Does Pakistan have an anti missile system, and what is going on with the Indian anti ballistic missi

Pakistan does not have an anti-missile system. The Pakistan Air Defense Command was established in 1975 and is located at Chakra Air Base near Rawalpindi and is responsible for the control, monitoring and coordination of Pakistan-wide airspace. The Air Defense Command is built in bunkers 5 to 10 meters underground, with four rows of consoles inside, and about 20 to 25 operators are responsible for the operation of the entire command.

The Command consists of four regional operations centres, each of which controls seven control and reporting centres. The headquarters of the four regions are in Quetta, Sargotha, Karachi and Peshawar. Pakistan has a well-knit radar intelligence network that can obtain information from civilian air traffic control radars.

The core of the Pakistani air defense system is 3 squadrons of F-16A B. These aircraft perform well. But the F-16A B lacks long-range air-to-air missiles, and other aircraft are not equipped with modern radars.

Pakistan originally wanted to buy 40 Mirage 2000-5s, but its wish was not realized. Pakistan has already begun to improve the Mirage and J-7 and has purchased the Thunder. It is hoped that their all-weather volley capabilities will be improved, which will allow Pakistan to make a leap forward in overall air defense.

Pakistan has very few surface-to-air missiles, only 6-8 squadrons of Sidewinder anti-aircraft missiles and one squadron of Hongqi-2 missiles. The Pakistan Air Force has 43 anti-aircraft artillery regiments, and the reserve forces also have some highland air defense **, ranging in caliber from 12 7 mm to 37 mm. These anti-aircraft guns can only constitute a certain deterrent to aircraft, but they cannot do anything against missiles.

Compared to the anti-aircraft missiles and fighters equipped with India, Pakistan's air defense system, despite its good coordination, is not advanced enough.

No, there is no real ballistic missile defense system in any country other than the United States.

No.. China does not yet have an anti-missile system in the true sense of the word.

In fact, China also has an anti-missile system, but it is just a secret. And many big countries have wheels, such as the United Kingdom, France, etc. Most nuclear** countries will have their own anti-missile systems, but they vary.

When the enemy's nuclear missile strikes, it launches an anti-missile missile to detonate a nuclear bomb near the target missile to destroy the target. However, the United States and Russia have taken the lead in developing conventional anti-missile systems, and China has also studied them, but I don't know what the situation is now!

India's development of anti-missile is mainly a conspiracy behind the United States, just like the anti-missile defense in Eastern Europe. Slam on. Its purpose is to hold China and Russia hostage. China knows that the defeated country has not developed anti-missiles.

After the 90s of the last century, shaken by the big show of the "Patriot" missiles in the Gulf War and the continuous development of ballistic missile technology of its old adversary, Pakistan, India germinated the idea of establishing an anti-missile system and upgraded its air defense network to an air defense system with a certain anti-missile capability. To this end, India has successively purchased and leased the S-300 and "Antey-2500" air defense and anti-missile systems from Russia, and purchased the "Green Pine" warning radar in the "Arrow" anti-missile system from Israel. India's Russian-made S 300 improved version has a maximum range of 100 kilometers and is a very effective anti-missile defense system.

At present, India has six sets of S-300 air defense missiles and 150 sets of "Antey" 2500 anti-tactical ballistic missile systems, as well as related command, control, and communications equipment.

India wants to achieve the role of the S-30 with its Su-300MKI 400. So, only the S-300 and "Antey-2500" anti-aircraft and anti-missile systems were leased, and they were not bought back!

Although China already has it, it has not yet announced that it has an anti-missile system. Although India is also aware of this, it just refuses to admit it, which is obviously a "ostrich policy" and a self-deceptive idea!

At present, there is still a certain gap between China's anti-missile and radar systems and those of the United States and the Soviet Union, but the technology of India, Pakistan, and other countries still does not pose a threat to China. China's current anti-missile technology is mature, it has its own cruise missiles, and it can be said that there are no big problems with the defense of the homeland.

He should have only mentioned the Western democratic camp, not the Soviet Union and Pakistan.

Although I don't know if Pakistan has anti-missile capabilities)

You don't know that this is China's national policy??? Ah San was like that bear, and he dried his hair, and his anti-missile was wilted as soon as the battle started.

Of course, China has the strength to intercept missiles, didn't we carry out a medium-range interception of anti-missile missiles a while ago, and we succeeded, if we do not have air defense capabilities, then what will the Second Artillery Corps do, the United States will not be even more rampant, and Taiwan will be even more beautiful. This is all India's hype, and although this interception was a success, it is of little practical significance at all. India is blind, sooner or later, he will eat the bitter fruit.

China has terminal anti-missile capabilities, but most countries in the world have a little terminal anti-missile capabilities. In terms of mid-course anti-missiles, only China and the United States have mid-course anti-missile capabilities in the world. Therefore, China's comprehensive anti-missile capability ranks among the top three in the world.

According to the Global Times, India's anti-missile strength is not yet in tears.

India loves to compare with China, and you don't know it.

The current international strategic landscape is "multipolar."

"The multipolarization of the world is an objective development trend that conforms to the development needs of the times and is not subject to human will.

The development of a multipolar world will be a long and tortuous process of evolution full of complex struggles.

The contradiction between unipolarity and multipolarity, and the struggle between hegemony and anti-hegemony, will become the focus of international struggle for a considerable period of time in the 21 st century.

The first 20 years of the 21 st century will be a period of important strategic development opportunities and will play a vital role in the formation of multipolarization.

The international strategic pattern refers to the basic structure of the relations between the world's major countries or regions in a certain period of time. It is the general framework of the international strategic environment, which shows the distribution, combination and contrast of world forces.

In the international strategic landscape, countries and regions with strong military strength and political influence play a major and leading role in world affairs, and are often referred to as "poles" or "centers of power".

The current international strategic pattern: the dominant position in the international strategic pattern is the relationship between major powers; At present, the international strategic pattern is characterized by overall peace and local turmoil. There are new manifestations of hegemonism and power politics; The influence of economic factors on the international strategic pattern has increased; The importance of national defense construction has once again become prominent; international arms control and disarmament are at a standstill; The role of international organizations or regions with the United Nations at its core is becoming increasingly prominent; The elements of traditional and non-traditional security threats are intertwined, and the threat of terrorism is on the rise.

Resources.

A super-hegemony, China, Russia, Europe and other BRICS countries are a diversified pattern.