Is it a crime to take care of the elderly because I am sick and take care of the elderly and die une

It depends on the fact that the death of the old man is indeed an accidental natural death, so he is not guilty, and if he intentionally injures or fails to fulfill his responsibilities to cause the death of the old man, he is responsible.

This situation should be innocent, and the accidental death is not man-made, but the children's conscience is unbearable.

Whether you are legally responsible in this case depends on whether he killed or **. If it is an accident, you are not legally responsible. If there is evidence of homicide or **, then a public prosecution will be initiated, and the court will decide whether you are legally responsible.

You have said that the old man died accidentally, and as long as there is no conclusive evidence that your sister caused the accident, she is not guilty.

As long as there is no subjective death of your sister, there is no problem, there is no excessive speech, and there is no physical action conflict, there is no responsibility.

There will be no guilt. Because you've done your best! And isn't he an accident? As long as you don't mean it. Or is it not trying.

What kind of words are you talking about, and those who help are still guilty! If this is not intentional and not taken care of, then there is no way, who will dare to help in the future? Aren't you harming anyone who says this? Will you ever have friends in the future? There won't be.

Died unexpectedly, this is all guilty, which is the one who is innocent? And she's helping, you don't thank you and think she didn't take care of her, it's really chilling!

My sister is sick and takes care of me by herself, what kind of words should I use to thank him You are sick and my sister takes care of you by herself, you can thank her from the bottom of your heart, it will feel very real and touching. For example, when I was sick, I was really touched to have my sister to accompany and take care of me, thank you for having you!

Isn't what you said a little excessive, it's your old man and your sister's old man, do you think your sister will kill her own relatives?

What is the common feeling of birth, old age, sickness and death?

You ask a caregiver to take care of the elderly, and a de facto employment relationship has been formed between you, and you will not go to jail if you have no money to compensate for the accidental death of the caregiver, but the family of the deceased can apply to the county-level people's court to freeze your bank account and property or auction the real estate to repay, and the shortfall can be recovered for life.

Huang, a laid-off worker, had been unemployed at home for more than half a year, and in January 2010, the agency helped him connect with a nurse position. After 3 days of probation, Huang got along well with the two elderly people, so the two parties agreed that Huang would go to Li's house to take care of the daily life of Li's parents with a monthly salary of 900 yuan.

On May 7, 2010, Huang had lunch and drank wine with Li's family. At about 16 o'clock that day, Huang suddenly felt unwell and was sent to the hospital by Li's family, but died after rescue.

The three plaintiffs, Huang's wife, son, and daughter, believe that Huang died while engaged in labor during the defendant's employment, and his death caused them great mental harm, and hereby request the court to order Li to compensate the three plaintiffs for death compensation, funeral expenses, and mental injury solatium totaling 10,000 yuan.

Li believes that his father is an old man in his 80s, who has been ill for a long time and needs nursing, and is a person with limited civil capacity and cannot be the subject of civil litigation. Moreover, there was no employment relationship between Li and Huang, and the court was requested to reject the claims of the three plaintiffs.

After the trial, the Macun District Court held that a de facto service contract relationship had been formed between Huang and Li, that Huang had provided housekeeping services to Li before his death, and that Li, as the recipient of the service, could give the relatives of the deceased Huang a certain amount of economic compensation and support 20,000 yuan as appropriate.

The judge presiding over the case at the Macun District Court said that because Li's parents were old and in poor health, they needed to be taken care of for a long time. According to the intermediary, Huang went to Li's house to work as a domestic service and take care of the daily life of the two, and it was precisely because the two of them needed someone to take care of them that they hired a caregiver. Because if they can take care of themselves, they don't need to hire a caregiver.

Fault liability applies to domestic service contracts, and the parties have the burden of proving their own claims. Before Huang's death, he drank alcohol at noon, and his drinking behavior may have caused the onset of the disease, and he was at fault and should be held responsible for his own fault. The medical certificate of death from the hospital could not show the defendant's fault and the extent of the fault in the plaintiff's death, so the three plaintiffs' claims that the defendant should bear the liability for compensation have no factual and legal basis and should not be supported by the court.

However, a de facto service contract relationship was formed between Huang and Li, in which Huang provided domestic service to Li and received corresponding remuneration, and Li paid corresponding remuneration after accepting his services. According to the principle of fair responsibility, Huang provided domestic service for Li during his lifetime, and Li, as the recipient of the service, could give certain financial compensation to the family of the deceased.

