In the debate of legal cases, how should the opposing side argue, and what is the focus of the discu

Statutory duties must be, and cannot be done without legal authorization. Both pros and cons can be argued from here. Of course, the civilian police have an obligation to protect the population, but the obligation is not unlimited. As for whether or not there is moral adjustment, everyone can understand it differently.

As long as there is a controversial topic, it can become a debate topic.

Square: 1If a person often has lies in his mouth to deceive others, over time, he will lose people's trust.

2.The "lie" itself is dark, and the white lie itself is falsehood. Although he took off the cheongsam worn by the beggar, he still could not escape the essence of his lie, and a lie meant deception, and thus hindered integrity.

The starting point of a white lie is good, but often once this lie is exposed, the damage to the other party will be deeper. 3.In my opinion, distrusting others is not only irresponsible to oneself, but also disrespectful to others, and even to others, causing losses to the interests of the collective.

The most important thing is to lose the trust of others. 4.Zi said:

People have no faith, and they don't know what they can do. "I think that if people don't pay attention to the use of letters, they will have no place in society, and they will not be able to do anything. A "lie" is called a "lie" because it is a false, untrue, and deceitful word.

If a person often has lies in his mouth to deceive others, over time, he will lose people's trust. 5.Another point is that if you tell a lie, it may be used many more lies to round that lie, and there is a high probability that lying becomes a habit, lying, it's like a snowball, it will get bigger and bigger.

Opposite: 1White lies are beautiful, and when we tell small lies in moderation for the sake of the happiness and hope of others, lies become understanding, respect, and tolerance.

Who doesn't want to be understood, respected, and tolerated? So, I think it's still necessary to tell a few white lies in our lives. 2.

White lies, all kinds of white lies from the starting point and result, are all to protect the other party's emotions, maintain the other party's mental health and pleasure, and are a kind of humanistic spirit. Because of the existence of white lies, the world will become better, warmer and more harmonious, and the world will be full of sunshine. 3.

When a terminally ill patient is sentenced to death by doctors, his parents, children, and all his relatives will not directly tell him: "Life cannot be saved" or "At most, how long can I live in this world?" They all use white lies to encourage patients and let him cooperate with doctors**, and the opposing party can't blame these people for being dishonest, right?

Although these are all truths, who would be so cruel as a judge to sentence a prisoner to death, telling the truth to his relatives who are already sick?

The basic procedures of the debate method include determining the appropriate topic of debate, clarifying the division of labor among students, determining the rules of debate, establishing the grading criteria, and selecting the appropriate place and time for the debate.

<> process: Debate competition procedure (carried out by the chair).

1. Opening remarks.

2. The team members will enter the venue, introduce the participating teams and their positions, introduce the participating team members, and introduce the judges and their commentators.

3. The game begins.

4. The jury will withdraw from the review after submitting the score sheet.

5. The judging panel will sit down and comment on the guests to evaluate the event.

6. Announce the results of the competition (including the best judge) and the presentation stage.

Argument (3 minutes).

The opposing side will speak (3 minutes).

2. Cross-examination stage.

1) The opposing side asks questions in three arguments.

2) Debate and ask questions.

3) The opposing party argues and asks questions.

4) Debate and ask questions.

5) The opposing side argues and asks questions.

6) Debate and ask questions.

7) Three arguments of the opposing side.

30 seconds per person, 3 minutes in total).

3. Summary of cross-examination.

Square 2 resolution (1 minute 30 seconds).

Reverse 2 (1 minute 30 seconds).

4. From the bridge to the debate stage.

The pros and cons speak first, then the cons speak, and the pros and cons take turns to speak. (4 minutes each).

5. Summary stage.

The opposing side's four arguments are summarized (four minutes of Min Zheng).

Concluding arguments (4 minutes).

Time. 1. Presentations are 6 minutes in total.

1) 3 minutes each for the pros and cons to defend themselves.

2. The cross-examination stage lasts for 6 minutes.

1) It takes 10 seconds to ask a question and 20 seconds.

