let him go back one by one.

As long as you are sure of the model object of the copycat, you can fight back! Because when he refers to the exemplary object of the copycat. That is, he admits that the copycat is exemplary! Just let him say that the main body of the cottage is the model!

Actually, to be honest, your trap is not so easy to set up. Because you never know what will happen to you with the person you're debating with in a flash of inspiration! So in the end, it's up to you to play on the spot.

Simple! You just can't compare the apple to the golden apple!

The law should not provide for a direct refutation of the other party, if there is no copycat product, then what are we using now.

Edition? Is it true that every family court has the money to buy a 1,000-5,000 mobile phone? There are no copycats, it is estimated that there is nothing good to use in China, and China's good products in the world are Meizu Lenovo, and the rest can be ignored Dare to ask if you have used copycats.

I just finished this debate.

The other party will first confuse the definition of cottage culture and define it as a kind of imitation of innovation, and what you need to grasp is that copycat is just imitation, innovation is not called copycat.

Second, the other party will deliberately associate cottage culture with grassroots culture, saying that it is a kind of grassroots class awakening and the embodiment of the civilian spirit, and you need to explain that the creation of civilian culture is not cottage culture.

Fourth, it is easy to argue that the other party will say that existence is reasonable when there is no problem.

In the whole debate competition, you are arguing around the definition of copycat, and the other party will deliberately confuse it, you must be sober, copycat is pure imitation, shoddy de plagiarism. It is recommended that you take a look at the 2010 International Collegiate Debate Conference of Wuhan University vs. National Chengchi University, and play word games with your opponent and learn the debate of Wuhan University, and the opponent will easily run with you.

In the end, after so many fights, and you don't have a reward, just give me the best.

Opposite: Counterfeit goods disrupt the market order and are not conducive to legitimate market competition. The impact of counterfeit and shoddy products on the market is a big problem at present, which damages the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and should be banned.

Shouldn't you stop yourself as a peacemaker who sees your legitimate rights and interests being undermined?

Positive: We can't object to the things favored by most people, he is also a product of the development of the commodity era, his appearance shows that the real ** is too high for most people, and the copycat machine can make people accept and satisfy people's vanity. Just like the police and thieves, shouldn't all thieves be damned, and can't they reflect on the reasons for this decline in social mores?

How can conniving copycat products be innovative.

Recently, there has been a suspicious view in vogue. Copycat products used to be like rats crossing the street, but now they have turned into "stars", "culture", and anti-monopoly "warriors". Can this really be the case?

The word shanzhai in Cantonese means small factories and workshops without licenses and difficult to enter formal channels, and by extension, it is synonymous with piracy, plagiarism and imitation. Recently, many ** are paying attention to the phenomenon of copycats: more than half of the netizens who participated in the survey are optimistic about the copycat culture and believe that it should be allowed to develop; The popularity of counterfeit products reflects the public's psychological need for fashion and low prices.

Sympathy and support for the copycat phenomenon seem to have prevailed.

The default copycat phenomenon is actually a blurred line: if you don't entertain yourself for the purpose of making profits, and make people laugh, no matter how copycat you are, there is nothing wrong with copycats; However, once this line is crossed, there is no evasion of its "original sin": suspected illegality and infringement.

The popularity of copycat products reflects the helplessness and weakness in the protection of intellectual property rights. If intellectual property rights are not effectively protected for a long time, on the one hand, it will dampen the motivation and enthusiasm of the entire society for innovation, and on the other hand, opportunistic and contemptuous of the legal system will be regarded as reasonable, legal, and accustomed to it.

The products that have been copied almost without exception come from large companies and brands. Imagine, the products that have invested heavily in research and development have been copied as soon as they are introduced to the market, and the cost has not been recovered and has fallen to the "cabbage price". An enterprise that ignores the accumulation and reserve of technology, and the product lacks real innovation ability, is likely to collapse in case of risk.

From the development and growth of innovative enterprises to the construction of the innovation incentive mechanism of the whole society, the effective protection of intellectual property rights is inseparable.

The public accepts copycat products, mainly because they are cheap. So there is a view: "Consumers have long hated monopolies in all their forms, but they can't help it."

Pursuing copycats is a kind of helpless countermeasure. "Monopolies, especially those that do not rely on technological innovation, are indeed hateful. Previously, there was a saying that "how black the genuine disc is, how crazy the piracy is".

But having said that, the premise of breaking the monopoly and enabling consumers to get a reasonable dissolution must be legitimate competition and protect the legitimate rights and interests of others.

Copycat products generally do not engage in research and development, only imitate the style and function of brand products, and at the same time evade supervision and do not pay value-added tax and sales tax, so as to earn huge profits. For copycat products without a fixed place of production and a clear manufacturer, only by flexible distribution means and cost control can obtain huge profits, is there any negligence and dereliction of duty in the relevant departments?

The development of an enterprise and the progress of a country are inseparable from technological progress and innovation. Copycat products are like doping athletes. Only with a clear attitude and effective containment can we safeguard fairness and promote scientific and technological innovation and civilization progress.