No, it won't. You are only liable for monetary compensation, and you will not be sentenced to jail, but you will pay a little for the time being, and you can owe the rest first and apply for social assistance.

If you look for the caregiver personally, you won't go to jail, at most you will lose some money, if you find it through the company, the company will be responsible.

If you help him and he dies in the end, you still have to bear the corresponding responsibility, so there are some things that you can't help.

If the person you helped dies, you don't do that, because you are the one who helped him, and you didn't cause his death.

There is no sin in this with you, because it was not caused by you, so don't take it too seriously.

I helped an old man, and then the old man died, am I guilty?

You are not guilty.

You helped the old man, and after the old man died, you didn't fall asleep, you should be in your heart. Feel glad that you have helped him.

After I helped him, the old man died. Am I guilty, and why are you guilty? He should thank you for helping him, and his family should thank you.

The key to you is how to help him, he died in **, so we don't know much about your situation.

An old man, after you help him, the old man dies, it depends on the circumstances under which he died, whether you are guilty or not.

A you old man, I helped him pass, the old man died, am I guilty, I didn't get drunk, you take care of her, that's what is guilty.

I don't think my sister is responsible, after all, it's a son, my mother can't always let my sister take care of it, it's only right for a son to take care of his mother!

My sister wants to have surgery, this is also something that can't be helped, it must be required by the doctor, my sister doesn't need to be responsible for her brother's illness and hospitalization because she took care of her mother, and she didn't deliberately leave it alone.

Every family has a scripture that is difficult to read, and such a situation appears in many families, and it is up to the family to solve it by themselves, depending on the situation, and coordinate with each other, and no matter how hard it is, it will pass.

You are sick, the question you ask is very unreasonable, the younger sister has no responsibility, supporting the elderly is the obligation of the children, and it cannot be exempted because the elder brother is sick, and the elder brother still has the responsibility to support the younger siblings.

You are sick, you take care of yourself, what does your mother have to do with your sister? Your own mother takes care of your sister by herself, can't she have surgery?

Do relatives want their sister to compensate, no matter what, children have the obligation to support their parents, the obligation not only refers to money, but also to take care of when sick, usual food and clothing, and there is no way for my sister to have surgery, why didn't my brother take care of my mother at that time.

What's the responsibility for this?,No.,Special treatment for special circumstances.,My sister doesn't care.,And there's no way to manage it.。

This is also a last resort, don't blame yourself. I wish you all a happy life soon.

It is very difficult, and it is impossible to determine whose responsibility it is, so it can only be said that we must do our part of filial piety and not forget our roots.

Of course, there is responsibility, and children have the responsibility to support the elderly.

The sister herself can't take care of herself for an objective reason, although the children are obliged to be filial to the elderly, out of this objective fact that she is not capable of her sister.

Hello, normal death, no responsibility. If the nursing home does not take good care of it, for example: falling from sleep, or falling to death while walking, the nursing home is responsible and will lose money. Compensation is based on the negligence of the staff or the negligence of the nursing home.

In the event of a natural death, there is no need to be responsible. If death is caused by inadequate care, the nursing home is responsible, but the staff is not directly responsible. Nursing homes may impose appropriate penalties on staff, and fines generally may not exceed 40% of wages.

If it is caused by malice, then it is the criminal liability of the staff, and the nursing home is jointly and severally liable.

When an elderly person dies in a nursing home, does he always have to be responsible for his work? When an elderly person dies in a nursing home, do the staff hold people responsible? If it is a normal cause, there is no need to be responsible, and if it is a death caused by the negligence of a staff member, then it is responsible.

Hello friends! I think this is a clear cause of death, 1. If the elderly in the nursing home die normally, the staff does not need to be responsible. 2. If the elderly in the nursing home die due to the dereliction of duty of the staff, the staff must be responsible.

The elderly in the nursing home died, should the staff be responsible? As long as it is not caused by the negligence of the staff member, they are generally not responsible. Because the elderly are already in poor physical condition, they are at risk of dying at any time.

If the elderly in the nursing home die naturally, the staff does not need to be responsible, and if it is an unnatural death, then the relevant personnel must be held responsible.

Some of the elderly in the nursing home are going to be sick to care for the elderly, or some are recovering for health care, so it depends on what caused the death, if it is an unnatural death, the staff must be responsible, and the responsibility of the nursing home may be greater.