2) 3 minutes for the second argument, 8 minutes for the free debate and 4 minutes for each side.

4. The summary stage takes 8 minutes, and each side takes 4 minutes.

Rules. 1. Rules for cross-examination.

1) Each team member's speech should include two parts: questions. Be concise and ask clear questions (limit to one question at a time).

2) When the other party asks a question, the party being asked must not evade or refute it.

2. Rules of free debate.

1) Free debate speeches must alternate between the two teams, first by one player from the positive side and then by one member of the opposing team, and both sides take turns until time runs out.

2) The time spent by each team is cumulatively calculated, and when one team finishes speaking, the time spent by the other team will be calculated.

3) In the total time, there is no limit to the order, number and time of each team's speeches.

4) If one team's time has run out, the other team can either give up speaking or take turns speaking until time runs out. Waiver of a statement does not affect scoring.

3. During the debate, the parties shall not read out the manuscript prepared in advance or display the figures prepared in advance, but may present the abstracts of the books or newspapers and periodicals cited.

4. During the competition, the debater shall not leave his seat and shall not disturb the speech of the opponent or his own debater.

4) If one team's time has run out, the other team can either give up speaking or take turns speaking until time runs out.

Debate is a basic procedural right of the parties, and Article 10 of the Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China clearly stipulates this, that is, the parties enjoy the right to debate in administrative litigation. The so-called debate refers to the fact and legal issues of the case under the auspices of the parties, each stating their own propositions and opinions, refuting each other, and further distinguishing the truth and falsehood and right and wrong.

The principle that the parties have the right to debate is the embodiment of the democratic nature of administrative litigation in China and the requirement of litigation fairness, and this principle mainly contains the following contents: the right to debate is the basic litigation right of the parties. Plaintiffs, defendants, co-litigants, and third parties all enjoy the right to debate, and the right to debate is the basic litigation right of the above-mentioned parties, and adjudicators should exercise their command functions to ensure that the parties fully exercise their right to debate.

In terms of the content of the debate, the parties have the right to debate the issues of administrative substantive law, administrative procedure law, and administrative litigation procedure. The parties have the right to argue orally or in writing. Debate is conducted in the first-instance procedure, the second-instance procedure, the trial supervision and weighing procedure, and the enforcement procedure.

Article 198 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China: During the course of trial, facts and evidence related to conviction and sentencing shall be investigated and debated. With the permission of the presiding judge, the public prosecutor, parties, defenders, and litigants may express their opinions on evidence and the circumstances of the case, and may debate with each other. After the presiding judge announces the conclusion of the debate, the defendant has the right to make a final statement.

Jin's conduct constituted the crime of embezzlement. Wang's borrowing of Jin's ID card to deposit money was based on a relationship of trust. It was under this relationship that Jin held and managed Wang's property.

A custodian relationship was established between Jin and Wang. Objectively, Jin illegally took possession of the property of others in custody for himself, and the amount was huge, and refused to return it. The subjective aspect is intentional and has the purpose of illegally taking possession of another person's property.

Jin's conduct meets the criminal composition of the crime of embezzlement.

With regard to ordinary embezzlement, Article 1 of the Criminal Law states that the property of another person in custody is illegally taken possession and the amount is relatively large, and the property is refused to be returned. The so-called "custody on behalf of others" is generally considered to arise in two situations:

One is based on entrustment (in a broad sense), such as leasing, guarantee, etc.; The second is based on causeless management. In this case, there was no custody on behalf of the client. From the perspective of the legality of crimes, the possibility of constituting the crime of embezzlement is excluded.

Jin's conduct should be unjust enrichment.

The crime of embezzlement refers to the act of illegally taking possession of another person's property, forgotten property, or buried property for one's own custody for the purpose of illegal possession, and refusing to return it to the owner of a relatively large amount.

Wang used Jin's ID card to apply for a passbook and deposited it in the bank, which can be regarded as handing it over to Jin for safekeeping.

In this detail, the bank is negligent, the bank is a real-name system, and no one else can handle the account on behalf of the bank).