There are two completely different attitudes towards the "shanzhai economy": supporters believe that "shanzhai" is the embodiment of the spirit of the common people, and some people even call it "shanzhai" a postmodern peasant uprising", which is an expansion of marginal innovation ability; Opponents believe that "cottage culture" is just a beautiful coat to beautify "cottage products", and in the bones, "cottage culture" is the same as "cottage products", a manifestation of lack of creativity and self-confidence. The destructive power brought by a disorderly market is unimaginable, and if the copycat products are used as an excuse to develop without restraint, then the use of the law to maintain the market will be something that will happen in the near future.

When the "copycat economy" becomes popular and is sung high, the result will inevitably be the collapse of China's growing "knowledge-based society" and further undermine the world's confidence in China's blind production.

I feel that as the opposite, we can divide the copycat culture mentioned by the positive side into grassroots culture and real copycat culture. Grass-based liquid root culture should be supported, while real copycat culture should be resolutely opposed.

Because the copycats with real and bad are often associated with rent theft and imitation and infringement. When it comes to the fundamentals, cottage is to slightly transform the fruits of other people's labor and take them for yourself. This is an immoral act.

The so-called copycat culture supported by the positive side should be grassroots culture, not cottages.

So, if you want to debate, you should start with the concept first, so that the positive side loses one step ahead in the concept.

First, copycat culture is plagiarism culture. They have nothing of their own, and blind imitation has no future, and they will eventually become slaves, or they will perish; Second, copycat culture discourages true innovation. Some people say that the monopoly profits of some high-tech industries are too high, but they also have to bear the cost of development, and copycat products squeeze their profit margins, reduce market share and sales, so that these manufacturers can not invest more money in the development of new products.

In a sense, copycat culture hits innovation. In general, copycat culture is suspected of infringement, and the side game with the law has exposed the lack of innovation in our high-end industries and elites, including the lack of motivation and mechanism for technological innovation and cultural innovation. In the eyes of copycats, you are just imitating, you imitate foreign brands, and I imitate them; I am imitating him and you, why can't I do what you do?

I'm better than you. You spend money in vain, but I don't spend money to imitate. The difference is that you are a legal imitation, and I am not a legal imitation.

Finally, the Internet, mobile phones, newspapers and even local radio and television stations and other media have also played a great role. In fact, a ** has become a cottage, an independent kingdom, and countless cottages have appeared in the mu and the online world. It seems to be allowed to be spoofed, copied, and quoted.

Due to the persecution of the market economy in pursuit of low cost and high returns and the many loopholes in various industries, the society is full of opportunistic speculation, and the long-term inability to pirate and infringe on the problems of piracy and infringement, as well as the objective existence of some corruption, some people's inhumanity to the rich, some social injustices, the gap between the rich and the poor, polarization, etc., also make the copycats bold and unscrupulous. Therefore, in a certain sense, the cottage culture is also the distorted and deformed embodiment of the public opinion of a certain sedan chair, so it is not surprising that it has to be closed to the cheers and acceptance of countless civilians. Nowadays, many piracy and spoofs are based on the grounds of 'copycats', and the most terrible thing is that the so-called copycats are under the banner of folk culture and grassroots, but they do not do the same thing at all.

Under the banner of 'shanzhai', infringement and counterfeiting and theft have gradually moved from the dark to the light, from the niche to the public, and from the fringe to the mainstream, which is the double sadness of China's legal system and cultural construction.

Tricky question: (It seems to be more difficult) is nothing more than comparing the other person to the original creator, and then asking from this perspective whether you can accept the ...... of your idea being stolen by othersIf the other person says to accept ......That's more ......It is better to limit the presumed identity of the other party to increase the ...... of the plight of the pirated party

Cottage: In ancient times, it was a mountain villa with fences and other defensive fortifications; Generally refers to mountain villages; In the old days, the green forest heroes occupied the mountain camp. This term refers to a manufacturer of goods suspected of counterfeiting or counterfeiting third-party goods. In layman's terms, it is piracy, cloning, imitation, etc., which are used in the entertainment industry.

Copycat mobile phone: It is a joking name for a miscellaneous mobile phone. It is a mobile phone made by a small factory such as a handicraft workshop that does not have its own technology and relies entirely on assembling products.

Its appearance is usually very similar to the popular products of some well-known first-line brands, and there are no more formal brands, and some are even branded with nokir and samsing. These phones are often referred to as copycat phones, copycats.

Positive: 1. The purpose of the cottage is not to imitate, but to mock those who think they are the mainstream authorities in an imitation way, to declare their own existence and difference. It embodies the voices of the most ordinary and grassroots people, who declare in this unique way: I don't accept it!

2. The cottage is only for entertainment to a large extent, and in many cases it is commercialized, but the value of the cottage itself cannot be denied.

3. The emergence of cottage products has its rationality, such as low price, complete functions on the surface, and service levels that are similar to those of large manufacturers. Shanzhai products are building their own brands and opening up low-consumption customer groups.

The copycat mobile phone industry is based on the infringement of the intellectual property rights of large enterprises, which can be said to be a very serious violation and infringement. The damage caused by this is not divided into the hall and the mountain. If you connive at the infringement of copycat mobile phones because you support the spirit of copycats, pretending to be Chi Zhong is like picking up two board axes with Li Kui and cutting off your head when you see it, whether it is your own family or an enemy, you will cut it first and then talk about it.