It's hard to say, the old man in the nursing home died, it depends on how he died and whether the staff is responsible, if it is a normal birth, old age, sickness and death, the staff is not responsible, if it is an accident, then the staff is responsible.

If the elderly person in the nursing home dies, if it is a normal death, the staff must not be responsible, because the cause of death of the elderly may be due to illness or other things.

The people in the nursing home are basically the elderly, and if it is a normal birth, old age, sickness and death, then the staff does not need to be responsible.

I have given this love, you don't have to be polite, the festival is smooth, the old man goes all the way!

To put it mildly, it's good not to be able to rely on you.

Although the title deed is registered in the names of both husband and wife, in the event of the death of the husbandWhether the wife can change the house to her own name and take full ownership of the house cannot be generalized, but needs to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

First of all, one thing to be clear isBecause the title deed is registered in the names of both husband and wife, the ownership of the house is jointly owned by the husband and wife, which is the joint property of the husband and wife, and not the personal property of one of the spouses.

In the event of the husband's death, the half of the property in the husband's name becomes the husband's inheritance。If the husband makes a will that the wife inherits half of the property in his name, then the other heirs have no right to claim the husband's estate, and the wife can take full ownership of the house according to the will.

But,If the husband did not make a will during his lifetime, then after the death of the husband, for the half of the share of the property in the husband's name,It needs to be dealt with in accordance with legal succession

According to the provisions of the Civil Code, the first legal heirs of a deceased husband include his spouse, parents and children.

Therefore,If the husband and wife have no children and both of the husband's parents have died, the wife is the only legal heir, the wife can take full ownership of the house by inheritance.

But,If both spouses have children, or if the husband's parents have not all died。Then the children born to both parties and the husband's parents are the legal heirs of the husband's estate.

For the half of the real estate in the husband's name, it needs to be jointly inherited by all the husband's legal heirs, and under normal circumstances, it is divided equally, and the wife cannot obtain full ownership of the house

Therefore, if the husband intends to give his share of the property to his wife during his lifetime, it is best to make a will during his lifetime to designate his share of the property and other inheritance to be inherited by the wife. In this way, after the death of the husband, the wife can obtain the ownership of the husband's estate in accordance with the law, thus avoiding disputes with other heirs over the inheritance of the estate. Moreover, this will of the husband is best notarized.

If the elderly have a fixed deposit and are unwell and cannot withdraw it, their children and grandchildren can withdraw it on their behalf, whether it is a bank card or a passbook. As long as you write an identity certificate, let him give him the ID card of yourself and the elderly, and let the banker see your certificate, you can directly withdraw the money.

If it is a fixed deposit on a bank card, the amount is less than 50,000 yuan, and it can be withdrawn at the bank ATM with the bank card; If the amount is more than 50,000 yuan, you need to take your ID card and bank card to the bank counter to withdraw. If it is a fixed passbook and deposit certificate, whether it is due or not due, the withdrawal requires the valid ID card of the ** person and the head of the household, and it needs to be withdrawn at the bank counter. In addition, passbooks and deposit receipts cannot be withdrawn from other places, and passbooks can be withdrawn from any local deposit bank, while deposit receipts can only be collected from the opening bank.

A fixed deposit, also known as a "certificate of deposit", is a deposit in which the bank and the depositor agree on the term and interest rate in advance at the time of deposit, and withdraw the principal and interest after maturity.

So, what happens to the savings that the family doesn't know about after the death of the person? First of all, we need to know that the bank will definitely not take the initiative to notify the family, because the bank has no obligation to do so. And, the most critical problem is that with so many depositors, the bank simply doesn't know about the depositor's death, so it can't tell the family.

In fact, regardless of whether the depositor dies or not, if it is a deposit that has not been claimed for a long time, it will be converted into a dormant account by the bank after certain conditions are met. The condition here refers to "no transactions have occurred in the current savings account for more than 15 years, and no customer has withdrawn the time deposit account for more than 20 years".

If the depositor or legal heir still does not come to handle the withdrawal business within two years, the bank will include it in the "non-operating income" and use it at its own discretion. Therefore, if you simply forget that there is a deposit in the bank, as long as the depositor's family members of the deceased remember it, they can go to the bank and withdraw the deposit at any time. However, it should be noted here that when the family of the deceased goes to the bank to handle the withdrawal business, they must bring the deposit certificate, the death certificate of the deceased, and the notarized relevant inheritance materials before the deceased's deposit can be withdrawn.

Otherwise, the bank will not directly give the deposit to the family of the deceased.